ISO 14001
International standard for environmental management systems
ISO 31000
International standard for risk management guidelines
Quick Verdict
ISO 14001 certifies environmental management systems for compliance and performance improvement across industries, while ISO 31000 provides non-certifiable guidelines for managing all risks enterprise-wide. Companies adopt ISO 14001 for ESG credentials and audits; ISO 31000 for strategic resilience.
ISO 14001
ISO 14001:2015 Environmental management systems requirements
Key Features
- Annex SL alignment for integrated management systems
- Risk and opportunity-based planning replaces preventive action
- Lifecycle perspective across supply chain operations
- Top management leadership and commitment requirements
- PDCA cycle for continual environmental improvement
ISO 31000
ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines
Key Features
- Eight principles for effective risk management
- Framework emphasizing leadership commitment
- Iterative process for risk assessment and treatment
- Customizable for any organization or sector
- Focuses on creating and protecting value
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 14001 Details
What It Is
ISO 14001:2015 is the international certification standard specifying requirements for an Environmental Management System (EMS). It provides a process-based framework to identify, control, and improve environmental performance across any organization, regardless of size or sector. Built on Annex SL High-Level Structure (HLS) and PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) methodology, it emphasizes risk-based thinking over prescriptive performance targets.
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, and improvement.
- Focuses on environmental aspects, compliance obligations, lifecycle perspective, and documented information.
- No fixed controls; flexible for integration with standards like ISO 9001 or ISO 45001.
- Certification via accredited bodies with Stage 1/2 audits, surveillance, and recertification.
Why Organizations Use It
Enhances compliance, reduces risks like fines and incidents, drives efficiency (e.g., energy savings), unlocks tenders, boosts ESG reputation, and builds stakeholder trust through verifiable performance.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: gap analysis, policy/objectives, training/controls, audits, certification (6-18 months typical). Scalable for SMEs to globals; requires leadership commitment and continual improvement.
ISO 31000 Details
What It Is
ISO 31000:2018, Risk management — Guidelines is an international standard providing non-certifiable guidance for enterprise-wide risk management. Its primary purpose is to help organizations systematically manage uncertainty affecting objectives, applicable to any size, sector, or type. It uses a principles-based, iterative approach emphasizing leadership integration and value creation.
Key Components
- **Eight principlesIntegrated, structured, customized, inclusive, dynamic, best information, human/cultural factors, continual improvement.
- Framework (Clause 5): Leadership, integration, design, implementation, evaluation, improvement.
- Process (Clause 6): Communication, scope/context/criteria, assessment, treatment, monitoring/review, recording/reporting.
- No fixed controls; guidelines only, no certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enhances decision-making, resilience, and value protection.
- Builds stakeholder trust; aligns with regulations indirectly.
- Drives strategic benefits like better resource allocation.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: sponsorship, gap analysis, pilot, scale, monitor.
- Tailored to context; involves policy, training, tools.
- Universal applicability; internal audits for assurance. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 14001 | ISO 31000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Environmental aspects, impacts, compliance, lifecycle | All uncertainties affecting any objectives |
| Industry | All industries, sectors, sizes worldwide | All industries, sectors, sizes worldwide |
| Nature | Certifiable EMS standard, voluntary | Non-certifiable guidelines, voluntary |
| Testing | Certification audits, surveillance, internal audits | Internal reviews, monitoring, no certification |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties | No penalties, internal governance only |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 14001 and ISO 31000
ISO 14001 FAQ
ISO 31000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Top 5 Reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Overlays Unlock AI Risk Management for Private Sector Enterprises in 2025
Top 5 reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 AI overlays unlock risk management for private enterprises. Tailorable controls combat model poisoning & data leakage. CISO i
Top 5 Reasons Automation Tools Like Vanta Slash SOC 2 Type 2 Timelines from Months to Weeks
Automation tools like Vanta cut SOC 2 Type 2 prep from 6 months to 6 weeks, saving 70% costs. See SignWell examples, AWS/Okta/GitHub integrations. CISOs: Get fi
What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...
Explore a world without mandatory GDPR: How would organizations manage data? What data privacy regs would emerge? Uncover impacts on businesses and privacy laws
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 37001 vs WELL
Compare ISO 37001 vs WELL: Anti-bribery governance meets health-focused buildings. Discover synergies for ethical, resilient organizations. Elevate compliance & wellness now!
APPI vs CMMI
APPI vs CMMI: Compare Japan's data privacy law with process maturity framework. Master compliance strategies, risk mitigation, and business optimization now. (152)
SOC 2 vs GDPR UK
Compare SOC 2 vs GDPR UK: Key differences in controls, audits & compliance. Align SOC 2 Type 2 with UK GDPR principles for robust security, trust & enterprise growth. Dive in now!