What is the primary objective of **ISA 95**?

**ISA 95 establishes an international reference architecture for integrating enterprise business systems at **Level 4** (business planning and logistics, e.g., ERP) with manufacturing operations management at **Level 3** (MES/MOM, SCADA).** It organizes technology and processes into **Purdue levels 0–4**, defines activity models (**Part 3**), object models for equipment, materials, personnel, and production (**Parts 2, 4**), and standardizes information exchanges (**Parts 5–8**) to reduce integration **risk, cost, and errors** between these domains.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISA 95**?

**No organization is legally mandated to comply with ISA 95, as it is a voluntary international standard (ANSI/ISA-95, IEC 62264).** Manufacturing executives, IT/OT architects, system integrators, and MES/ERP vendors in discrete, batch, or continuous industries adopt it professionally to enable consistent enterprise-control integration, semantic alignment, and scalable operations across multi-site environments.

Does **ISA 95** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISA 95 does not require external audits or third-party product certification.** Compliance is demonstrated through internal architectural alignment with its **levels model**, **activity/object models**, and **information exchanges**; ISA offers an **Enterprise-Control System Integration Certificate Program** for training, but systems conformance relies on self-assessed implementation of **Parts 1–8**.

How often should an assessment for **ISA 95** be performed?

**ISA 95 assessments should be performed during initial implementation, major system changes, and annually as part of governance reviews.** Align with equipment hierarchy updates (**Part 1**), canonical model versioning (**Parts 2, 4**), and integration lifecycle practices (**Part 4**), ensuring ongoing consistency in **Level 3–4 interfaces**, alias mappings (**Part 7**), and security segmentation.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISA 95**?

**Non-compliance with ISA 95 incurs no formal penalties, as it lacks regulatory enforcement.** However, organizations face increased **integration costs, errors, data inconsistencies**, and operational risks at the **Level 3–4 boundary**, including poor OEE tracking, traceability gaps, prolonged MES/ERP projects, and challenges scaling Industry 4.0 initiatives without standardized semantics.

An **ISA 95** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISA 95's Purdue levels and models map directly to Purdue Enterprise Reference Architecture (PERA).** Its hierarchical structure (**Levels 0–4**), equipment models, and activity definitions provide a foundational blueprint for semantic consistency, enabling alignment with cybersecurity segmentation (e.g., zones/conduits) and modern data architectures while maintaining technology-agnostic interfaces.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISA 95**?

**Conduct a Levels 0–4 mapping workshop to classify systems and define the Level 3–4 interface charter.** Inventory existing ERP, MES, SCADA assets against **Part 1** models, identify equipment hierarchies, and prioritize **Parts 2–4** object/activity gaps to establish canonical semantics before transactions (**Part 5**) or messaging (**Part 6**).

What is the primary objective of **ISO 27018**?

**ISO 27018 provides a code of practice for protecting **PII** in public clouds where the provider acts as a PII processor.** It extends **ISO 27001** and **ISO 27002** with ~25–30 privacy-specific controls addressing cloud risks like multi-tenancy, subprocessors, consent, purpose limitation, data minimization, breach notification, and restrictions on secondary PII use (e.g., no marketing without consent). The 2025 edition aligns with **ISO 27002:2022**, emphasizing transparency, data subject rights support, and processor obligations across the PII lifecycle.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 27018**?

**ISO 27018 applies to public cloud service providers (CSPs) acting as PII processors, not controllers.** Targeted at hyperscalers, regional CSPs, and sector-specific platforms (e.g., healthcare, finance), it is a professional best practice for demonstrating processor duties like subprocessor disclosure and breach notification. No legal mandate exists; adoption is driven by customer procurement, regulatory alignment (e.g., GDPR Article 28), and market differentiation, with no thresholds for employee count or revenue.

Does **ISO 27018** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 27018 does not support standalone certification; controls are assessed within **ISO 27001** audits by accredited bodies under **ISO/IEC 17021** and **ISO/IEC 27006**.** Auditors review **ISO 27018** implementation via the Statement of Applicability (SoA) during Stage 1 (documentation) and Stage 2 (effectiveness) audits. Certificates reference **ISO 27018** alongside **ISO 27001**, valid for three years with annual surveillance.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 27018** be performed?

**ISO 27018 assessments occur annually via surveillance audits and every three years via full recertification within the **ISO 27001** cycle.** Internal risk assessments and gap analyses should be continual, integrated into the ISMS, with reviews triggered by changes in cloud services, subprocessors, or regulations to maintain control effectiveness.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 27018**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 27018 risks loss of market trust, procurement delays, and regulatory exposure, as it signals weak PII processor controls.** No direct fines apply (voluntary standard), but gaps can lead to contract breaches, cyber insurance issues, prolonged RFPs, and failure to meet laws like GDPR, potentially amplifying breach liabilities through inadequate transparency or notification.

An **ISO 27018** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 27018 maps directly to **ISO 27001** Annex A (93 controls), **ISO 27002:2022**, **ISO 27017** (cloud security), and **ISO 27701** (PIMS for controllers/processors).** Controls align with GDPR Article 28 processor obligations, supporting data minimization, rights handling, and subprocessor management across frameworks without replacing legal requirements.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 27018**?

**Conduct a gap analysis against current ISMS, **ISO 27001** controls, and **ISO 27018** privacy objectives.** Engage stakeholders to scope PII processing, review documentation/SoA, identify deficiencies in transparency, contracts, and technical safeguards, then develop a prioritized roadmap for integration.

ISA 95 vs ISO 27018

Standards Comparison

ISA 95

Voluntary

2000

Standard for enterprise-manufacturing control system integration

ISO 27018

Voluntary

2019

International code of practice for PII protection in public clouds.

Quick Verdict

ISA 95 provides integration models for manufacturing enterprises, while ISO 27018 extends ISO 27001 for cloud PII protection. Manufacturers adopt ISA 95 for ERP-MES interoperability; cloud providers use ISO 27018 to assure customers of privacy compliance and build trust.

Enterprise-Control Integration

ISA 95

ANSI/ISA-95 (IEC 62264) Enterprise-Control System Integration

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Defines Purdue Levels 0-4 hierarchy for system boundaries
Standardizes object models for equipment, materials, personnel
Specifies activity models for manufacturing operations management
Defines transactions between ERP and MES at Levels 3-4
Provides alias services for cross-system identifier mapping

Cloud Privacy

ISO 27018

ISO/IEC 27018:2025 PII protection in public clouds

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Privacy controls for PII in public cloud processors
Subprocessor transparency and location disclosures
Prohibits unauthorized PII use like advertising
Mandates customer breach notifications
Supports data subject rights in cloud environments

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

ISA 95 Details

What It Is

ANSI/ISA-95 (IEC 62264) is an international automation standard and reference architecture for integrating enterprise business systems with manufacturing operations. Its primary purpose is defining consistent information models, hierarchies, and interfaces between Level 4 (ERP/logistics) and Level 3 (MES/MOM) using the Purdue model. It employs hierarchical levels, activity/object models, and semantic standards.

Key Components

Eight parts: models/terminology (Part 1), objects/attributes (Parts 2/4), activities (Part 3), transactions (Part 5), messaging/aliasing/profiles (Parts 6-8).
Core elements: equipment hierarchy, material/personnel/production objects, activity models for production/quality/maintenance.
Built on Purdue levels 0-4; no formal product certification, but training certificates exist.

Why Organizations Use It

Reduces integration risks/costs/errors, enables semantic consistency, supports IT/OT collaboration, improves OEE/traceability. Voluntary but essential for manufacturing digital transformation, regulatory audits, cybersecurity segmentation.

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: assessment, canonical modeling, pilot, rollout with governance. Applies to manufacturing firms globally; involves data stewardship, alias mapping, security (IEC 62443). No mandatory audits.

ISO 27018 Details

What It Is

ISO/IEC 27018 is a code of practice extending ISO 27001 and ISO 27002 specifically for protecting personally identifiable information (PII) processed by public cloud service providers (CSPs) acting as PII processors. Published in editions including 2014, 2019, and latest 2025, its primary scope targets cloud-specific privacy risks like multi-tenancy and cross-border flows. It uses a risk-based approach, augmenting ISMS with privacy controls.

Key Components

~25–30 additional privacy-specific controls on consent, purpose limitation, data minimization, transparency, accountability, subprocessor management, and breach notification.
Aligned with ISO 27001 Annex A (Organizational, People, Physical, Technological themes).
Built on principles like security safeguards and data subject rights support.
Integrated into ISO 27001 audits; no standalone certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Enhances customer trust, accelerates procurement via Statement of Applicability.
Supports GDPR Article 28, HIPAA processor obligations.
Mitigates PII risks in cloud environments.
Provides competitive differentiation for CSPs.

Implementation Overview

Gap analysis, integrate into existing ISMS.
Update policies, contracts, technical controls (encryption, logging).
Suited for CSPs all sizes, globally.
Third-party audits during ISO 27001 certification cycles.

Key Differences

Aspect	ISA 95	ISO 27018
Scope	Enterprise-manufacturing system integration models	PII protection in public cloud services
Industry	Manufacturing, discrete/continuous/process industries	Cloud service providers, all PII-processing sectors
Nature	Voluntary reference architecture/framework	Code of practice extending ISO 27001 certification
Testing	No formal certification; self-assessed conformance	ISO 27001 audits with 27018 controls; annual surveillance
Penalties	No penalties; business/operational risks only	No direct penalties; certification loss/reputational damage

Scope

ISA 95

Enterprise-manufacturing system integration models

ISO 27018

PII protection in public cloud services

Industry

ISA 95

Manufacturing, discrete/continuous/process industries

ISO 27018

Cloud service providers, all PII-processing sectors

Nature

ISA 95

Voluntary reference architecture/framework

ISO 27018

Code of practice extending ISO 27001 certification

Testing

ISA 95

No formal certification; self-assessed conformance

ISO 27018

ISO 27001 audits with 27018 controls; annual surveillance

Penalties

ISA 95

No penalties; business/operational risks only

ISO 27018

No direct penalties; certification loss/reputational damage

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ISA 95 and ISO 27018

ISA 95 FAQ

ISO 27018 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence

Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance

PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates

Decode PDPA cross-border transfers for Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan. Statutory excerpts, approved mechanisms, SCC templates. Harmonize with GDPR, navigate exempt

NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights

Demystify NIST CSF 2.0 jargon with plain English tables for Govern, Supply Chain & Core Functions. Actionable steps for risk oversight & vendor management. Empo

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

CE Marking vs BREEAM

Unravel CE Marking vs BREEAM: EU product safety compliance meets world-leading building sustainability certification. Compare requirements, benefits & strategies for market access success. Dive in!

PDPA vs ISO 27018

Unlock PDPA vs ISO 27018: Compare Singapore/Thailand/Taiwan privacy acts with cloud PII standard. Key diffs, compliance tips. Align strategy now!

SOC 2 vs ISO 21001

Discover SOC 2 vs ISO 21001: Compare security audits & trust criteria with educational management systems. Boost SaaS/edtech compliance. Choose now!

ISA 95

ISO 27018

Quick Verdict

ISA 95

Key Features

ISO 27018

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

ISA 95 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 27018 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

ISA 95 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISA 95?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISA 95?

Does ISA 95 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISA 95 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISA 95?

An ISA 95 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISA 95?

ISO 27018 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 27018?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 27018?

Does ISO 27018 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 27018 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 27018?

An ISO 27018 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 27018?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence

PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates

NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

CE Marking vs BREEAM

PDPA vs ISO 27018

SOC 2 vs ISO 21001