HITRUST CSF
Certifiable framework harmonizing 60+ security standards
Basel III
Global framework for bank capital, leverage, and liquidity standards
Quick Verdict
HITRUST CSF delivers certifiable security assurance for healthcare and regulated firms via maturity-scored controls, while Basel III mandates capital, leverage, and liquidity standards for banks. Organizations adopt HITRUST for third-party trust; Basel for systemic stability.
HITRUST CSF
HITRUST Common Security Framework
Key Features
- Harmonizes 60+ standards into certifiable library
- Risk-based tailoring via scoping factors
- Five-level maturity scoring model
- MyCSF platform for assessments and inheritance
- Centralized HITRUST QA and certification
Basel III
Basel III: International Regulatory Framework for Banks
Key Features
- Strengthened CET1 capital requirements and buffers
- Non-risk-based leverage ratio backstop
- Liquidity Coverage Ratio for 30-day stress
- Net Stable Funding Ratio for structural resilience
- Enhanced Pillar 3 disclosure templates
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
HITRUST CSF Details
What It Is
HITRUST Common Security Framework (CSF) is a certifiable, threat-adaptive control framework harmonizing over 60 standards like HIPAA, NIST, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and GDPR. It provides risk-tailored security and privacy controls across 19 domains, using a prescriptive maturity model.
Key Components
- Hierarchical structure: 14 categories, 49 objectives, ~156 specifications.
- 19 assessment domains (e.g., Access Control, Risk Management).
- Five-level maturity (Policy, Procedure, Implemented, Measured, Managed).
- Tiered certifications: e1 (44 controls), i1 (182), r2 (tailored, 2-year).
Why Organizations Use It
- Unified compliance: assess once, report many.
- Third-party assurance reduces audit fatigue.
- 99.4% breach-free rate in certified environments.
- Market differentiation in healthcare, finance.
Implementation Overview
Multi-phase: scoping via MyCSF, gap analysis, remediation, validated assessment by authorized assessors. Suited for regulated industries; requires evidence management, inheritance for cloud. High resource needs, 12-18 months typical.
Basel III Details
What It Is
Basel III is the international regulatory framework developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) post-global financial crisis. It sets prudential standards for banks, focusing on enhancing resilience through improved capital quality and quantity, leverage constraints, and liquidity requirements. Its risk-based approach combines minimum ratios with buffers and non-risk-based metrics.
Key Components
- **Three PillarsPillar 1 (capital, leverage, liquidity ratios like CET1 4.5%, leverage 3%, LCR/NSFR 100%); Pillar 2 (supervisory review/ICAAP); Pillar 3 (disclosures for comparability).
- Capital buffers (CCB 2.5%, CCyB, G-SIB surcharges).
- Output floor limiting internal model benefits.
- Compliance via national implementation, no central certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Banks adopt it for regulatory compliance, as jurisdictions mandate it. Benefits include reduced systemic risk, better funding costs, and strategic balance-sheet optimization. Enhances stakeholder trust amid crises.
Implementation Overview
Phased enterprise transformation: gap analysis, data/system upgrades, governance setup. Applies to internationally active banks globally; involves QIS, stress testing, ongoing reporting/audits. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | HITRUST CSF | Basel III |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Security/privacy controls across 19 domains | Bank capital, leverage, liquidity ratios |
| Industry | Healthcare, regulated sectors, industry-agnostic | Internationally active banks, financial institutions |
| Nature | Voluntary certifiable framework | Mandatory prudential regulatory standards |
| Testing | External assessor validated assessments | Supervisory review, ICAAP, stress testing |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties | Fines, capital add-ons, business restrictions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about HITRUST CSF and Basel III
HITRUST CSF FAQ
Basel III FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Measuring NIST CSF 2.0 Success: KPIs, Dashboards, and Continuous Improvement Using Tiers & Profiles
Transform NIST CSF 2.0 into quantifiable success: Define board-ready KPIs for Functions, build Profile dashboards, track Tier progression. Prove ROI amid cyber
NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity
Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier
The Human-AI Synergy: How Modern Compliance Tools Amplify Your Team's Strategic Impact
Unlock human-AI synergy with modern compliance tools. Automate monitoring, cut non-compliance risks 3x, and boost strategic decision-making. Elevate your team's
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
AS9100 vs ISO 13485
Compare AS9100 vs ISO 13485: Aerospace QMS adds config mgmt, safety, counterfeit prevention; med devices emphasize regulatory validation. Pick wisely—boost compliance now!
GMP vs WCAG
Discover GMP vs WCAG: Pharma's Good Manufacturing Practices (FDA/EU) vs W3C Web Accessibility Guidelines. Key differences, compliance tips for quality & digital inclusion. Dive in!
ISO 27001 vs ISO 28000
Compare ISO 27001 vs ISO 28000: Info security mgmt (27001) for data risks vs supply chain security (28000) for logistics threats. Boost compliance & resilience—explore now!