Standards Comparison

    ISA 95

    Voluntary
    2000

    Standard for integrating enterprise and manufacturing control systems

    VS

    ISO 22000

    Voluntary
    2018

    International standard for food safety management systems

    Quick Verdict

    ISA 95 provides integration models for manufacturing IT/OT systems, while ISO 22000 establishes certifiable FSMS with HACCP for food safety. Manufacturers adopt ISA 95 for semantic consistency; food organizations use ISO 22000 for hazard control and compliance assurance.

    Enterprise-Control Integration

    ISA 95

    ANSI/ISA-95 Enterprise-Control System Integration

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Defines Purdue Levels 0-4 for system boundaries
    • Standardizes object models for equipment and materials
    • Provides activity models for manufacturing operations
    • Specifies transactions between ERP and MES systems
    • Enables alias mapping for multi-system identifiers
    Food Safety

    ISO 22000

    ISO 22000:2018 Food safety management systems

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • High-Level Structure (HLS) for management system integration
    • Dual PDCA cycles for strategic and operational control
    • HACCP-based hazard analysis with CCPs and OPRPs
    • Prerequisite programs (PRPs) for hygienic baseline
    • Interactive communication across food chain

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISA 95 Details

    What It Is

    ANSI/ISA-95 (IEC 62264) is an international reference architecture framework for integrating enterprise systems like ERP with manufacturing operations (MES/MOM). Its primary scope is the Level 3-4 interface, using a Purdue hierarchical model (Levels 0-4) to define boundaries, activities, and information exchanges technology-agnostically.

    Key Components

    • Eight parts: models/terminology (Part 1), objects/attributes (Parts 2/4), activities (Part 3), transactions (Part 5), messaging/aliasing/profiles (Parts 6-8).
    • Core: equipment hierarchy, object models (materials, personnel), activity models.
    • Built on Purdue Reference Model; no formal certification, but training programs exist.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Reduces integration risk, cost, errors; enables semantic consistency, governance, OEE improvements. Strategic for IT/OT convergence, Industry 4.0; voluntary but essential for manufacturing competitiveness and regulatory traceability.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: assessment, canonical modeling, pilot, rollout. Applies to manufacturing firms; involves cross-functional teams, data governance, security segmentation. Focus on pilots (3-6 months) scaling to enterprise.

    ISO 22000 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 22000:2018, Food safety management systems – Requirements, is an international certification standard for Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS). It applies to any food chain organization, ensuring safe products through systematic hazard control, meeting regulatory and customer needs via risk-based thinking, HLS structure, and integrated HACCP principles.

    Key Components

    • 10 clauses (4-10): context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
    • Core elements: PRPs, hazard analysis, CCPs/OPRPs, traceability, emergency response, interactive communication.
    • Built on dual PDCA cycles and Codex HACCP.
    • Voluntary certification by accredited bodies.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Demonstrates compliance, reduces recalls and risks.
    • Enables market access, GFSI schemes like FSSC 22000.
    • Builds trust, integrates with ISO 9001/14001.
    • Enhances resilience, efficiency, reputation.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, PRPs, hazard plans, training, audits.
    • 6-18 months; scalable for SMEs to multinationals.
    • Food chain-wide; requires internal audits, management reviews.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISA 95
    Enterprise-manufacturing system integration models
    ISO 22000
    Food safety management system with HACCP

    Industry

    ISA 95
    Manufacturing, discrete/continuous/process industries
    ISO 22000
    Food chain: production, processing, retail, services

    Nature

    ISA 95
    Voluntary reference architecture/framework
    ISO 22000
    Voluntary certifiable management system standard

    Testing

    ISA 95
    No formal certification; self-assessed conformance
    ISO 22000
    External audits, certification, surveillance reviews

    Penalties

    ISA 95
    No penalties; integration risks/costs
    ISO 22000
    Loss of certification; market/regulatory exclusion

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISA 95 and ISO 22000

    ISA 95 FAQ

    ISO 22000 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages