What is the primary objective of **IFS Food**?

**IFS Food's primary objective is to audit product and process compliance ensuring manufacturers produce safe, legal products meeting customer specifications.** Version 8 (mandatory from 1 January 2024) uses a **Product and Process Approach (PPA)** with risk-based product sampling, traceability tests, and at least **50% audit time** in production areas to verify food safety, quality, legality, authenticity, and integrity via HACCP, PRPs, and operational controls like food fraud (4.20) and food defense (4.21).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **IFS Food**?

**IFS Food applies to food product manufacturers processing food or packing loose products where contamination risk exists.** It is **site-specific** (one legal entity, one address, one certificate), covering all site products/processes with limited exclusions (Annex 4). Primarily demanded by **European retailers** for private-label suppliers; fully outsourced/traded products require **IFS Broker**. Scope must detail products/processes precisely, including partly outsourced activities.

Does **IFS Food** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, IFS Food mandates annual external audits by ISO/IEC 17065-accredited certification bodies using approved auditors.** Audits include initial/recertification (full scope), follow-up (for Majors), and extension (for scope gaps). **Unannounced audits** required at least every third audit since 1 January 2021; certificate issued at **Higher Level** (≥95%) or **Foundation Level** (≥75%).

How often should an assessment for **IFS Food** be performed?

**IFS Food requires a full recertification audit every 12 months.** Internal audits (KO 5.1.1) must cover full scope annually; management reviews at least yearly (1.3). Unannounced audits occur in a **–16 weeks to +2 weeks** window around due date. Extension/follow-up audits triggered by gaps/seasonal operations.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **IFS Food**?

**Non-compliance with KO requirements (e.g., governance, CCP monitoring, traceability) or Majors blocks certification; score <75% or KO "D" (-50%) withdraws certificates.** Recertification failures trigger withdrawal within **2 working days**, database notification. Unannounced access denial leads to immediate withdrawal. Follow-up audits mandatory for Majors; unresolved issues prevent Higher/Star status.

An **IFS Food** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**No, IFS Food FAQs stand alone without mapping to other frameworks.** As a GFSI-benchmarked scheme, it shares foundations but differs in audit frequency (annual), ISO 17065 accreditation, scoring (Higher/Foundation Levels), and unannounced rules from peers.

What is the first step to begin implementing **IFS Food**?

**The first step is appointing an ISO/IEC 17065-accredited IFS-approved certification body and contracting for audit scope/duration.** Disclose products, processes, outsourced activities, exports, and certification history. Read normative **IFS Food v8** and **Doctrine**; conduct gap analysis against checklist, prioritizing **10 KO requirements**.

What is the primary objective of **AS9100**?

**AS9100 establishes a quality management system (QMS) for aviation, space, and defense organizations to ensure product safety, configuration integrity, and supply chain reliability.** Developed by the IAQG, the current AS9100D (2016) builds on ISO 9001:2015's 10-clause structure, adding over 100 aerospace requirements in Clause 8, including operational risk management (8.1.1), configuration management (8.1.2), product safety (8.1.3), and counterfeit parts prevention (8.1.4). It mandates process-based controls, risk-based thinking across enterprise (Clause 6.1) and operational levels, and lifecycle assurance to prevent catastrophic failures.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **AS9100**?

**AS9100 applies to organizations designing, developing, manufacturing, or servicing aviation, space, and defense products and services.** It targets manufacturers of parts, materials suppliers, design centers, and quality support organizations in ASD supply chains; AS9110 covers MRO, AS9120 distributors. Certification is contractually required by major OEMs and primes for supplier qualification, with visibility via IAQG's OASIS database; scope (Clause 4.3) must justify non-applicabilities without compromising conformity.

Does **AS9100** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, AS9100 requires accredited third-party certification via Stage 1 (readiness/documentation) and Stage 2 (implementation/effectiveness) audits.** Performed by IAQG-approved bodies using AS9101 guidance, certification lists organizations in OASIS. Nonconformities demand corrective actions within 60-90 days; maintenance involves annual surveillance audits and triennial recertification, emphasizing Clause 8 controls and objective evidence.

How often should an assessment for **AS9100** be performed?

**AS9100 requires internal audits at planned intervals per Clause 9.2, plus annual surveillance audits and recertification every three years post-certification.** Risk-based internal audits cover processes, Clause 8 additions, and effectiveness; management reviews (9.3) occur periodically. Gap analyses precede implementation; ongoing assessments verify continual improvement (Clause 10), supplier performance, and KPIs like delivery and escapes.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **AS9100**?

**Non-compliance with AS9100 risks contract termination, loss of OEM supplier status, and exclusion from OASIS listings.** Audits yield major nonconformities requiring root-cause analysis (considering human factors), corrective actions, and verification; unresolved issues suspend/revoke certification. Operationally, it leads to quality escapes, rework, safety incidents, regulatory scrutiny, and commercial penalties from primes enforcing certification as a prerequisite.

Can **AS9100** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, AS9100D aligns with ISO 9001:2015's Annex SL structure, enabling integrated management systems.** Its 10-clause PDCA framework (Clauses 4-10) supports mapping to compatible standards via shared risk-based thinking, leadership (Clause 5), and performance evaluation (Clause 9), while retaining aerospace-specific Clause 8 controls like product safety and configuration management.

What is the first step to begin implementing **AS9100**?

**The first step is conducting a comprehensive gap analysis against AS9100D clauses to identify current QMS maturity and prioritize remediation.** Assemble a cross-functional team to map processes (Clause 4.4), define scope (4.3), assess risks (6.1), and review Clause 8 additions; produce a report with roadmap, timelines (typically 6-18 months), and resource plan before documentation design and training.

IFS Food vs AS9100

Q: An **IFS Food** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**No, IFS Food FAQs stand alone without mapping to other frameworks.** As a GFSI-benchmarked scheme, it shares foundations but differs in audit frequency (annual), ISO 17065 accreditation, scoring (Higher/Foundation Levels), and unannounced rules from peers.

Q: What is the first step to begin implementing **IFS Food**?

**The first step is appointing an ISO/IEC 17065-accredited IFS-approved certification body and contracting for audit scope/duration.** Disclose products, processes, outsourced activities, exports, and certification history. Read normative **IFS Food v8** and **Doctrine**; conduct gap analysis against checklist, prioritizing **10 KO requirements**.

Q: What is the primary objective of **AS9100**?

**AS9100 establishes a quality management system (QMS) for aviation, space, and defense organizations to ensure product safety, configuration integrity, and supply chain reliability.** Developed by the IAQG, the current AS9100D (2016) builds on ISO 9001:2015's 10-clause structure, adding over 100 aerospace requirements in Clause 8, including operational risk management (8.1.1), configuration management (8.1.2), product safety (8.1.3), and counterfeit parts prevention (8.1.4). It mandates process-based controls, risk-based thinking across enterprise (Clause 6.1) and operational levels, and lifecycle assurance to prevent catastrophic failures.

Q: Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **AS9100**?

**AS9100 applies to organizations designing, developing, manufacturing, or servicing aviation, space, and defense products and services.** It targets manufacturers of parts, materials suppliers, design centers, and quality support organizations in ASD supply chains; AS9110 covers MRO, AS9120 distributors. Certification is contractually required by major OEMs and primes for supplier qualification, with visibility via IAQG's OASIS database; scope (Clause 4.3) must justify non-applicabilities without compromising conformity.

Q: Does **AS9100** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, AS9100 requires accredited third-party certification via Stage 1 (readiness/documentation) and Stage 2 (implementation/effectiveness) audits.** Performed by IAQG-approved bodies using AS9101 guidance, certification lists organizations in OASIS. Nonconformities demand corrective actions within 60-90 days; maintenance involves annual surveillance audits and triennial recertification, emphasizing Clause 8 controls and objective evidence.

Standards Comparison

IFS Food

Voluntary

2023

GFSI-benchmarked standard for food manufacturing safety and quality

AS9100

Mandatory

2016

International standard for aerospace quality management systems.

Quick Verdict

IFS Food ensures safe, authentic food via risk-based audits for manufacturers serving retailers, while AS9100 delivers aerospace QMS with configuration and counterfeit controls for aviation/space/defense suppliers. Companies adopt them for market access, compliance and supply chain trust.

Food Safety

IFS Food

IFS Food Version 8 Standard

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Product and Process Approach with traceability tests
Minimum 50% audit time in production areas
Annual audits with unannounced Star status option
Risk-based HACCP and KO critical requirements
Senior management governance and food safety culture

Quality Management

AS9100

AS9100D: Quality Management Systems for Aerospace

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Configuration management for product integrity
Product safety processes across lifecycle
Counterfeit parts prevention controls
Operational risk management in Clause 8
Enhanced supplier and supply chain controls

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

IFS Food Details

What It Is

IFS Food Version 8 is a GFSI-benchmarked certification standard for auditing product and process compliance in food manufacturing. It focuses on food safety, quality, legality, authenticity, and customer requirements using a risk-based Product and Process Approach (PPA) with on-site verification.

Key Components

Organized into governance, HACCP/PRPs, operational controls, and performance monitoring.
Over 200 checklist requirements with 10 Knock-Out (KO) criteria.
Built on HACCP principles, prerequisite programs, and emerging integrity topics like food fraud and defense.
Annual certification via accredited bodies with scoring (Higher/Foundation levels).

Why Organizations Use It

Meets European retailer demands for market access.
Reduces duplicate audits, enhances supply chain trust.
Manages risks in recalls, contamination, and fraud.
Builds competitive edge via Star status from unannounced audits.

Implementation Overview

Phased gap analysis, FSMS design, training, internal audits.
Targets food manufacturers globally, site-specific.
Requires ISO 17065-accredited audits with 50% on-site time.

AS9100 Details

What It Is

AS9100D (AS9100:2016) is the international quality management system (QMS) standard for aviation, space, and defense (ASD) organizations. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with over 100 aerospace-specific additions, using a risk-based, process-oriented approach to ensure product safety, configuration integrity, and supply chain reliability.

Key Components

10-clause Annex SL structure covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, and improvement.
Aerospace additions: configuration management (8.1.2), product safety (8.1.3), counterfeit parts prevention (8.1.4), operational risk management, human factors, and enhanced supplier controls.
Built on PDCA cycle; certification via accredited third-party audits (Stage 1/2, surveillance).

Why Organizations Use It

**Market accessRequired by OEMs for supplier qualification.
**Risk reductionPrevents safety incidents, defects, and supply chain failures.
**Efficiency gainsImproves delivery, reduces rework, enhances competitiveness.
Builds stakeholder trust through OASIS visibility and proven integrity.

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, certification (6-18 months). Applies to ASD designers/manufacturers globally; evidence-driven audits ensure effectiveness.

Key Differences

Aspect	IFS Food	AS9100
Scope	Food safety, quality, processes in manufacturing	Aerospace QMS with safety, configuration, counterfeit controls
Industry	Food manufacturing, global retailers especially Europe	Aviation, space, defense supply chains worldwide
Nature	GFSI-benchmarked voluntary certification standard	IAQG-managed voluntary certification standard
Testing	Annual product/process audits, 50% on-site, traceability tests	Stage 1/2 audits, annual surveillance, 3-year recertification
Penalties	Certification withdrawal, loss of retailer access	Certification suspension, loss of supplier approval

Scope

IFS Food

Food safety, quality, processes in manufacturing

AS9100

Aerospace QMS with safety, configuration, counterfeit controls

Industry

IFS Food

Food manufacturing, global retailers especially Europe

AS9100

Aviation, space, defense supply chains worldwide

Nature

IFS Food

GFSI-benchmarked voluntary certification standard

AS9100

IAQG-managed voluntary certification standard

Testing

IFS Food

Annual product/process audits, 50% on-site, traceability tests

AS9100

Stage 1/2 audits, annual surveillance, 3-year recertification

Penalties

IFS Food

Certification withdrawal, loss of retailer access

AS9100

Certification suspension, loss of supplier approval

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about IFS Food and AS9100

IFS Food FAQ

AS9100 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Beyond Reactive: Transforming Compliance into Real-Time Threat Prevention

Discover how modern compliance monitoring tools leverage continuous, real-time oversight and automated alerts to shift organizations from reactive problem-solving to proactive threat detection and prevention, safeguarding against emerging risks before they escalate.

Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence

Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance

ISO 27701 Standalone Certification in 2025: Debunking Myths and Navigating the New Reality

Debunk myths on ISO 27701 standalone certification post-2025. Clarify viability, accreditation bodies, ISO 27001 audit differences & procurement benefits. Guide

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 27001 vs TISAX

ISO 27001 vs TISAX: Global ISMS standard meets automotive supply chain security. Compare controls, risk approaches, implementation—choose the right path for compliance & resilience.

PDPA vs ISA 95

Compare PDPA vs ISA 95: Unpack Singapore's data privacy law against manufacturing's enterprise-control standard. Master compliant IT/OT integration, secure data flows & risk mitigation. Dive in now!

SAFe vs FSSC 22000

SAFe vs FSSC 22000: Agile scaling framework for IT meets GFSI food safety cert. Compare principles, configs, compliance & ROI—choose your enterprise edge now.

IFS Food

AS9100

Quick Verdict

IFS Food

Key Features

AS9100

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

IFS Food Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

AS9100 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

IFS Food FAQ

What is the primary objective of IFS Food?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with IFS Food?

Does IFS Food require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for IFS Food be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with IFS Food?

An IFS Food be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing IFS Food?

AS9100 FAQ

What is the primary objective of AS9100?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with AS9100?

Does AS9100 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for AS9100 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with AS9100?

Can AS9100 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing AS9100?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Beyond Reactive: Transforming Compliance into Real-Time Threat Prevention

Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence

ISO 27701 Standalone Certification in 2025: Debunking Myths and Navigating the New Reality

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 27001 vs TISAX

PDPA vs ISA 95

SAFe vs FSSC 22000