ISO 17025
International standard for competence of testing and calibration laboratories
MAS TRM
Singapore guidelines for financial technology risk management.
Quick Verdict
ISO 17025 accredits testing labs' technical competence globally, ensuring valid results via validation and proficiency testing. MAS TRM guides Singapore FIs on technology risks with cyber resilience mandates. Labs seek market access; FIs avoid fines and ensure stability.
ISO 17025
ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General requirements for competence of testing and calibration laboratories
Key Features
- Dedicated impartiality and confidentiality requirements
- Risk-based thinking integrated throughout clauses
- Metrological traceability and uncertainty evaluation mandatory
- Technical competence lifecycle for personnel
- Accreditation attesting scope-specific competence
MAS TRM
MAS Technology Risk Management Guidelines (2021)
Key Features
- Board and senior management accountability
- Proportional risk-based implementation
- Third-party risk as first-class domain
- End-to-end control lifecycle coverage
- Annual penetration testing for internet systems
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 17025 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 17025:2017 is the international standard specifying general requirements for the competence, impartiality, and consistent operation of testing and calibration laboratories. It applies a risk-based, performance-oriented approach tying management controls to technical validity of results, covering testing, calibration, and sampling activities.
Key Components
- Eight main clauses: general (impartiality/confidentiality), structural, resource, process, and management system requirements.
- Focus on personnel competence, facilities/equipment, metrological traceability, method validation, uncertainty evaluation, and proficiency testing.
- Built on risk-based thinking; Option A/B for management systems (standalone or ISO 9001-aligned).
- Leads to accreditation by bodies like ILAC signatories, attesting technical competence in defined scopes.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enables market access, regulatory acceptance, and international result recognition.
- Mitigates risks from invalid results in safety-critical domains.
- Builds stakeholder trust via demonstrated impartiality and traceability.
- Provides competitive edge through credible, defensible outputs.
Implementation Overview
- Phased PDCA approach: gap analysis, documentation, technical validation, audits.
- Suited for labs across industries; requires metrology expertise, PT participation.
- Involves accreditation assessments with witnessed activities.
MAS TRM Details
What It Is
MAS Technology Risk Management (TRM) Guidelines (January 2021) are supervisory guidelines issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore for financial institutions. They provide principles-based guidance on managing technology and cyber risks, emphasizing governance, controls, and resilience to protect confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of systems and data. The risk-based approach requires proportional implementation based on institution size, complexity, and exposure.
Key Components
- 15 main sections covering governance, risk frameworks, secure development, IT operations, resilience, access controls, cryptography, cyber defense, testing, and audit.
- Synthesized 12 core principles like board accountability, asset classification, third-party oversight, and defense-in-depth.
- No fixed controls; focuses on outcomes with independent assurance via audit.
Why Organizations Use It
Financial institutions adopt TRM for regulatory supervision, avoiding fines and enforcement. It enhances resilience, reduces cyber incidents, builds customer trust, and supports digital transformation securely.
Implementation Overview
Involves asset inventories, risk assessments, control design across lifecycle, testing regimes, and third-party due diligence. Applies to all MAS-supervised FIs; phased rollout (6-24 months) with board oversight and continuous monitoring. No formal certification, but MAS reviews observance.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 17025 | MAS TRM |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Laboratory competence, testing/calibration validity | Financial institutions' technology/cyber risks |
| Industry | Testing/calibration labs globally | Singapore financial institutions |
| Nature | Voluntary accreditation standard | Supervisory guidelines with enforcement |
| Testing | Proficiency testing, method validation, audits | Penetration testing, vulnerability scans, DR tests |
| Penalties | Loss of accreditation | Fines, license revocation, prohibitions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 17025 and MAS TRM
ISO 17025 FAQ
MAS TRM FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 5 Reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Overlays Unlock AI Risk Management for Private Sector Enterprises in 2025
Top 5 reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 AI overlays unlock risk management for private enterprises. Tailorable controls combat model poisoning & data leakage. CISO i

Thailand PDPA Enforcement Trends 2025: Analyzing 1,048 Complaints, Breach Volumes, and Hidden Lessons for Proactive Compliance
Decode PDPC Thailand's 1,048 complaints & 610 breaches. Uncover consent/security violations, project 2025 enforcement. Risk heatmap, self-assessment & playbook

Why the SEC Stepped In: The Investor-Driven Push for Cybersecurity Transparency
Discover why the SEC's 2023 cybersecurity rules treat cyber risks as material financial threats. Explore the 'stick and carrot' approach for standardized disclo
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 14064 vs ISO 27018
Explore ISO 14064 vs ISO 27018: GHG inventories & verification (14064) vs cloud PII privacy controls (27018). Key diffs, principles, benefits. Optimize compliance now!
WEEE vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023
Explore WEEE Directive vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023—EU e-waste rules meet AI governance. Key diffs, targets, EPR strategies & best practices for compliance success!
Australian Privacy Act vs ISO 21001
Compare Australian Privacy Act vs ISO 21001: Key differences in privacy rules, data security & ed mgmt systems. Align for compliance, learner trust & risk reduction now!