ISO 17025
International standard for testing/calibration lab competence
ISO 30301
International standard for records management systems
Quick Verdict
ISO 17025 accredits testing labs for competent, impartial results trusted globally, while ISO 30301 certifies records systems ensuring reliable evidence governance. Labs adopt 17025 for market access; organizations use 30301 for compliance, auditability, and business continuity.
ISO 17025
ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General requirements for competence
Key Features
- Ensures competence, impartiality, consistent operation of labs
- Mandates metrological traceability and uncertainty evaluation
- Requires risk-based impartiality and confidentiality controls
- Demands method validation, verification, proficiency testing
- Enables global accreditation and result acceptance
ISO 30301
ISO 30301:2019 Management systems for records
Key Features
- HLS-aligned management system for records governance
- Normative Annex A operational controls for lifecycle
- Flexible conformity pathways including certification
- Explicit records requirements and risk-based planning
- Top management accountability and continual improvement
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 17025 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 17025:2017 is the international standard specifying general requirements for the competence, impartiality, and consistent operation of testing and calibration laboratories. It applies a risk-based, performance-oriented approach tying management controls to technical validity of results, covering testing, calibration, and sampling.
Key Components
- Eight main elements: general (impartiality/confidentiality), structural, resource, process, and management system requirements.
- Focuses on personnel competence, facilities, equipment traceability, method validation, uncertainty evaluation, proficiency testing.
- Built on risk-based thinking; Option A/B for management systems (standalone or ISO 9001-aligned).
- Leads to accreditation by bodies like ILAC signatories, not certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Ensures results are trusted globally, enabling market access and regulatory acceptance.
- Mitigates risks from invalid data in safety-critical decisions.
- Provides competitive edge via credibility; often required by customers/regulators.
- Builds stakeholder trust through demonstrated technical competence.
Implementation Overview
- Phased PDCA: gap analysis, documentation, training, validation, audits.
- Suits labs of all sizes in regulated industries worldwide.
- Requires accreditation assessments with witnessed testing.
ISO 30301 Details
What It Is
ISO 30301:2019 is an international standard specifying requirements for a Management System for Records (MSR). It provides a certifiable framework to establish, implement, maintain, and improve records processes, ensuring authoritative evidence of business activities. Applicable to any organization, it uses a risk-based, PDCA management system approach aligned with the High-Level Structure (HLS).
Key Components
- **HLS clauses 4–10Context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
- **Clause 8 & Annex A (normative)Records lifecycle controls (creation, capture, access, retention, disposition).
- Core principles: authenticity, reliability, integrity, usability.
- Flexible conformity: self-declaration, external confirmation, or third-party certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enhances governance, compliance, and risk management for legal/regulatory needs.
- Improves efficiency, auditability, and stakeholder trust.
- Integrates with ISO 9001, 27001; supports business continuity and transparency.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, policy design, operational controls, audits.
- Suited for all sizes/industries; 12-18 months typical with training, resources.
- Certification optional via accredited bodies.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 17025 | ISO 30301 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Testing/calibration lab competence, impartiality, technical validity | Records management system for creation, control, lifecycle governance |
| Industry | Testing, calibration labs across all sectors globally | Any organization managing records, all sectors globally |
| Nature | Accreditation standard for technical competence | Certifiable management system for records |
| Testing | Proficiency testing, witnessed assessments, surveillance audits | Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits |
| Penalties | Loss of accreditation, rejected results | Loss of certification, compliance failures |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 17025 and ISO 30301
ISO 17025 FAQ
ISO 30301 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder for Security, Availability, and Beyond
Decode AICPA Trust Services Criteria from auditor jargon to plain English with side-by-side tables, analogies & TL;DRs. CISOs & founders: implement SOC 2 contro
CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)
Translate CIS Controls v8.1 to cloud-native: Kubernetes patterns for IAM, logging, vuln mgmt, hardening on AWS, Azure, GCP + IaC. Practical playbook for teams.
Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence
Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 37301 vs PIPEDA
Compare ISO 37301 vs PIPEDA: Certifiable CMS meets Canada's privacy law. Discover differences in risk-based compliance, leadership, consent & safeguards for seamless alignment.
OSHA vs CIS Controls
Discover OSHA vs CIS Controls: Compare workplace safety standards with cybersecurity safeguards. Unlock gaps, overlaps, compliance strategies & risk management tips now!
GMP vs NIST 800-53
Explore GMP vs NIST 800-53: Compare pharma quality standards with federal security controls. Uncover baselines, tailoring, risk mgmt diffs for optimal compliance. Dive in now!