GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/ISO 14064 vs EN 1090
    Standards Comparison

    ISO 14064 vs EN 1090

    ISO 14064

    Voluntary
    2018

    International standards for GHG quantification, reporting, verification

    VS

    EN 1090

    Mandatory
    2009

    EU standard for steel/aluminium structures execution and CE marking

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 14064 enables credible GHG accounting for global organizations seeking transparency and assurance, while EN 1090 mandates CE marking for EU structural steel/aluminium fabricators ensuring safety and market access through certified Factory Production Control.

    Greenhouse Gas Accounting

    ISO 14064

    ISO 14064 GHG quantification, reporting, verification standards

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Three-part modular framework for inventories, projects, assurance
    • Five core principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy
    • Defines Categories 1-6 with equity/control boundary approaches
    • Risk-based validation/verification with materiality thresholds
    • Supports GHG Protocol alignment and regulatory compliance
    Structural Metalwork

    EN 1090

    EN 1090 Execution of steel and aluminium structures

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Risk-based Execution Classes (EXC1-EXC4)
    • Factory Production Control (FPC) certification
    • CE marking under CPR for structural components
    • Welding quality management via ISO 3834
    • Material traceability and NDT requirements

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 14064 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 14064 is an international standard family (Parts 1:2018, 2:2019, 3:2019) for GHG quantification, reporting, and verification. It provides a modular framework for organizations and projects, emphasizing principle-based approaches like boundary-setting and uncertainty management.

    Key Components

    • **Part 1Organizational inventories with Categories 1-6.
    • **Part 2Project reductions/removals with baselines and additionality.
    • **Part 3Validation/verification processes.
    • Five principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy.
    • No formal certification; third-party assurance optional but recommended.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Drives regulatory compliance (e.g., CSRD, SB-253), investor trust, carbon market access, and decarbonization insights. Mitigates greenwashing risks, enhances comparability, and supports Scope 3 value-chain management.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: governance, boundary-setting, data collection, reporting, verification. Applies to all sizes/industries; 6-12 months typical, focusing on data systems and audits for mid-sized firms.

    EN 1090 Details

    What It Is

    EN 1090 is the harmonized European standard family (EN 1090-1, -2, -3) for execution and conformity assessment of structural steel and aluminium components/kits. It enables CE marking under the Construction Products Regulation (CPR), focusing on fabrication, assembly, and performance constancy. Risk-based via Execution Classes (EXC1-EXC4) scaling requirements to failure consequences.

    Key Components

    • **Factory Production Control (FPC)documented system for processes, traceability, inspections.
    • Technical rules: welding (ISO 3834), materials, tolerances, corrosion protection, NDT.
    • ITT/ITC, DoP issuance, Notified Body certification/surveillance.
    • 4 EXCs linking consequence/service/production categories.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for EU/EEA market access with CE marking.
    • Mitigates liability, reduces rework/defects.
    • Builds stakeholder trust, enables high-risk projects.
    • Drives operational maturity, competitive bidding advantage.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis, FPC development, welding quals/training, NB audits. Targets fabricators in construction (EU/UK). 3-12 months; certified FPC essential.

    Key Differences

    AspectISO 14064EN 1090
    ScopeGHG emissions quantification, reporting, verificationSteel/aluminium structural fabrication, conformity
    IndustryAll sectors worldwide, organizations/projectsConstruction, fabrication in EU/EEA markets
    NatureVoluntary international standard familyMandatory harmonized standard for CE marking
    TestingThird-party validation/verification optionalNotified Body FPC certification, surveillance audits
    PenaltiesLoss of credibility, no legal penaltiesMarket exclusion, fines, legal liability

    Scope

    ISO 14064
    GHG emissions quantification, reporting, verification
    EN 1090
    Steel/aluminium structural fabrication, conformity

    Industry

    ISO 14064
    All sectors worldwide, organizations/projects
    EN 1090
    Construction, fabrication in EU/EEA markets

    Nature

    ISO 14064
    Voluntary international standard family
    EN 1090
    Mandatory harmonized standard for CE marking

    Testing

    ISO 14064
    Third-party validation/verification optional
    EN 1090
    Notified Body FPC certification, surveillance audits

    Penalties

    ISO 14064
    Loss of credibility, no legal penalties
    EN 1090
    Market exclusion, fines, legal liability

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 14064 and EN 1090

    ISO 14064 FAQ

    EN 1090 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Breaking Down NIST CSF 2.0 Structure: Core, Tiers, Profiles, and Real-World Application

    Breaking Down NIST CSF 2.0 Structure: Core, Tiers, Profiles, and Real-World Application

    Master NIST CSF 2.0 structure: Govern + 5 Core functions, Tiers (Partial-Adaptive), Profiles for gaps, and real-world apps. Build effective cyber risk strategie

    The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance

    The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance

    Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac

    Thailand PDPA Enforcement Trends 2025: Analyzing 1,048 Complaints, Breach Volumes, and Hidden Lessons for Proactive Compliance

    Thailand PDPA Enforcement Trends 2025: Analyzing 1,048 Complaints, Breach Volumes, and Hidden Lessons for Proactive Compliance

    Decode PDPC Thailand's 1,048 complaints & 610 breaches. Uncover consent/security violations, project 2025 enforcement. Risk heatmap, self-assessment & playbook

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how ISO 14064 and EN 1090 compare against other standards

    Other ISO 14064 Comparisons

    • FSSC 22000 vs ISO 14064
    • ISO 14001 vs ISO 14064
    • SQF vs ISO 14064
    • CAA vs ISO 14064
    • RoHS vs ISO 14064

    Other EN 1090 Comparisons

    • EN 1090 vs NERC CIP
    • EN 1090 vs GRI
    • EPA vs EN 1090
    • SQF vs EN 1090
    • ISO 14001 vs EN 1090
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved