What is the primary objective of **ISO 14064**?

**ISO 14064 provides requirements and guidance for quantifying, reporting, and verifying greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and removals.** The standard family comprises three parts: **ISO 14064-1:2018** for organizational-level inventories, **ISO 14064-2:2019** for project-level reductions/removals, and **ISO 14064-3:2019** for validation/verification. It enforces five principles—**relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy**—to ensure credible, comparable GHG statements supporting regulatory reporting, investor disclosure, and carbon markets.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 14064**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with ISO 14064, as it is a voluntary international standard.** It is professionally adopted by companies, governments, NGOs, and project developers needing credible GHG inventories for stakeholder demands, emissions trading, green finance, or procurement. Mid-to-large entities with material footprints (e.g., energy, manufacturing) use it for audit-ready reporting, especially where regulators or investors expect verifiable data aligned with principles like those in the GHG Protocol.

Does **ISO 14064** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 14064 does not require external audit or third-party certification.** Parts 1 and 2 provide self-implementation guidance, with **ISO 14064-3** offering optional validation/verification processes at limited or reasonable assurance levels. Third-party assurance by ISO 14065-compliant bodies enhances credibility for markets, but organizations may use internal reviews; certification applies to management systems like ISO 14001, not ISO 14064 directly.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 14064** be performed?

**ISO 14064 assessments should be performed annually to maintain consistency and track performance against a selected base year.** Organizational inventories under Part 1 cover a defined reporting period (typically calendar year), with base-year recalculations for significant structural changes (e.g., acquisitions). Project monitoring under Part 2 follows defined plans, and verification under Part 3 aligns with reporting cycles or stakeholder needs, ensuring ongoing relevance and transparency.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 14064**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 14064 carries no direct penalties, as it is voluntary.** Indirect risks include rejected GHG claims in carbon markets, failed procurement qualifications, investor skepticism, or regulatory scrutiny where aligned methods are expected (e.g., disclosure regimes). Poor inventories risk material misstatements, greenwashing accusations, and lost access to finance; verified statements under Part 3 mitigate these by demonstrating principle adherence.

Can **ISO 14064** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 14064 maps closely to the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard, sharing identical principles of relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, and accuracy.** Part 1 aligns with organizational Scopes 1-3; Part 2 supports project baselines/additionality. It integrates with ISO 14001 EMS via PDCA cycles, enabling interoperability for disclosures without cross-referencing other standards.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 14064**?

**The first step is defining organizational and operational boundaries per ISO 14064-1.** Select consolidation approach (**equity share, operational, or financial control**), identify emission sources/sinks across Scopes 1-3, and document relevance criteria. This governance decision, followed by base-year selection and gap analysis, ensures inventories reflect economic reality and support subsequent data collection, quantification, and verification.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 17025**?

**ISO/IEC 17025:2017 specifies general requirements for the competence, impartiality, and consistent operation of testing and calibration laboratories.** It ensures technical validity of results through metrological traceability, measurement uncertainty evaluation, method validation/verification, and risk-based controls across clauses 4–8, enabling global acceptance via ILAC mutual recognition.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 17025**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with ISO/IEC 17025:2017, but it is professionally mandatory for testing, calibration, and sampling laboratories seeking accreditation.** Suppliers, regulators, and customers in regulated sectors (e.g., manufacturing, environmental, forensics) refuse non-accredited results, as accreditation attests to competence within a defined scope by ILAC-signatory bodies like ANAB or A2LA.

Does **ISO 17025** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO/IEC 17025:2017 requires accreditation by an external accreditation body, not certification.** Assessments by national bodies (e.g., UKAS, PJLA) include document review, on-site evaluation, witnessed testing, and proficiency testing verification, attesting to technical competence unlike ISO 9001 certification.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 17025** be performed?

**ISO/IEC 17025:2017-accredited laboratories undergo external surveillance assessments annually and full reassessments every 2 years by the accreditation body.** Internal audits occur at planned intervals (typically annually, risk-based), with management reviews at least yearly to evaluate Clause 8 effectiveness, proficiency testing participation, and continual improvement.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 17025**?

**Non-compliance with ISO/IEC 17025:2017 results in accreditation suspension, scope reduction, or withdrawal by the accreditation body.** This leads to market exclusion (e.g., rejected tenders, customer refusals), regulatory non-acceptance of results, reputational damage, and operational risks from invalid data in safety-critical decisions.

Can **ISO 17025** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO/IEC 17025:2017 management system requirements (Clause 8) map directly to ISO 9001 via Option B, allowing integration without duplication.** Technical requirements (Clauses 6–7) remain unique, but alignments exist with ISO 15189 for medical labs; ILAC ensures mutual recognition across frameworks.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 17025**?

**The first step for ISO/IEC 17025:2017 implementation is a clause-by-clause gap analysis against current practices.** Identify deficiencies in impartiality (Clause 4), resources (Clause 6), processes (Clause 7), and management systems (Clause 8), prioritizing high-risk areas like measurement uncertainty and metrological traceability to develop a prioritized remediation plan.

ISO 14064 vs ISO 17025

Standards Comparison

ISO 14064

Voluntary

2018

International standards for GHG quantification, reporting, verification

ISO 17025

Voluntary

2017

International standard for competence of testing and calibration laboratories

Quick Verdict

ISO 14064 provides GHG accounting and verification principles for organizations worldwide, while ISO 17025 ensures laboratory competence for testing/calibration. Companies adopt 14064 for credible emissions reporting and 17025 for market-accepted results.

Greenhouse Gas Accounting

ISO 14064

ISO 14064 Greenhouse gases quantification and reporting

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Modular three-part structure for inventories, projects, assurance
Five core principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy
Defines Scopes 1-3 boundaries and emission classification
Risk-based validation and verification processes
Aligns with GHG Protocol for global comparability

Laboratory Quality

ISO 17025

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General requirements for testing laboratories

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Ensures competence, impartiality, consistent lab operations
Mandates risk-based thinking and impartiality risks
Requires metrological traceability and uncertainty evaluation
Demands method validation and proficiency testing
Supports ILAC mutual recognition for global acceptance

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

ISO 14064 Details

What It Is

ISO 14064 is an international standard family (Parts 1-3:2018-2019) for greenhouse gas (GHG) quantification, reporting, and assurance. It provides a modular framework for organizations to develop credible GHG inventories (Part 1), project-level reductions (Part 2), and independent validation/verification (Part 3), using a principle-based approach emphasizing relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, and accuracy.

Key Components

**Three interdependent partsOrganizational inventories, project accounting, assurance processes.
**Core principlesFive GHG accounting principles aligned with GHG Protocol.
Scopes 1-3 classification, boundary-setting, uncertainty management.
Voluntary third-party verification model under Part 3, often paired with ISO 14065.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives regulatory compliance (e.g., CSRD, SB-253), investor confidence, carbon market access, and decarbonization strategy. Mitigates greenwashing risks, enhances stakeholder trust, reveals efficiency opportunities, and supports Scope 3 supply-chain management.

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: governance, boundary-setting, data collection, reporting, verification. Applies to all sizes/industries globally; 6-12 months typical, with software/tools and cross-functional teams. Audit-ready via ISO 14064-3.

ISO 17025 Details

What It Is

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 is the international accreditation standard titled General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. It ensures technically valid results through risk-based thinking, focusing on impartiality, competence, and consistent operations for testing, calibration, and sampling.

Key Components

Eight elements: general (impartiality/confidentiality), structural, resource (personnel, facilities, equipment, traceability), process (methods, uncertainty, reporting), management system (Option A/B).
Emphasizes metrological traceability, measurement uncertainty, proficiency testing.
Built on performance-based principles aligned with ISO 9001.
Achieved via accreditation from ILAC-signatory bodies.

Why Organizations Use It

Meets regulatory/supply chain demands for credible results.
Reduces risks of invalid data impacting safety/finance.
Enables global acceptance, market access, competitive edge.
Builds trust with customers, regulators, stakeholders.

Implementation Overview

Phased PDCA: gap analysis, documentation, validation, audits, training.
Suits labs across industries/sizes globally.
Involves witnessed assessments, ongoing surveillance. (178 words)

Key Differences

Aspect	ISO 14064	ISO 17025
Scope	GHG emissions quantification, reporting, verification	Laboratory testing/calibration competence
Industry	All sectors worldwide, any organization	Testing/calibration labs across industries
Nature	Voluntary international standard family	Voluntary accreditation standard
Testing	Third-party validation/verification optional	Accreditation assessments, proficiency testing
Penalties	Loss of credibility, no legal penalties	Loss of accreditation, market exclusion

Scope

ISO 14064

GHG emissions quantification, reporting, verification

ISO 17025

Laboratory testing/calibration competence

Industry

ISO 14064

All sectors worldwide, any organization

ISO 17025

Testing/calibration labs across industries

Nature

ISO 14064

Voluntary international standard family

ISO 17025

Voluntary accreditation standard

Testing

ISO 14064

Third-party validation/verification optional

ISO 17025

Accreditation assessments, proficiency testing

Penalties

ISO 14064

Loss of credibility, no legal penalties

ISO 17025

Loss of accreditation, market exclusion

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ISO 14064 and ISO 17025

ISO 14064 FAQ

ISO 17025 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Beyond Reactive: Transforming Compliance into Real-Time Threat Prevention

Discover how modern compliance monitoring tools leverage continuous, real-time oversight and automated alerts to shift organizations from reactive problem-solving to proactive threat detection and prevention, safeguarding against emerging risks before they escalate.

Top 10 NIST CSF 2.0 Myths Busted: Separating Hype from Reality for Smarter Adoption

Bust 10 NIST CSF 2.0 myths like 'only for critical infrastructure' or 'Govern replaces Identify'. Plain-English breakdowns, evidence, and fixes for flexible ris

CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 Ransomware-Resilience Sprint: A 30-60-90 Day Action Plan (With Evidence Checklist)

Tactical CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 playbook for ransomware resilience. 30-60-90 day sprint with tool-agnostic tasks, ownership & evidence checklists to prove progre

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

SOX vs IATF 16949

Compare SOX vs IATF 16949: SOX mandates financial controls & CEO certifications for publics; IATF drives automotive quality via core tools & risk thinking. Uncover key diffs, strategies & compliance tips now!

ITIL vs ISO 17025

ITIL vs ISO 17025: Compare ITIL 4's agile ITSM practices (87% adoption, SVS focus) & ISO 17025's lab competence rules. Align IT or validate tests—discover key diffs now!

ISO 27018 vs ISO 28000

ISO 27018 vs ISO 28000: Cloud PII privacy (extends 27001) meets supply chain security (PDCA risk mgmt). Key diffs, benefits & choose right for compliance now!

ISO 14064

ISO 17025

Quick Verdict

ISO 14064

Key Features

ISO 17025

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

ISO 14064 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 17025 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

ISO 14064 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 14064?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 14064?

Does ISO 14064 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 14064 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 14064?

Can ISO 14064 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 14064?

ISO 17025 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 17025?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 17025?

Does ISO 17025 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 17025 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 17025?

Can ISO 17025 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 17025?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Beyond Reactive: Transforming Compliance into Real-Time Threat Prevention

Top 10 NIST CSF 2.0 Myths Busted: Separating Hype from Reality for Smarter Adoption

CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 Ransomware-Resilience Sprint: A 30-60-90 Day Action Plan (With Evidence Checklist)

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

SOX vs IATF 16949

ITIL vs ISO 17025

ISO 27018 vs ISO 28000