HITRUST CSF
Certifiable framework harmonizing 60+ security standards
ISO 31000
International guidelines for enterprise risk management
Quick Verdict
HITRUST CSF delivers certifiable security controls for healthcare and regulated sectors, while ISO 31000 provides non-certifiable risk management guidelines for any organization. Companies adopt HITRUST for third-party assurance; ISO 31000 for integrated enterprise risk governance.
HITRUST CSF
HITRUST Common Security Framework
Key Features
- Harmonizes 60+ frameworks into single certifiable assessment
- Risk-based tailoring via structured scoping factors
- Five-level maturity scoring for control effectiveness
- Centralized HITRUST QA with Authorized Assessors
- MyCSF platform supports inheritance and multi-reporting
ISO 31000
ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines
Key Features
- Eight core risk management principles
- Integrated framework with leadership commitment
- Iterative six-step risk process
- Customizable for any organization size
- Non-certifiable guidelines for flexibility
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
HITRUST CSF Details
What It Is
HITRUST Common Security Framework (CSF) is a certifiable, threat-adaptive control framework harmonizing over 60 authoritative sources like HIPAA, NIST 800-53, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and GDPR. It employs a risk-based, maturity-driven approach with hierarchical controls across 19 domains.
Key Components
- 14 categories, 49 objectives, ~156 specifications organized into 19 assessment domains.
- Five-level maturity model (policy, procedure, implemented, measured, managed).
- Tiered assessments: e1 (44 controls), i1 (182 requirements), r2 (tailored).
- MyCSF platform for scoping, inheritance, and certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Demonstrates unified compliance for "assess once, report many."
- Builds stakeholder trust via independent validation.
- Reduces third-party risk in healthcare/finance.
- Delivers 99.4% breach-free rate, ROI via efficiency/market access.
Implementation Overview
Phased via MyCSF: scoping, readiness, remediation, validated assessment by Authorized Assessors, certification (1-2 years validity). Suited for regulated industries; requires evidence management, policy maturity. (178 words)
ISO 31000 Details
What It Is
ISO 31000:2018, Risk management — Guidelines is an International Organization for Standardization framework providing non-certifiable guidelines for systematic risk management. Its primary purpose is to help organizations of any size or sector manage uncertainty affecting objectives, emphasizing value creation and protection through principles, framework, and process.
Key Components
- **Three pillars8 principles (e.g., integrated, customized, dynamic), framework (leadership, integration, design, implementation, evaluation, improvement), and 6-step process (communication, scope/context/criteria, assessment, treatment, monitoring/review, recording/reporting).
- Built on PDCA cycle for continual improvement.
- No fixed controls; flexible, tailored approach.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enhances decision-making, resilience, and governance.
- Drives strategic benefits like better resource allocation and opportunity capture.
- Builds stakeholder trust; aligns with regulations indirectly.
- Competitive edge in risk-informed strategies.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: leadership alignment, gap analysis, pilot, rollout, monitoring.
- Involves policy, training, tools like risk registers.
- Applicable universally; no certification, internal assurance via audits.
Key Differences
| Aspect | HITRUST CSF | ISO 31000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Security/privacy controls across 19 domains | Enterprise-wide risk management principles/process |
| Industry | Healthcare primary, all regulated sectors | All industries, any organization globally |
| Nature | Certifiable control framework | Non-certifiable guidelines |
| Testing | Validated assessments by external assessors | Internal monitoring, reviews, no certification |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties | No penalties, voluntary guidelines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about HITRUST CSF and ISO 31000
HITRUST CSF FAQ
ISO 31000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions
Unpack NIST CSF 2.0's enhanced Core Functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover. Get SME playbooks, governance shifts & strategies for cyber
Top 5 Reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Overlays Unlock AI Risk Management for Private Sector Enterprises in 2025
Top 5 reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 AI overlays unlock risk management for private enterprises. Tailorable controls combat model poisoning & data leakage. CISO i
Thailand PDPA Implementation Guide: Subordinate Regulations for 72-Hour Breach Reporting and Cross-Border Transfers (2022-2024 Rules)
Step-by-step Thailand PDPA guide: 72-hour breach notifications, cross-border transfers (2022-2024 rules). Risk checklists, GDPR templates avoid THB 5M fines. Mu
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
POPIA vs FedRAMP
Compare POPIA vs FedRAMP: South Africa's GDPR-like privacy law vs US federal cloud security. Unlock key differences, compliance strategies & global risk tips now.
HITRUST CSF vs EMAS
Discover HITRUST CSF vs EMAS: cybersecurity assurance powerhouse meets EU environmental gold standard. Unpack differences, benefits & choose your compliance path now.
ENERGY STAR vs CIS Controls
Compare ENERGY STAR vs CIS Controls: ENERGY STAR certifies energy-efficient products/buildings for savings & emissions cuts; CIS secures cyber defenses. Boost compliance now!