Standards Comparison

    ISA 95

    Voluntary
    2000

    International standard for enterprise-manufacturing control integration

    VS

    SAMA CSF

    Mandatory
    2017

    Saudi regulatory framework for financial cybersecurity

    Quick Verdict

    ISA 95 provides integration models for manufacturing enterprises globally, while SAMA CSF mandates cybersecurity controls for Saudi financial institutions. Manufacturers adopt ISA 95 for semantic consistency; banks use SAMA CSF for regulatory compliance and resilience.

    Enterprise-Control Integration

    ISA 95

    ANSI/ISA-95 Enterprise-Control System Integration

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Defines Purdue Levels 0-4 for enterprise-plant boundaries
    • Standardizes activity models for manufacturing operations management
    • Provides object models for equipment, materials, personnel
    • Specifies transactions and messaging for ERP-MES integration
    • Enables alias services for multi-system identifier mapping
    Cybersecurity

    SAMA CSF

    SAMA Cyber Security Framework Version 1.0

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Six-level maturity model with Level 3 minimum
    • Four core domains including third-party security
    • Board-level governance and CISO requirements
    • Principle-based controls aligned with NIST/ISO
    • Self-assessment and continuous improvement mandates

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISA 95 Details

    What It Is

    ANSI/ISA-95 (IEC 62264), or Enterprise-Control System Integration, is a technology-agnostic framework standardizing interfaces between business (Level 4) and manufacturing operations (Level 3). Its primary scope covers hierarchical models, activities, objects, and information exchanges to reduce integration risks, costs, and errors.

    Key Components

    • Eight parts: models/terminology (Part 1), objects/attributes (Parts 2/4), activities (Part 3), transactions (Part 5), messaging/aliasing/profiles (Parts 6-8).
    • Purdue Levels 0-4 hierarchy; equipment, material, personnel object models.
    • Activity models for production, quality, maintenance.
    • No formal product certification; compliance via architectural alignment and training certificates.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Drives semantic consistency for ERP-MES integration, enabling OEE improvements, traceability, and IT/OT collaboration. Reduces custom mapping costs, supports regulatory audits, enhances cybersecurity segmentation, and scales multi-site operations for competitive agility.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: governance setup, gap analysis, canonical modeling, pilots (3-6 months), rollouts. Applies to manufacturing firms globally; requires cross-functional teams, master data governance, security (IEC 62443 alignment). No mandatory audits.

    SAMA CSF Details

    What It Is

    The SAMA Cyber Security Framework (SAMA CSF Version 1.0), issued by the Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority in May 2017, is a mandatory regulatory framework for financial institutions. It prescribes governance, controls, and a maturity model to detect, resist, respond to, and recover from cyber threats, using a principle-based, risk-oriented approach.

    Key Components

    • Four domains: Cyber Security Leadership & Governance, Risk Management & Compliance, Operations & Technology, Third-Party Cyber Security.
    • Subdomains with principles, objectives, control considerations.
    • Six-level maturity model (Level 0-5; minimum Level 3: structured).
    • Aligned with NIST, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS; self-assessment compliance model.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for SAMA-regulated entities (banks, insurers) to avoid penalties.
    • Improves resilience, efficiency, incident response.
    • Enables partnerships, market access, risk intelligence.
    • Builds trust, competitive differentiation.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: initiation/gap analysis, risk assessment, design/deployment, operate/audit.
    • Targets Saudi financial sector, all sizes; board sponsorship key.
    • Self-assessments, SAMA reviews; no external certification.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISA 95
    Enterprise-manufacturing integration models
    SAMA CSF
    Cybersecurity governance and controls

    Industry

    ISA 95
    Global manufacturing, discrete/continuous
    SAMA CSF
    Saudi financial sector only

    Nature

    ISA 95
    Voluntary reference architecture standard
    SAMA CSF
    Mandatory regulatory framework

    Testing

    ISA 95
    Self-assessments, no formal certification
    SAMA CSF
    Periodic self-assessments and SAMA audits

    Penalties

    ISA 95
    No legal penalties
    SAMA CSF
    Fines, license suspension, enforcement actions

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISA 95 and SAMA CSF

    ISA 95 FAQ

    SAMA CSF FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages