IEC 62443
International standard for IACS cybersecurity frameworks
ISO 20000
International standard for service management systems
Quick Verdict
IEC 62443 provides risk-based cybersecurity for industrial control systems via zones, security levels, and certifications, while ISO 20000 establishes certifiable service management systems for IT lifecycle processes. Organizations adopt IEC 62443 for OT resilience; ISO 20000 for service reliability and trust.
IEC 62443
IEC 62443: Security for industrial automation/control systems
Key Features
- Risk-based zones/conduits with Target Security Levels
- Shared responsibility for owners, integrators, suppliers
- Security levels SL-T/SL-C/SL-A triad (0-4)
- Seven foundational requirements across system/component levels
- Modular ISASecure certifications (SDLA, CSA, SSA)
ISO 20000
ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018 Service management requirements
Key Features
- Annex SL structure for ISO integration
- Full service lifecycle management processes
- Risk-based planning and PDCA improvement
- Leadership accountability and governance focus
- Multi-supplier and ecosystem controls
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
IEC 62443 Details
What It Is
IEC 62443 is the international consensus-based standard series for cybersecurity of Industrial Automation and Control Systems (IACS). It provides a risk-based, shared-responsibility framework covering governance, risk assessment, secure architecture, system requirements, and product development lifecycle.
Key Components
- Four groupings: General (-1), Policies (-2), System (-3), Components (-4)
- Seven Foundational Requirements (FR1-7) like authentication, integrity, data flow
- Zones/conduits model and Security Levels (SL0-4) with SL-T/SL-C/SL-A
- ISASecure modular certifications (SDLA for processes, CSA/SSA for components/systems)
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates OT-specific risks (safety, availability, legacy constraints)
- Meets regulatory references (e.g., NIS-2, NERC CIP alignments)
- Enables procurement assurance, supply chain risk reduction
- Builds stakeholder trust via certifications, maturity levels (ML1-4)
- Supports modernization (IIoT, cloud) with competitive differentiation
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: governance (CSMS per -2-1), risk assessment (-3-2), segmentation, controls (-3-3/-4-2). Applies to critical infrastructure globally; requires OT expertise, audits. Multi-year for large orgs, pilots for quick wins. (178 words)
ISO 20000 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018 is the international certifiable standard for establishing, implementing, and improving a service management system (SMS). It focuses on managing the full service lifecycle—planning, design, transition, delivery, and improvement—for IT and other services, using a risk-based, PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) approach aligned with Annex SL for integration with standards like ISO 9001 and ISO/IEC 27001.
Key Components
- Clauses 4–10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, and improvement.
- Operational domains: service portfolio, relationships, supply/demand, design/transition, resolution/fulfilment, assurance.
- Core processes: incident/problem management, change/release, configuration/asset, availability/continuity, security.
- Certifiable via accredited bodies with Stage 1/2 audits, surveillance, recertification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Drives reliability, efficiency, customer trust; 50% certificate growth signals demand.
- Mitigates risks in outsourcing, multi-supplier ecosystems; enables market differentiation.
- Builds governance, reduces outages; BSI survey: 69% inspires trust, 59% improves services.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, design, deployment, audit (12-18 months typical).
- Suits all sizes/industries; requires leadership, training, tools like ITSM platforms.
Key Differences
| Aspect | IEC 62443 | ISO 20000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | IACS/OT cybersecurity lifecycle, zones/conduits, security levels | Service management systems, IT service lifecycle processes |
| Industry | Industrial sectors (energy, manufacturing, utilities), horizontal applicability | All service providers (IT, cloud, business services), any industry |
| Nature | Voluntary cybersecurity standards series, certifiable (ISASecure) | Voluntary service management standard, certifiable (ISO accredited) |
| Testing | ISASecure modular certification (CSA/SSA/SDLA), SL-A verification | Stage 1/2 audits, surveillance, management reviews, internal audits |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, supply chain exclusion, no legal penalties | Loss of certification, market/reputational disadvantage, no legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about IEC 62443 and ISO 20000
IEC 62443 FAQ
ISO 20000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Why the SEC Stepped In: The Investor-Driven Push for Cybersecurity Transparency
Discover why the SEC's 2023 cybersecurity rules treat cyber risks as material financial threats. Explore the 'stick and carrot' approach for standardized disclo
CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense
Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 Private Sector Tailoring Blueprint: First 5 Steps to Overlay-Driven Compliance with Infographic
Step-by-step blueprint for private sector NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 tailoring using overlays for AI & supply chain risks. Infographic + first 5 steps for ROI-drive
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
PDPA vs ISO 22301
Discover PDPA vs ISO 22301: Compare Asia's data privacy laws (Singapore/Thailand) with global BCM standards. Enhance compliance, resilience & risk mgmt. Dive in now!
ISO 37001 vs BREEAM
Discover ISO 37001 vs BREEAM: Anti-bribery management meets sustainable building certification. Compare compliance benefits, risk mitigation & ethics for smarter governance. Dive in!
Six Sigma vs MAS TRM
Explore Six Sigma vs MAS TRM: data-driven process excellence meets tech risk governance. Uncover differences, synergies, benefits & strategies to optimize operations and ensure compliance. Dive in!