What is the primary objective of **HITRUST CSF**?

**The primary objective of HITRUST CSF is to provide a certifiable, threat-adaptive control library that harmonizes requirements from 60+ authoritative sources into a single assurance program enabling "assess once, report many."** This framework consolidates controls across 19 assessment domains and a hierarchical taxonomy of 14 categories, 49 objectives, and ~156 specifications, using risk-based tailoring via organizational, system, and regulatory factors. It employs a five-level maturity model (Policy 15pts, Procedure 20pts, Implemented 40pts, Measured 10pts, Managed 15pts) to ensure operational effectiveness, supported by MyCSF for scoping, evidence management, and validated certification.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **HITRUST CSF**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with HITRUST CSF, as it is a voluntary, industry-agnostic framework; however, professional requirements arise contractually from healthcare payers, providers, and vendors mandating certification for business associates handling ePHI/PHI.** Primary users include covered entities, business associates, life sciences firms, health IT vendors, financial services, and cloud providers processing sensitive data, where certification demonstrates standardized assurance to regulators, customers, and insurers via r2/i1/e1 pathways.

Does **HITRUST CSF** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, HITRUST CSF requires validated assessments by Authorized External Assessors for certification, followed by HITRUST centralized quality assurance review.** Self-assessments via MyCSF support readiness, but e1 (44 controls, 1-year), i1 (182 requirements, 1-year), and r2 (tailored, 2-year with interim) certifications demand evidence-based testing (documentation, interviews, technical scans) across maturity levels, producing standardized reports for third-party reliance.

How often should an assessment for **HITRUST CSF** be performed?

**HITRUST CSF validated assessments must be performed according to certification validity: e1/i1 annually, r2 every two years with a mandatory interim assessment at one year.** MyCSF enables continuous readiness monitoring, corrective action plans, and evidence refresh to sustain maturity scores above the 3+ threshold (72–79 range in legacy model), aligning with threat-adaptive CSF updates.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **HITRUST CSF**?

**Non-compliance with HITRUST CSF results in no direct legal penalties since it is voluntary, but contractually it leads to lost business, exclusion from healthcare ecosystems, and higher cyber insurance premiums.** Organizations face increased third-party risk scrutiny, duplicative audits, and failure to leverage inheritance/shared responsibility, potentially elevating breach exposure beyond the 99.4% breach-free rate of certified environments.

Can **HITRUST CSF** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, HITRUST CSF includes built-in mappings enabling requirement-level results to roll up into HIPAA, NIST SP 800-53, ISO 27001/27002, SOC 2, PCI DSS, GDPR, and 60+ other sources via MyCSF Insights Reports.** This supports "assess once, report many" without manual translation, with cross-references traceable from 19 domains to external scorecards.

What is the first step to begin implementing **HITRUST CSF**?

**The first step to implement HITRUST CSF is to access MyCSF, complete the scoping questionnaire defining organizational, system, and regulatory risk factors to generate a tailored control set.** This identifies inheritance opportunities (up to 65–85% from cloud providers), prioritizes high-risk requirements, and produces a readiness gap analysis for remediation planning.

What is the primary objective of **SQF**?

**The primary objective of SQF is to provide a rigorous, HACCP-based food safety management system that assures consistent production of safe food products across the supply chain.** Administered by the SQF Institute (SQFI), it combines universal **Module 2** (system elements like management commitment, food safety plans, verification, traceability, food defense, allergens, and training) with sector-specific Good Practices modules (e.g., **Module 11** for food manufacturing GMPs). This GFSI-benchmarked framework ensures preventive controls, operational PRPs, and continuous improvement via the triad: "say what you do," "do what you say," and "prove it."

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SQF**?

**SQF compliance is voluntary but professionally required for suppliers to major retailers, brand owners, and foodservice providers worldwide.** It applies to food sector categories (FSCs) including manufacturing (**Module 2 + 11**), storage/distribution, packaging, primary production, pet food, and supplements. Over 14,000 sites in 40+ countries pursue certification as a "license to trade," driven by buyer specifications rather than legal mandates.

Does **SQF** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, SQF mandates external audits by SQFI-licensed Certification Bodies (CBs) accredited to ISO/IEC 17065 for certification.** Initial certification, annual surveillance, and recertification audits (with unannounced audits every 3 years) use graded nonconformities (minor=1pt, major=5pts, critical=50pts) and scoring (E:96-100, G:86-95, C:70-85, F:<70). Auditor safeguards include rotation limits and witnessed audits.

How often should an assessment for **SQF** be performed?

**SQF requires annual external certification audits, with internal audits conducted at planned intervals covering all elements.** **Management reviews** occur at least annually (with monthly SQF Practitioner updates), plus verification activities like trend analysis. Pre-certification gap assessments are advised 60-90 days prior, after 30-60 days of records.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SQF**?

**Non-compliance with SQF results in audit failure, certification denial/suspension, and loss of market access to GFSI-demanding buyers.** Critical nonconformities (e.g., uncontrolled hazards) trigger immediate suspension; majors/minors require CAPA closure (often within 30 days). Commercial risks include contract loss, duplicative audits, recalls, and reputational damage.

An **SQF** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SQF maps closely to GFSI-benchmarked frameworks due to its HACCP foundation and management system elements.** **Module 2** aligns with shared requirements like preventive controls, supplier approval, and verification, enabling layering (e.g., SQF Quality Code atop existing programs). It harmonizes with global regulatory logic without direct substitution.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SQF**?

**The first step to implement SQF is to register the site in the SQFI assessment database and designate a full-time, on-site SQF Practitioner.** This HACCP-trained individual leads gap analysis against **Edition 9** (effective May 2021), Module selection, and system development per Part A guidance.

HITRUST CSF vs SQF

Standards Comparison

HITRUST CSF

Voluntary

2022

Certifiable framework harmonizing 60+ security standards

SQF

Voluntary

2023

GFSI-benchmarked certification for food safety management

Quick Verdict

HITRUST CSF delivers certifiable cybersecurity assurance for healthcare and regulated industries via maturity-scored controls, while SQF provides GFSI-benchmarked food safety certification through HACCP and GMPs. Organizations adopt them for trusted compliance, market access, and risk reduction.

Information Security

HITRUST CSF

HITRUST Common Security Framework

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Agile Scaling

SQF

Safe Quality Food (SQF) Code Edition 9

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Modular architecture: Module 2 plus sector GMPs
HACCP-based Food Safety Plan with validation
Mandatory full-time SQF Practitioner role
GFSI benchmarking for global recognition
Annual audits with unannounced requirements

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

HITRUST CSF Details

What It Is

HITRUST Common Security Framework (CSF) is a certifiable, threat-adaptive control framework harmonizing requirements from 60+ standards like HIPAA, NIST, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and GDPR. It employs a risk-based approach with structured tailoring via organizational, system, and regulatory factors.

Key Components

19 assessment domains across governance, technical controls, and resilience.
Hierarchical structure: 14 categories, 49 objectives, ~156 specifications.
Five-level maturity model (Policy, Procedure, Implemented, Measured, Managed).
Tiered certifications: e1 (44 controls), i1 (182 requirements), r2 (tailored, 2-year).

Why Organizations Use It

Rationalizes multi-regulatory compliance (assess once, report many).
Provides credible third-party assurance reducing audit fatigue.
Enhances risk management, TPRM, and breach resilience (99.4% breach-free certified).
Boosts market access, insurance benefits, sales differentiation in healthcare/finance.

Implementation Overview

Multi-phase: scoping in MyCSF, gap analysis, remediation, validated assessment by authorized assessors, certification. Suited for regulated industries (healthcare, finance); requires policies, evidence, inheritance for cloud. High effort but scalable via tiers. (178 words)

SQF Details

What It Is

Safe Quality Food (SQF) is a GFSI-benchmarked certification program administered by SQFI. It provides a HACCP-based management system for ensuring food safety and quality across the supply chain, from farm to fork, via modular codes tailored to sectors like manufacturing and storage.

Key Components

**Modular structureUniversal Module 2 (System Elements) plus sector-specific GMPs (e.g., Module 11 for processing).
Over 100 auditable clauses covering management commitment, HACCP plans, PRPs, verification, traceability, and food defense.
Built on Codex HACCP principles; requires SQF Practitioner designation.
Graded audits with certification via licensed bodies.

Why Organizations Use It

Meets retailer mandates for market access.
Reduces recalls, audit duplication, and risks via preventive controls.
Builds food safety culture, supplier trust, and GFSI alignment (e.g., FSMA).
Enhances reputation and operational efficiency.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, documentation, training, internal audits, certification audit.
Applies to all sizes in food sectors globally; 6-12 months typical.
Annual surveillance audits, unannounced options required.

Key Differences

Aspect	HITRUST CSF	SQF
Scope	Information security, privacy, 19 domains, maturity scoring	Food safety, quality, HACCP, GMPs, traceability, allergens
Industry	Healthcare, regulated sectors, industry-agnostic	Food manufacturing, storage, distribution, primary production
Nature	Certifiable framework, voluntary assurance program	GFSI-benchmarked certification, voluntary food safety standard
Testing	Maturity model, validated assessments by assessors, e1/i1/r2	Annual audits, internal audits, unannounced audits by CBs
Penalties	Loss of certification, no legal penalties	Loss of certification, market access denial, no legal penalties

Scope

HITRUST CSF

Information security, privacy, 19 domains, maturity scoring

SQF

Food safety, quality, HACCP, GMPs, traceability, allergens

Industry

HITRUST CSF

Healthcare, regulated sectors, industry-agnostic

SQF

Food manufacturing, storage, distribution, primary production

Nature

HITRUST CSF

Certifiable framework, voluntary assurance program

SQF

GFSI-benchmarked certification, voluntary food safety standard

Testing

HITRUST CSF

Maturity model, validated assessments by assessors, e1/i1/r2

SQF

Annual audits, internal audits, unannounced audits by CBs

Penalties

HITRUST CSF

Loss of certification, no legal penalties

SQF

Loss of certification, market access denial, no legal penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about HITRUST CSF and SQF

HITRUST CSF FAQ

SQF FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CMMC Cost Calculator: Realistic Budgets for Levels 1-3, C3PAO Fees, and ROI for Small DIB Suppliers

Calculate realistic CMMC costs for Levels 1-3: self-assessments, C3PAO fees, tooling, remediation & ROI. Interactive tool for small DIB suppliers. Get benchmark

HITRUST CSF MyCSF Platform Mastery: Infograph of Evidence Tagging Workflows and Top 5 Maturity Tier Acceleration Takeaways

Master MyCSF platform with infographics on evidence tagging for 1,400+ HITRUST controls across 19 domains. Cut documentation by 30%, boost Measured/Managed tier

SEC Cybersecurity Rules Implementation Guide: Mastering Form 8-K Item 1.05 Materiality Determination and 4-Business-Day Reporting Workflow

Master SEC Form 8-K Item 1.05 compliance with step-by-step materiality assessment, incident workflows & Inline XBRL tagging. Beat the 4-business-day clock. Esse

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

HITRUST CSF vs C-TPAT

Compare HITRUST CSF vs C-TPAT: certifiable cybersecurity framework vs CBP supply chain security program. Uncover differences, benefits & pick the best for compliance. (152)

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs SQF

CSL vs SQF: Compare China's Cybersecurity Law with food safety standards. Navigate compliance risks, data localization & HACCP strategies for global ops. Unlock advantages now!

PDPA vs FedRAMP

Compare PDPA vs FedRAMP: Asia's data acts meet US cloud security gold standard. Uncover scopes, controls, breaches & strategies for global compliance. Dive in now!

HITRUST CSF

SQF

Quick Verdict

HITRUST CSF

SQF

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

HITRUST CSF Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

SQF Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

HITRUST CSF FAQ

What is the primary objective of HITRUST CSF?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with HITRUST CSF?

Does HITRUST CSF require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for HITRUST CSF be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with HITRUST CSF?

Can HITRUST CSF be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing HITRUST CSF?

SQF FAQ

What is the primary objective of SQF?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SQF?

Does SQF require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SQF be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SQF?

An SQF be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SQF?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CMMC Cost Calculator: Realistic Budgets for Levels 1-3, C3PAO Fees, and ROI for Small DIB Suppliers

HITRUST CSF MyCSF Platform Mastery: Infograph of Evidence Tagging Workflows and Top 5 Maturity Tier Acceleration Takeaways

SEC Cybersecurity Rules Implementation Guide: Mastering Form 8-K Item 1.05 Materiality Determination and 4-Business-Day Reporting Workflow

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

HITRUST CSF vs C-TPAT

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs SQF

PDPA vs FedRAMP