Standards Comparison

    ISA 95

    Voluntary
    2000

    Standard for integrating enterprise and manufacturing control systems

    VS

    CIS Controls

    Voluntary
    2021

    Prioritized cybersecurity framework for cyber resilience

    Quick Verdict

    ISA 95 provides semantic models for enterprise-manufacturing integration in industrial settings, while CIS Controls offer prioritized cybersecurity safeguards for all organizations. Companies adopt ISA 95 to reduce integration errors; CIS Controls to mitigate cyber threats and achieve hygiene.

    Enterprise-Control Integration

    ISA 95

    ANSI/ISA-95 Enterprise-Control System Integration

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Defines Levels 0-4 hierarchy for enterprise-plant boundaries
    • Standardizes object models for equipment, materials, personnel
    • Activity models for manufacturing operations management (Part 3)
    • Transactions and messaging services between Levels 3-4
    • Alias services for mapping equivalent identifiers across systems
    Cybersecurity

    CIS Controls

    CIS Critical Security Controls v8.1

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • 18 prioritized controls with 153 actionable safeguards
    • Implementation Groups IG1-IG3 for scalable maturity
    • Mappings to NIST CSF, PCI DSS, HIPAA frameworks
    • Focus on asset/software inventories and vulnerability management
    • Free Benchmarks and tools like CIS-CAT for implementation

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISA 95 Details

    What It Is

    ANSI/ISA-95 (IEC 62264) is an international automation standard and reference framework for enterprise-control system integration. It defines models for integrating business systems like ERP with manufacturing operations (MES/MOM, SCADA) using a hierarchical Purdue levels (0-4) approach focused on semantic consistency and information exchange at the Level 3-4 boundary.

    Key Components

    • Eight parts: models/terminology (Part 1), objects/attributes (Parts 2/4), activities (Part 3), transactions (Part 5), messaging/aliasing/profiles (Parts 6-8).
    • Core models: equipment hierarchy, activity models, object information for materials/equipment/personnel/production.
    • No formal product certification; compliance via architectural alignment and training certificates.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Reduces integration risk, cost, errors; enables shared vocabulary for IT/OT collaboration; supports OEE, traceability, Industry 4.0; improves governance, security segmentation; voluntary but essential for manufacturing competitiveness.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased program: governance, gap analysis, canonical modeling, pilots, rollouts. Applies to manufacturing firms globally; involves cross-functional teams, data stewardship; no mandatory audits but self-assessed conformance.

    CIS Controls Details

    What It Is

    CIS Critical Security Controls v8.1 is a community-driven cybersecurity framework of prioritized, actionable best practices to reduce attack surfaces and enhance resilience. It applies across industries, using Implementation Groups (IG1-IG3) for risk-based, scalable adoption.

    Key Components

    • 18 Controls with 153 safeguards covering asset management to penetration testing.
    • IG1 (56 safeguards) for basic hygiene; IG2/IG3 for advanced maturity.
    • Built on real-world attack data; maps to NIST, PCI DSS, HIPAA.
    • No formal certification; self-assessed compliance via tools like CIS Navigator.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mitigates 85% of common attacks; accelerates regulatory compliance.
    • Lowers breach costs, improves efficiency, builds insurer/partner trust.
    • Provides competitive edge via proven hygiene and resilience.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased roadmap: governance, discovery, foundational controls, expansion.
    • Involves asset inventories, automation, training; suits all sizes/industries.
    • Uses free Benchmarks, CIS-CAT; 9-18 months for mid-sized IG2.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISA 95
    Enterprise-manufacturing integration models
    CIS Controls
    Cybersecurity best practices and safeguards

    Industry

    ISA 95
    Manufacturing, discrete/continuous/process
    CIS Controls
    All industries, technology-agnostic

    Nature

    ISA 95
    Voluntary reference architecture standard
    CIS Controls
    Voluntary prioritized cybersecurity framework

    Testing

    ISA 95
    Architectural alignment, no formal certification
    CIS Controls
    Safeguard assessments, maturity via IGs

    Penalties

    ISA 95
    No penalties, integration risks/costs
    CIS Controls
    No penalties, increased breach risk

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISA 95 and CIS Controls

    ISA 95 FAQ

    CIS Controls FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages