ISA 95
Standard for integrating enterprise and manufacturing control systems
ISO 22000
International standard for food safety management systems
Quick Verdict
ISA 95 provides integration models for manufacturing IT/OT systems, while ISO 22000 establishes certifiable FSMS with HACCP for food safety. Manufacturers adopt ISA 95 for semantic consistency; food organizations use ISO 22000 for hazard control and compliance assurance.
ISA 95
ANSI/ISA-95 Enterprise-Control System Integration
Key Features
- Defines Purdue Levels 0-4 for system boundaries
- Standardizes object models for equipment and materials
- Provides activity models for manufacturing operations
- Specifies transactions between ERP and MES systems
- Enables alias mapping for multi-system identifiers
ISO 22000
ISO 22000:2018 Food safety management systems
Key Features
- High-Level Structure (HLS) for management system integration
- Dual PDCA cycles for strategic and operational control
- HACCP-based hazard analysis with CCPs and OPRPs
- Prerequisite programs (PRPs) for hygienic baseline
- Interactive communication across food chain
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISA 95 Details
What It Is
ANSI/ISA-95 (IEC 62264) is an international reference architecture framework for integrating enterprise systems like ERP with manufacturing operations (MES/MOM). Its primary scope is the Level 3-4 interface, using a Purdue hierarchical model (Levels 0-4) to define boundaries, activities, and information exchanges technology-agnostically.
Key Components
- Eight parts: models/terminology (Part 1), objects/attributes (Parts 2/4), activities (Part 3), transactions (Part 5), messaging/aliasing/profiles (Parts 6-8).
- Core: equipment hierarchy, object models (materials, personnel), activity models.
- Built on Purdue Reference Model; no formal certification, but training programs exist.
Why Organizations Use It
Reduces integration risk, cost, errors; enables semantic consistency, governance, OEE improvements. Strategic for IT/OT convergence, Industry 4.0; voluntary but essential for manufacturing competitiveness and regulatory traceability.
Implementation Overview
Phased: assessment, canonical modeling, pilot, rollout. Applies to manufacturing firms; involves cross-functional teams, data governance, security segmentation. Focus on pilots (3-6 months) scaling to enterprise.
ISO 22000 Details
What It Is
ISO 22000:2018, Food safety management systems – Requirements, is an international certification standard for Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS). It applies to any food chain organization, ensuring safe products through systematic hazard control, meeting regulatory and customer needs via risk-based thinking, HLS structure, and integrated HACCP principles.
Key Components
- 10 clauses (4-10): context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- Core elements: PRPs, hazard analysis, CCPs/OPRPs, traceability, emergency response, interactive communication.
- Built on dual PDCA cycles and Codex HACCP.
- Voluntary certification by accredited bodies.
Why Organizations Use It
- Demonstrates compliance, reduces recalls and risks.
- Enables market access, GFSI schemes like FSSC 22000.
- Builds trust, integrates with ISO 9001/14001.
- Enhances resilience, efficiency, reputation.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, PRPs, hazard plans, training, audits.
- 6-18 months; scalable for SMEs to multinationals.
- Food chain-wide; requires internal audits, management reviews.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISA 95 | ISO 22000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Enterprise-manufacturing system integration models | Food safety management system with HACCP |
| Industry | Manufacturing, discrete/continuous/process industries | Food chain: production, processing, retail, services |
| Nature | Voluntary reference architecture/framework | Voluntary certifiable management system standard |
| Testing | No formal certification; self-assessed conformance | External audits, certification, surveillance reviews |
| Penalties | No penalties; integration risks/costs | Loss of certification; market/regulatory exclusion |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISA 95 and ISO 22000
ISA 95 FAQ
ISO 22000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 10 Reasons CMMC Level 3 Certification Unlocks Competitive Edge for Primes Handling Critical DoD Programs
Discover top 10 reasons CMMC Level 3 certification unlocks competitive edge for DoD primes. Reduced APT risks, procurement prefs, NIST 800-172 compliance via v2

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows
Explore intuitive compliance software that automates workflows, simplifies onboarding, and reduces stress. Cut non-compliance costs 3x and boost efficiency for

The CIS Controls v8.1 Evidence Pack: What Auditors Ask For (and How to Produce Proof Fast)
Fail CIS Controls v8.1 audits due to missing evidence? Get the blueprint: exact artifacts auditors want, repository structure, and automation from security tool
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs CAA
CSL vs CAA: Compare China's Cybersecurity Law data localization & security mandates with US Clean Air Act NAAQS, permits & enforcement. Master compliance strategies now! (152 characters)
IFS Food vs ISO 41001
Compare IFS Food vs ISO 41001: GFSI food safety audits meet facility mgmt systems. Uncover scopes, audits, KO risks & benefits for compliance leaders. Choose wisely.
EMAS vs SQF
Compare EMAS vs SQF: EU's rigorous environmental scheme vs GFSI food safety gold standard. Boost compliance, performance & transparency. Choose wisely now!