What is the primary objective of **ISO 13485**?

**ISO 13485:2016 specifies requirements for a quality management system (QMS) where an organization needs to demonstrate its ability to consistently provide medical devices and related services that meet customer and applicable regulatory requirements.** The standard applies to organizations involved in one or more stages of the medical device life cycle, including design, production, distribution, installation, servicing, and post-market activities, with a focus on risk-based controls, documented processes, traceability, validation, and integration of ISO 14971 risk management.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 13485**?

**ISO 13485 applies to medical device manufacturers, contract manufacturers, suppliers of critical components, distributors, importers, service providers, and organizations involved in any stage of the medical device life cycle.** It targets entities whose activities affect device safety, performance, or regulatory compliance, including those providing sterilization, calibration, or software as a medical device; compliance is often required for market access under regimes like EU MDR and FDA QMSR (effective February 2, 2026).

Does **ISO 13485** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 13485 does not mandate third-party certification, but certification by accredited bodies is typically pursued for regulatory recognition and market access.** Certification involves a Stage 1 documentation review and Stage 2 implementation audit, followed by annual surveillance audits and recertification every three years, with auditors verifying objective evidence of established, implemented, and maintained processes per Clauses 4–8.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 13485** be performed?

**Internal audits for ISO 13485 must be conducted at planned intervals aligned with process risks, typically annually or more frequently for high-risk areas, per Clause 8.2.4.** Management reviews occur at planned intervals (Clause 5.6), often annually, incorporating audit results, CAPA status, complaints, and regulatory changes; gap analyses are recommended annually or upon changes in products, processes, or regulations.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 13485**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 13485 can result in failed certification audits, regulatory enforcement actions, product holds, recalls, fines, market withdrawal, and loss of authorization.** Auditors flag major nonconformities in areas like CAPA backlogs, inadequate risk management files, or missing process validation (IQ/OQ/PQ), leading to certification denial, surveillance audit failures, or escalated findings under frameworks like EU MDR or FDA QMSR.

An **ISO 13485** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 13485 can be mapped to other international frameworks through its process-based structure and Annex B correspondence table.** It aligns with ISO 14971 for risk management, ISO 9001 for general QMS elements (though not interchangeable), and regulatory systems like EU MDR (Annexes ZA–ZC) and FDA QMSR (effective February 2, 2026), enabling integrated compliance via shared requirements for documentation, audits, and post-market surveillance.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 13485**?

**The first step to implement ISO 13485 is to conduct a structured, evidence-based gap analysis against Clauses 4–8, prioritizing risks by patient impact and regulatory requirements.** Use cross-functional teams to review existing processes, documentation, and records (e.g., quality manual, medical device files), then develop a roadmap with owners, timelines, and KPIs for remediation.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 19600**?

**ISO 19600 provides guidelines for establishing, developing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving an effective compliance management system (CMS).** Published in 2014 as a principles-based, scalable framework, it applies to all organization types and sizes, emphasizing proportionality to structure, nature, and complexity. The standard uses a Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle and high-level structure, focusing on translating **compliance obligations** (laws, voluntary codes, contracts) into processes, controls, and culture via governance principles like independence and board access.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 19600**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 19600, as it is a non-mandatory guideline standard.** It targets any public, private, or non-profit entity seeking structured CMS guidance, scalable to size and complexity. Professionals such as CCOs, boards, and compliance officers adopt it voluntarily for benchmarking, risk management, and demonstrating governance to regulators, courts, or stakeholders, without certification.

Does **ISO 19600** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, ISO 19600 does not require external audits or third-party certification.** As a Type B guidance standard (not requirements-based), it recommends internal processes like planned audits (Clause 9.2, per ISO 19011) and management reviews, but external certification is unavailable. Organizations use it for self-assessment and alignment, unlike its successor ISO 37301.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 19600** be performed?

**ISO 19600 recommends periodic assessments through monitoring, audits at planned intervals, and management reviews.** Compliance risk reassessment occurs when changes or issues arise (Clause 4.6), with ongoing monitoring of obligations, performance indicators, and culture (Clause 9.1). Management reviews consider inputs like audits, nonconformities, and changes, typically quarterly or semi-annually for dynamic environments.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 19600**?

**There are no direct consequences for non-compliance with ISO 19600, as it imposes no legal or certifiable requirements.** Indirectly, lacking an aligned CMS may heighten exposure to regulatory penalties, fines, or reputational damage from unmet obligations, with courts potentially considering CMS absence when assessing penalties for contraventions.

An **ISO 19600** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 19600 uses a high-level structure compatible with other ISO management system standards.** Its PDCA cycle and clauses (context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement) enable integration with systems like quality or risk management, sharing terminology for unified processes while preserving compliance independence.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 19600**?

**The first step is determining the CMS scope and understanding organizational context (Clauses 4.1–4.3).** Document boundaries, internal/external issues, and interested parties' needs as documented information, ensuring proportionality and alignment with governance principles like compliance function independence.

ISO 13485 vs ISO 19600

Standards Comparison

ISO 13485

Mandatory

2016

International standard for medical device quality management systems

ISO 19600

Voluntary

2014

International guidelines for compliance management systems

Quick Verdict

ISO 13485 provides certifiable QMS requirements for medical device makers ensuring regulatory compliance and safety, while ISO 19600 offers guidelines for general compliance systems across all organizations. Companies adopt them for market access, risk reduction, and operational excellence.

Quality Management

ISO 13485

ISO 13485:2016 Medical devices Quality management systems

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Risk-based QMS for medical device lifecycle
Regulatory compliance and patient safety focus
Process validation and software verification requirements
Post-market surveillance and CAPA integration
Supplier tiering and traceability controls

Compliance Management

ISO 19600

ISO 19600:2014 Compliance management systems — Guidelines

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Principles of good governance for compliance function
Risk-based identification of compliance obligations
PDCA cycle for continual CMS improvement
Proportional and scalable to organization size
Integration with other management systems

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

ISO 13485 Details

What It Is

ISO 13485:2016 is an international certification standard titled "Medical devices — Quality management systems — Requirements for regulatory purposes." It provides a risk-based framework for QMS in medical device organizations across the lifecycle, from design to post-market surveillance, emphasizing regulatory compliance and patient safety.

Key Components

Clauses 4-8 cover QMS, management responsibility, resources, product realization, and measurement/improvement.
Over 100 requirements including process validation, risk integration per ISO 14971, supplier controls, and CAPA.
Built on process approach with documented procedures, records, and audits.
Third-party certification via stage 1/2 audits and surveillance.

Why Organizations Use It

Ensures market access in EU MDR, FDA QMSR-aligned regimes.
Reduces recalls, audit failures, and supply risks.
Builds stakeholder trust and operational efficiency.
Drives competitive advantages like faster approvals.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, documentation pyramid, eQMS adoption, validation, audits.
Applies to manufacturers, suppliers globally; 9-18 months typical.
Requires cross-functional teams, training, and living risk files.

ISO 19600 Details

What It Is

ISO 19600:2014, titled Compliance management systems — Guidelines, is an international standard providing non-certifiable guidance for establishing, developing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving a compliance management system (CMS). It uses a risk-based, scalable approach based on PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) and high-level structure, applicable to all organization types, sizes, and complexities.

Key Components

10 clauses covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, and improvement.
Core principles: good governance (e.g., compliance function independence), proportionality, transparency, sustainability.
Focuses on obligations identification, risk assessment, controls, training, monitoring; no fixed controls count.
Aligns with ISO management systems; predecessor to certifiable ISO 37301.

Why Organizations Use It

Mitigates compliance risks, reduces penalties and disruptions.
Enhances governance, culture, and operational efficiency.
Builds regulator confidence, stakeholder trust, and competitive differentiation.
Supports integration with quality, risk, and environmental systems.

Implementation Overview

Phased: context analysis, gap assessment, design, rollout, monitoring.
Proportional to size/complexity; all industries/geographies.
No certification; voluntary internal audits and benchmarking. (178 words)

Key Differences

Aspect	ISO 13485	ISO 19600
Scope	Medical device QMS lifecycle	General compliance obligations management
Industry	Medical devices and suppliers	All organizations, any sector
Nature	Certifiable requirements standard	Non-certifiable guidelines (withdrawn)
Testing	IQ/OQ/PQ, internal audits, certification	Risk-based audits, management reviews
Penalties	Certification loss, regulatory actions	No direct penalties (guidance only)

Scope

ISO 13485

Medical device QMS lifecycle

ISO 19600

General compliance obligations management

Industry

ISO 13485

Medical devices and suppliers

ISO 19600

All organizations, any sector

Nature

ISO 13485

Certifiable requirements standard

ISO 19600

Non-certifiable guidelines (withdrawn)

Testing

ISO 13485

IQ/OQ/PQ, internal audits, certification

ISO 19600

Risk-based audits, management reviews

Penalties

ISO 13485

Certification loss, regulatory actions

ISO 19600

No direct penalties (guidance only)

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ISO 13485 and ISO 19600

ISO 13485 FAQ

ISO 19600 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: Auditor Questions, Red Flags, and Evidence Prep for First-Time Pass

Ace your SOC 2 audit with predicted auditor questions, model answers, red flags, and evidence checklists from CPA best practices & SignWell's journey. Reduce st

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIS2 in Your Organization

Master NIS2 implementation with our detailed guide. Learn requirements, risk assessment, supply chain security, and compliance steps for your organization. Star

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365

Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

PIPEDA vs IEC 62443

Compare PIPEDA vs IEC 62443: Canada's privacy law meets OT cybersecurity standards. Unlock compliance gaps, risks, and strategies for secure data handling. Read now!

ISO 27032 vs PIPEDA

Compare ISO 27032 cybersecurity guidelines vs PIPEDA privacy law: differences, synergies & implementation for resilient compliance. Align standards today!

AEO vs SQF

Compare AEO vs SQF: Customs facilitation powerhouse vs GFSI food safety gold standard. Discover compliance gaps, ROI benefits & strategies to boost secure supply chains now.

ISO 13485

ISO 19600

Quick Verdict

ISO 13485

Key Features

ISO 19600

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

ISO 13485 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 19600 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

ISO 13485 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 13485?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 13485?

Does ISO 13485 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 13485 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 13485?

An ISO 13485 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 13485?

ISO 19600 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 19600?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 19600?

Does ISO 19600 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 19600 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 19600?

An ISO 19600 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 19600?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: Auditor Questions, Red Flags, and Evidence Prep for First-Time Pass

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIS2 in Your Organization

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

PIPEDA vs IEC 62443

ISO 27032 vs PIPEDA

AEO vs SQF