ISO 14064 vs EN 1090
ISO 14064
International standards for GHG quantification, reporting, verification
EN 1090
EU standard for steel/aluminium structures execution and CE marking
Quick Verdict
ISO 14064 enables credible GHG accounting for global organizations seeking transparency and assurance, while EN 1090 mandates CE marking for EU structural steel/aluminium fabricators ensuring safety and market access through certified Factory Production Control.
ISO 14064
ISO 14064 GHG quantification, reporting, verification standards
Key Features
- Three-part modular framework for inventories, projects, assurance
- Five core principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy
- Defines Categories 1-6 with equity/control boundary approaches
- Risk-based validation/verification with materiality thresholds
- Supports GHG Protocol alignment and regulatory compliance
EN 1090
EN 1090 Execution of steel and aluminium structures
Key Features
- Risk-based Execution Classes (EXC1-EXC4)
- Factory Production Control (FPC) certification
- CE marking under CPR for structural components
- Welding quality management via ISO 3834
- Material traceability and NDT requirements
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 14064 Details
What It Is
ISO 14064 is an international standard family (Parts 1:2018, 2:2019, 3:2019) for GHG quantification, reporting, and verification. It provides a modular framework for organizations and projects, emphasizing principle-based approaches like boundary-setting and uncertainty management.
Key Components
- **Part 1Organizational inventories with Categories 1-6.
- **Part 2Project reductions/removals with baselines and additionality.
- **Part 3Validation/verification processes.
- Five principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy.
- No formal certification; third-party assurance optional but recommended.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives regulatory compliance (e.g., CSRD, SB-253), investor trust, carbon market access, and decarbonization insights. Mitigates greenwashing risks, enhances comparability, and supports Scope 3 value-chain management.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: governance, boundary-setting, data collection, reporting, verification. Applies to all sizes/industries; 6-12 months typical, focusing on data systems and audits for mid-sized firms.
EN 1090 Details
What It Is
EN 1090 is the harmonized European standard family (EN 1090-1, -2, -3) for execution and conformity assessment of structural steel and aluminium components/kits. It enables CE marking under the Construction Products Regulation (CPR), focusing on fabrication, assembly, and performance constancy. Risk-based via Execution Classes (EXC1-EXC4) scaling requirements to failure consequences.
Key Components
- **Factory Production Control (FPC)documented system for processes, traceability, inspections.
- Technical rules: welding (ISO 3834), materials, tolerances, corrosion protection, NDT.
- ITT/ITC, DoP issuance, Notified Body certification/surveillance.
- 4 EXCs linking consequence/service/production categories.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for EU/EEA market access with CE marking.
- Mitigates liability, reduces rework/defects.
- Builds stakeholder trust, enables high-risk projects.
- Drives operational maturity, competitive bidding advantage.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, FPC development, welding quals/training, NB audits. Targets fabricators in construction (EU/UK). 3-12 months; certified FPC essential.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 14064 | EN 1090 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | GHG emissions quantification, reporting, verification | Steel/aluminium structural fabrication, conformity |
| Industry | All sectors worldwide, organizations/projects | Construction, fabrication in EU/EEA markets |
| Nature | Voluntary international standard family | Mandatory harmonized standard for CE marking |
| Testing | Third-party validation/verification optional | Notified Body FPC certification, surveillance audits |
| Penalties | Loss of credibility, no legal penalties | Market exclusion, fines, legal liability |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 14064 and EN 1090
ISO 14064 FAQ
EN 1090 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Breaking Down NIST CSF 2.0 Structure: Core, Tiers, Profiles, and Real-World Application
Master NIST CSF 2.0 structure: Govern + 5 Core functions, Tiers (Partial-Adaptive), Profiles for gaps, and real-world apps. Build effective cyber risk strategie

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance
Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac

Thailand PDPA Enforcement Trends 2025: Analyzing 1,048 Complaints, Breach Volumes, and Hidden Lessons for Proactive Compliance
Decode PDPC Thailand's 1,048 complaints & 610 breaches. Uncover consent/security violations, project 2025 enforcement. Risk heatmap, self-assessment & playbook
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Explore More Comparisons
See how ISO 14064 and EN 1090 compare against other standards