HITRUST CSF
Certifiable framework harmonizing 60+ security standards
EN 1090
EU standard for steel and aluminium structural execution
Quick Verdict
HITRUST CSF delivers certifiable cybersecurity assurance for healthcare and regulated industries, while EN 1090 mandates CE marking for structural steel/aluminium fabrication in EU construction. Organizations adopt HITRUST for trust and compliance mapping; EN 1090 for legal market access.
HITRUST CSF
HITRUST Common Security Framework
Key Features
- Harmonizes 60+ frameworks into certifiable controls
- Risk-based tailoring via structured factors
- Five-level maturity scoring model
- Centralized MyCSF platform and assessors
- Assess once, report many mappings
EN 1090
EN 1090 Execution of steel and aluminium structures
Key Features
- Factory Production Control (FPC) certification
- Execution Classes (EXC1-4) risk scaling
- CE marking for structural components
- Welding coordination per ISO 3834
- Material and process full traceability
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
HITRUST CSF Details
What It Is
HITRUST Common Security Framework (CSF) is a certifiable, threat-adaptive control framework consolidating requirements from 60+ standards like HIPAA, NIST, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and GDPR. It employs a risk-based approach with structured tailoring via organizational, system, and regulatory factors for scalable assurance.
Key Components
- 19 assessment domains and hierarchical controls (14 categories, ~49 objectives, ~156 specifications)
- Five-level maturity model: Policy, Procedure, Implemented, Measured, Managed
- Tiered assessments: e1 (44 controls), i1 (182 requirements), r2 (tailored)
- MyCSF platform for scoping, evidence, and certification
Why Organizations Use It
- Rationalizes multi-regulatory compliance (assess once, report many)
- Provides credible third-party assurance and certification
- Reduces TPRM costs, cyber insurance premiums, sales friction
- Enhances breach resilience (99.4% breach-free rate cited)
Implementation Overview
Multi-phase: scoping, readiness, remediation, validated assessment by authorized assessors, continuous monitoring. Suited for healthcare, finance; requires policies, evidence automation, inheritance for cloud. Typically 12-18 months for r2 certification.
EN 1090 Details
What It Is
EN 1090 is a harmonized European standard family for the execution of steel and aluminium structures and their conformity assessment under the Construction Products Regulation (CPR). It enables CE marking for load-bearing components, using a risk-based approach via Execution Classes (EXC1–EXC4).
Key Components
- **EN 1090-1Conformity assessment, Factory Production Control (FPC), Declaration of Performance (DoP).
- **EN 1090-2/-3Technical rules for steel/aluminium (materials, welding, tolerances, inspection).
- Core principles: traceability, welding per ISO 3834, NDT scaling by EXC.
- Certification model: Notified Body audits FPC with ongoing surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for EU market access with CE marking.
- Reduces liability, ensures quality, unlocks high-risk projects.
- Builds trust, cuts rework, aligns with Eurocodes.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, FPC build, personnel quals, NB certification.
- Targets fabricators in construction; 6-12 months typical.
- Applies EU/EEA-wide; requires certified rWC, traceability.
Key Differences
| Aspect | HITRUST CSF | EN 1090 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Cybersecurity and privacy controls across 19 domains | Execution of steel/aluminium structural components |
| Industry | Healthcare, finance, regulated sectors globally | Construction, fabrication in EU/EEA markets |
| Nature | Voluntary certifiable security framework | Mandatory harmonized standard for CE marking |
| Testing | Maturity-scored assessments by authorized assessors | FPC certification and surveillance by notified bodies |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, market access issues | Market exclusion, fines, legal liability under CPR |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about HITRUST CSF and EN 1090
HITRUST CSF FAQ
EN 1090 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates
Decode PDPA cross-border transfers for Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan. Statutory excerpts, approved mechanisms, SCC templates. Harmonize with GDPR, navigate exempt
NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity
Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier
The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance
Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 19600 vs Australian Privacy Act
Compare ISO 19600 vs Australian Privacy Act: CMS guidelines for governance, risk & PDCA vs APPs, NDB scheme & OAIC enforcement. Align for scalable compliance. Dive in now.
APPI vs FDA 21 CFR Part 11
Discover APPI vs FDA 21 CFR Part 11: Compare Japan's privacy law with FDA's electronic records rules. Master compliance strategies for global ops & avoid costly pitfalls.
NIS2 vs PMBOK
Compare NIS2 vs PMBOK: EU cybersecurity directive vs project mgmt standard. Align risk mgmt, governance & incident reporting for compliance. Tailor for essential entities now!