Standards Comparison

    ISA 95

    Voluntary
    2000

    International standard integrating enterprise and manufacturing control systems

    VS

    AS9120B

    Mandatory
    2016

    Aerospace QMS standard for parts distributors

    Quick Verdict

    ISA-95 provides integration models for manufacturing enterprises, while AS9120B mandates QMS certification for aerospace distributors. ISA-95 reduces IT/OT ambiguity voluntarily; AS9120B ensures traceability and counterfeit prevention, often required for supply chain access.

    Enterprise-Control Integration

    ISA 95

    ANSI/ISA-95 Enterprise-Control System Integration

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Purdue levels 0-4 defining enterprise-manufacturing boundaries
    • Canonical object models for equipment, materials, personnel
    • Activity models for production, quality, maintenance operations
    • Standardized transactions reducing Level 3-4 integration errors
    • Alias services mapping equivalent identifiers across systems
    Quality Management

    AS9120B

    AS9120B Quality Management Systems - Requirements

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Counterfeit and suspected unapproved parts prevention
    • Traceability and chain-of-custody for split lots
    • Risk-based external provider evaluation and controls
    • Configuration management via sales order records
    • Product safety and ethical behavior awareness

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISA 95 Details

    What It Is

    ANSI/ISA-95 (IEC 62264) is a technology-agnostic framework for integrating enterprise business systems like ERP with manufacturing operations systems like MES. Its primary scope is the Level 3-4 interface in the Purdue model, using hierarchical levels, activity models, and object semantics to standardize information exchanges and reduce integration risks.

    Key Components

    • Eight parts: models/terminology (Part 1), objects/attributes (Parts 2/4), activities (Part 3), transactions (Part 5), messaging/aliasing/profiles (Parts 6-8).
    • Purdue levels 0-4 organizing processes from physical production to business planning.
    • Core principles: shared vocabulary, consistent data models for equipment, materials, personnel.
    • No formal product certification; compliance via architectural alignment and training programs.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Drives IT/OT collaboration, cuts integration costs/errors, enables traceability/OEE. Supports regulatory audits, Industry 4.0, cybersecurity segmentation. Builds stakeholder trust through auditable, scalable architectures and competitive agility in manufacturing.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: assess gaps, define canonical models, pilot transactions, rollout with governance. Applies to manufacturing firms globally; requires cross-functional teams, data stewardship, security (IEC 62443). No mandatory audits; focus on semantic governance and testing. (178 words)

    AS9120B Details

    What It Is

    AS9120B is the IAQG quality management system standard for aerospace distributors, built on ISO 9001:2015's high-level structure. It establishes requirements for organizations procuring, storing, splitting, and reselling parts without altering characteristics, emphasizing risk-based thinking to mitigate supply chain risks like traceability loss and counterfeits.

    Key Components

    • Over 100 aerospace-specific additions to ISO 9001 across 10 clauses.
    • Core areas: context analysis, leadership, planning, support, operations (traceability, preservation, counterfeit prevention), performance evaluation, improvement.
    • Built on PDCA cycle; requires documented information, not a full manual.
    • Certification via accredited bodies, listed in IAQG OASIS.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Commercial necessity for OEM/Tier-1 supply chains.
    • Reduces risks of nonconformities, counterfeits, legal liabilities.
    • Enhances efficiency, customer trust, market access (2,442 global certifications).
    • Builds competitive edge through robust chain-of-custody.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, audits (6-12 months).
    • Applies to aviation/space/defense distributors globally.
    • Stage 1/2 certification audits; ongoing surveillance.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISA 95
    Enterprise-manufacturing system integration models
    AS9120B
    Aerospace distributor quality management

    Industry

    ISA 95
    Manufacturing, all sectors globally
    AS9120B
    Aerospace distribution specifically

    Nature

    ISA 95
    Voluntary reference architecture framework
    AS9120B
    Certification quality standard

    Testing

    ISA 95
    No formal certification, self-assessment
    AS9120B
    Third-party audits and certification

    Penalties

    ISA 95
    No penalties, integration risks only
    AS9120B
    Loss of certification, market exclusion

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISA 95 and AS9120B

    ISA 95 FAQ

    AS9120B FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages