Standards Comparison

    ISA 95

    Voluntary
    2000

    Framework for integrating enterprise business and manufacturing systems

    VS

    WELL

    Voluntary
    2014

    Certification standard for occupant health and well-being in buildings

    Quick Verdict

    ISA-95 provides semantic models for manufacturing-ERP integration, while WELL certifies buildings for occupant health via performance testing. Manufacturers adopt ISA-95 to reduce integration errors; building owners pursue WELL for productivity, ESG metrics, and market differentiation.

    Enterprise-Control Integration

    ISA 95

    ANSI/ISA-95 Enterprise-Control System Integration

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Defines Purdue levels 0-4 for enterprise boundaries
    • Standardizes object models for equipment, materials, personnel
    • Provides activity models for manufacturing operations management
    • Specifies transactions between Level 3 MES and Level 4 ERP
    • Enables alias services mapping equivalent identifiers across systems
    Building Health & Wellness

    WELL

    WELL Building Standard v2

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • 10 core concepts covering air, water, light, and more
    • Mandatory preconditions plus optional point-based optimizations
    • On-site performance verification testing required
    • Tiered certifications from Bronze to Platinum
    • Continuous monitoring pathways for ongoing compliance

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISA 95 Details

    What It Is

    ANSI/ISA-95 (IEC 62264) is an international framework standardizing enterprise-control system integration. It defines models for information exchange between Level 4 business systems (ERP) and Level 3 manufacturing operations (MES/MOM), using a Purdue Reference Model hierarchy (Levels 0-4) with activity, object, and functional models to reduce integration risks.

    Key Components

    • Eight parts: models/terminology (Part 1), objects/attributes (Parts 2/4), activities (Part 3), transactions (Part 5), messaging/aliasing/profiles (Parts 6-8).
    • Core elements: equipment hierarchy, material/personnel/production objects, standardized transactions.
    • No formal product certification; compliance via architectural alignment and training certificates.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Drives semantic consistency, cuts integration costs/errors, enables IT/OT collaboration. Offers regulatory traceability, OEE improvements, scalable architectures for Industry 4.0. Builds stakeholder trust through auditable data exchanges.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: assessment, canonical modeling, pilot integration, rollout. Applies to manufacturing firms globally; requires governance, master data management, security segmentation. Involves workshops, middleware, testing; no mandatory audits.

    WELL Details

    What It Is

    The WELL Building Standard (WELL v2) is a performance-based certification framework administered by the International WELL Building Institute (IWBI). It focuses on designing, operating, and verifying buildings to advance human health and well-being through evidence-based strategies. Its people-first approach emphasizes indoor environmental quality, policies, and measurable outcomes across air, water, light, and more.

    Key Components

    • **10 core conceptsAir, Water, Nourishment, Light, Movement, Thermal Comfort, Sound, Materials, Mind, Community (plus Innovation).
    • 24 Preconditions (mandatory) and 102 Optimizations (point-based).
    • Built on public health research; requires on-site performance verification.
    • **Certification tiersBronze (40 points), Silver (50), Gold (60), Platinum (80), with concept minimums.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Enhances occupant health, productivity, and ESG reporting.
    • Differentiates assets via verified health metrics; boosts rents and retention.
    • Complements LEED for holistic sustainability.
    • Builds stakeholder trust through rigorous testing.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, scorecard, documentation, verification, operations.
    • Applies to new/existing buildings, all sizes/industries.
    • Third-party review and on-site testing required; recertify every 3 years.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISA 95
    Enterprise-manufacturing system integration models
    WELL
    Building occupant health and well-being performance

    Industry

    ISA 95
    Manufacturing, discrete/continuous/process industries
    WELL
    Real estate, offices, residential, healthcare globally

    Nature

    ISA 95
    Voluntary reference architecture standard
    WELL
    Voluntary performance-based certification

    Testing

    ISA 95
    No formal certification; self-assessed conformance
    WELL
    Mandatory on-site performance verification testing

    Penalties

    ISA 95
    None; loss of integration benefits
    WELL
    None; failure to achieve certification

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISA 95 and WELL

    ISA 95 FAQ

    WELL FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages