IEC 62443
International standard for IACS cybersecurity lifecycle frameworks
SOX
US federal act mandating financial reporting controls and accountability
Quick Verdict
IEC 62443 provides risk-based cybersecurity for industrial OT globally, while SOX mandates financial control assessments for U.S. public firms. Companies adopt IEC 62443 for OT resilience and certification; SOX for legal compliance and investor trust.
IEC 62443
IEC 62443: Industrial automation and control systems security
Key Features
- Zones/conduits model for risk-based segmentation
- SL-T, SL-C, SL-A security levels triad
- Shared responsibility across owners, integrators, suppliers
- Seven foundational requirements (FR1-FR7)
- ISASecure modular certifications (SDLA, CSA, SSA)
SOX
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Key Features
- Mandates ICFR assessment and auditor attestation (Section 404)
- Requires CEO/CFO certifications with criminal penalties (302/906)
- Establishes PCAOB for public audit firm oversight
- Enforces strict auditor independence and rotation rules
- Provides whistleblower protections and document retention mandates
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
IEC 62443 Details
What It Is
IEC 62443 is the international series of standards for securing Industrial Automation and Control Systems (IACS). This consensus-based framework addresses OT cybersecurity across governance, risk assessment, system architecture, and product development. It uses a risk-based approach with zones/conduits segmentation and security levels (SL 0-4).
Key Components
- Four groupings: General (-1), Policies (-2), System (-3), Components (-4).
- Seven Foundational Requirements (FR1-7) like authentication, integrity, data flow.
- ~140 component requirements in 4-2; CSMS with maturity levels (ML1-4).
- ISASecure certifications: SDLA (4-1), CSA (4-2), SSA (3-3).
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates OT risks in critical infrastructure (energy, manufacturing).
- Enables shared responsibility, supply chain assurance.
- Supports regulatory compliance, insurance benefits, competitive edge.
- Builds stakeholder trust via certified products/systems.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: governance (2-1), risk assessment (3-2), controls (3-3/4-2), certification.
- Applies to asset owners, integrators, suppliers globally.
- Multi-year program with audits, continuous improvement.
SOX Details
What It Is
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) is a US federal statute enacted to enhance corporate accountability following scandals like Enron. It mandates accurate financial disclosures and robust internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) for public companies. SOX employs a risk-based, top-down approach aligned with frameworks like COSO, focusing on governance, auditing, and enforcement.
Key Components
- PCAOB oversight (Title I), auditor independence (Title II), executive certifications (Sections 302/906), and ICFR assessments (Section 404).
- No fixed control count; emphasizes key controls in entity-level, process, and ITGC domains.
- Built on COSO principles; compliance via annual management reports and auditor attestations for accelerated filers.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for US public issuers to avoid penalties, restatements, and delisting.
- Builds investor trust, reduces fraud risk, lowers capital costs.
- Enables IPO/M&A readiness, operational efficiency via automation.
Implementation Overview
- **Phasedscoping, documentation, testing, monitoring using GRC tools.
- Targets public companies; scaled for size (exemptions for smaller filers).
- Requires annual 10-K disclosures and PCAOB-standard audits. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | IEC 62443 | SOX |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | IACS/OT cybersecurity lifecycle | Financial reporting internal controls |
| Industry | Industrial sectors globally | U.S. public companies all sectors |
| Nature | Voluntary consensus standards | Mandatory U.S. federal law |
| Testing | Risk assessments, SL certification | Annual ICFR audits, attestation |
| Penalties | Loss of certification | Fines, imprisonment, SEC enforcement |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about IEC 62443 and SOX
IEC 62443 FAQ
SOX FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Top 10 NIST CSF 2.0 Myths Busted: Separating Hype from Reality for Smarter Adoption
Bust 10 NIST CSF 2.0 myths like 'only for critical infrastructure' or 'Govern replaces Identify'. Plain-English breakdowns, evidence, and fixes for flexible ris
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 Private Sector Tailoring Blueprint: First 5 Steps to Overlay-Driven Compliance with Infographic
Step-by-step blueprint for private sector NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 tailoring using overlays for AI & supply chain risks. Infographic + first 5 steps for ROI-drive
What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...
Explore a world without mandatory GDPR: How would organizations manage data? What data privacy regs would emerge? Uncover impacts on businesses and privacy laws
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
CE Marking vs POPIA
Discover CE Marking vs POPIA: EU product safety marking meets SA data privacy law. Compare requirements, pitfalls & strategies for global compliance success.
NIS2 vs ISO 20000
Compare NIS2 vs ISO 20000: Cybersecurity directive meets ITSM gold standard. Decode scopes, requirements, fines & compliance paths for resilient EU ops. Elevate security now!
CAA vs EN 1090
Discover CAA vs EN 1090: Compare US Clean Air Act emissions rules with EU steel/aluminum standards. Master compliance risks, strategies & global implementation for manufacturers.