ISO 14064 vs ISO 27017
ISO 14064
International standard for GHG quantification, reporting, verification
ISO 27017
International code of practice for cloud security controls
Quick Verdict
ISO 14064 provides GHG quantification, reporting, and verification for all organizations, while ISO 27017 extends ISO 27001 with cloud-specific security controls for providers and users. Companies adopt 14064 for climate compliance and 27017 for trusted cloud security.
ISO 14064
ISO 14064 GHG quantification, reporting, verification standards
Key Features
- 1. Modular three-part family for inventories, projects, verification
- 2. Five principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy
- 3. Defines organizational boundaries and Scopes 1-3 emissions
- 4. Risk-based validation and verification processes
- 5. Supports GHG Protocol alignment and assurance
ISO 27017
ISO/IEC 27017:2015
Key Features
- Clarifies shared responsibilities between CSPs and CSCs
- Introduces 7 cloud-specific CLD controls
- Provides VM hardening and multi-tenancy segregation
- Enables customer monitoring of cloud activities
- Extends 37 ISO 27002 controls for cloud
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 14064 Details
What It Is
ISO 14064 is an international standard family (ISO 14064-1:2018, -2:2019, -3:2019) providing specifications and guidance for GHG quantification, reporting, and assurance. It covers organizational inventories (Part 1), project-level reductions/removals (Part 2), and validation/verification (Part 3), using a principle-based approach emphasizing relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, and accuracy.
Key Components
- Three interdependent parts forming a lifecycle from measurement to assurance.
- Core principles mirroring GHG Protocol for boundary-setting, Scopes 1-3, baselines, and monitoring.
- Requirements for data quality, uncertainty assessment, and audit trails.
- No formal certification; relies on third-party verification statements under Part 3.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enables regulatory compliance (e.g., CSRD, SB-253), investor trust, and carbon market access.
- Drives operational improvements via hotspot identification and Scope 3 insights.
- Mitigates greenwashing risks through independent assurance.
- Builds stakeholder confidence for decarbonization claims and supply-chain demands.
Implementation Overview
- Phased approach: governance, boundary design, data systems, reporting, verification.
- Applies to all organization sizes/industries; integrates with ISO 14001 EMS.
- Typical timeline 6-12 months; involves cross-functional teams, software tools, and verifiers.
ISO 27017 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27017:2015 is a code of practice extending ISO/IEC 27002 with cloud-specific information security controls. It provides implementation guidance for cloud services (IaaS, PaaS, SaaS) within an ISO 27001 ISMS, using a risk-based approach to address multi-tenancy, shared responsibilities, and virtualization risks.
Key Components
- 37 adapted ISO 27002 controls plus 7 new CLD cloud controls (e.g., segregation, VM hardening, asset removal)
- Covers domains like access control, operations security, supplier relationships
- Built on ISO 27001 ISMS; no standalone certification
- Dual guidance for CSPs and CSCs
Why Organizations Use It
- Clarifies shared responsibilities reducing cloud risk gaps
- Supports regulatory alignment (GDPR, CCPA indirectly)
- Enhances procurement trust and competitive differentiation
- Improves incident prevention via monitoring and hardening
Implementation Overview
- Integrate into ISO 27001 via risk assessment and control mapping
- Key steps: shared responsibility matrices, config hardening, audit prep
- Applies to CSPs/CSCs globally, all sizes; joint audits 9-12 months
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 14064 | ISO 27017 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | GHG emissions quantification, reporting, verification | Cloud-specific information security controls |
| Industry | All sectors worldwide, any organization | Cloud providers and users, IT-heavy sectors |
| Nature | Voluntary standards family for GHG accounting | Guidance extending ISO 27001 for cloud security |
| Testing | Third-party validation/verification optional | Integrated into ISO 27001 audits, no standalone |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, loss of credibility | No legal penalties, certification withdrawal risk |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 14064 and ISO 27017
ISO 14064 FAQ
ISO 27017 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Real-World ISO 27701 Success: Synthesized Case Studies, Metrics, and Lessons for Privacy Resilience
Real-world ISO 27701 success from Tribeca, Kocho: DSAR efficiency gains, risk score reductions, certification ROI. Synthesized metrics prove privacy resilience
SOC 2 for Fintech Startups: First 5 Steps to Compliance with Confidentiality Criterion Infographic
First 5 steps to SOC 2 compliance with Confidentiality for fintech SaaS. Infographic maps controls to risks like encryption & TPRM. Integrates GLBA/PCI DSS over
Top 5 Reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Overlays Unlock AI Risk Management for Private Sector Enterprises in 2025
Top 5 reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 AI overlays unlock risk management for private enterprises. Tailorable controls combat model poisoning & data leakage. CISO i
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Explore More Comparisons
See how ISO 14064 and ISO 27017 compare against other standards