Standards Comparison

    ISO 17025

    Voluntary
    2017

    International standard for competence of testing and calibration laboratories

    VS

    MAS TRM

    Mandatory
    2021

    Singapore guidelines for financial technology risk management.

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 17025 accredits testing labs' technical competence globally, ensuring valid results via validation and proficiency testing. MAS TRM guides Singapore FIs on technology risks with cyber resilience mandates. Labs seek market access; FIs avoid fines and ensure stability.

    Laboratory Quality

    ISO 17025

    ISO/IEC 17025:2017 General requirements for competence of testing and calibration laboratories

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Dedicated impartiality and confidentiality requirements
    • Risk-based thinking integrated throughout clauses
    • Metrological traceability and uncertainty evaluation mandatory
    • Technical competence lifecycle for personnel
    • Accreditation attesting scope-specific competence
    Technology Risk Management

    MAS TRM

    MAS Technology Risk Management Guidelines (2021)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Board and senior management accountability
    • Proportional risk-based implementation
    • Third-party risk as first-class domain
    • End-to-end control lifecycle coverage
    • Annual penetration testing for internet systems

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 17025 Details

    What It Is

    ISO/IEC 17025:2017 is the international standard specifying general requirements for the competence, impartiality, and consistent operation of testing and calibration laboratories. It applies a risk-based, performance-oriented approach tying management controls to technical validity of results, covering testing, calibration, and sampling activities.

    Key Components

    • Eight main clauses: general (impartiality/confidentiality), structural, resource, process, and management system requirements.
    • Focus on personnel competence, facilities/equipment, metrological traceability, method validation, uncertainty evaluation, and proficiency testing.
    • Built on risk-based thinking; Option A/B for management systems (standalone or ISO 9001-aligned).
    • Leads to accreditation by bodies like ILAC signatories, attesting technical competence in defined scopes.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Enables market access, regulatory acceptance, and international result recognition.
    • Mitigates risks from invalid results in safety-critical domains.
    • Builds stakeholder trust via demonstrated impartiality and traceability.
    • Provides competitive edge through credible, defensible outputs.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased PDCA approach: gap analysis, documentation, technical validation, audits.
    • Suited for labs across industries; requires metrology expertise, PT participation.
    • Involves accreditation assessments with witnessed activities.

    MAS TRM Details

    What It Is

    MAS Technology Risk Management (TRM) Guidelines (January 2021) are supervisory guidelines issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore for financial institutions. They provide principles-based guidance on managing technology and cyber risks, emphasizing governance, controls, and resilience to protect confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of systems and data. The risk-based approach requires proportional implementation based on institution size, complexity, and exposure.

    Key Components

    • 15 main sections covering governance, risk frameworks, secure development, IT operations, resilience, access controls, cryptography, cyber defense, testing, and audit.
    • Synthesized 12 core principles like board accountability, asset classification, third-party oversight, and defense-in-depth.
    • No fixed controls; focuses on outcomes with independent assurance via audit.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Financial institutions adopt TRM for regulatory supervision, avoiding fines and enforcement. It enhances resilience, reduces cyber incidents, builds customer trust, and supports digital transformation securely.

    Implementation Overview

    Involves asset inventories, risk assessments, control design across lifecycle, testing regimes, and third-party due diligence. Applies to all MAS-supervised FIs; phased rollout (6-24 months) with board oversight and continuous monitoring. No formal certification, but MAS reviews observance.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISO 17025
    Laboratory competence, testing/calibration validity
    MAS TRM
    Financial institutions' technology/cyber risks

    Industry

    ISO 17025
    Testing/calibration labs globally
    MAS TRM
    Singapore financial institutions

    Nature

    ISO 17025
    Voluntary accreditation standard
    MAS TRM
    Supervisory guidelines with enforcement

    Testing

    ISO 17025
    Proficiency testing, method validation, audits
    MAS TRM
    Penetration testing, vulnerability scans, DR tests

    Penalties

    ISO 17025
    Loss of accreditation
    MAS TRM
    Fines, license revocation, prohibitions

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 17025 and MAS TRM

    ISO 17025 FAQ

    MAS TRM FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages