What is the primary objective of **ISO 19600**?

**ISO 19600 provides guidelines for establishing, developing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving an effective compliance management system (CMS).** Published in 2014 as a principles-based, scalable framework, it applies to all organization types and sizes, emphasizing proportionality to structure, nature, and complexity. The standard uses a Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle and high-level structure, focusing on translating compliance obligations—laws, regulations, voluntary codes, and contracts—into processes, controls, and culture via governance principles like board access, compliance function independence, and adequate resources.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 19600**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 19600, as it provides non-mandatory guidelines rather than requirements.** It targets any public, private, or non-profit entity seeking a structured CMS, scalable by size, structure, nature, and complexity. Professionals such as CCOs, boards, and compliance officers use it voluntarily for benchmarking, internal governance, and demonstrating good practices to regulators, courts, or stakeholders, with integration into existing management processes recommended while preserving independence.

Does **ISO 19600** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 19600 does not require external audits or third-party certification, as it is a guideline standard without mandatory requirements.** Organizations conduct planned internal audits per Clause 9.2, using systematic, independent processes aligned with ISO 19011. It guides self-assessment of CMS effectiveness through monitoring, management reviews, and continual improvement, enabling internal benchmarking but not formal certification—unlike its successor ISO 37301.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 19600** be performed?

**ISO 19600 requires compliance risk assessments to be performed initially and reassessed whenever changes or issues occur.** Clause 4.6 mandates ongoing identification, analysis, and evaluation of compliance risks, with processes for monitoring new/changed obligations (Clause 4.5). Performance evaluation (Clause 9) includes continual monitoring, planned audits at intervals, and management reviews considering performance data, nonconformities, and changes, ensuring dynamic CMS suitability.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 19600**?

**There are no direct consequences for non-compliance with ISO 19600 itself, as it imposes no legal or certifiable requirements.** However, failure to implement its recommended CMS practices exposes organizations to breaches of underlying obligations (e.g., laws, contracts), potentially resulting in regulator penalties, fines, reputational damage, or judicial scrutiny. Courts may consider CMS absence when assessing penalties, emphasizing Clause 10's continual improvement to mitigate such risks.

Can **ISO 19600** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 19600 can be mapped to other international frameworks sharing its high-level structure and PDCA logic.** Its clauses (context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement) align with ISO management system standards, enabling integration with processes like quality or risk management while maintaining compliance independence (introduction guidance). This supports unified governance without silos.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 19600**?

**The first step is determining the CMS scope and organizational context per Clause 4.** This involves understanding internal/external issues (Clause 4.1), identifying interested parties and needs (Clause 4.2), and documenting boundaries as readily available information (Clause 4.3), ensuring proportionality and alignment with governance principles like compliance function independence (Clause 4.4).

What is the primary objective of **AS9110C**?

**AS9110C's primary objective is to enable aviation maintenance organizations to consistently provide products and services meeting customer and applicable statutory/regulatory requirements while enhancing customer satisfaction through effective QMS application and continual improvement.** It incorporates ISO 9001:2015's Annex SL structure (Clauses 4–10) with maintenance-specific additions like configuration management, product safety, counterfeit parts prevention, traceability, preservation, and human factors controls to ensure continuing airworthiness.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **AS9110C**?

**AS9110C applies to aviation maintenance organizations, including repair stations, MRO providers, and OEMs with autonomous MRO operations performing maintenance, repair, overhaul, or continuing airworthiness services.** It targets civil and military contexts regardless of size, where primary business involves compliant products/services; certification supports IAQG OASIS listing and customer/regulatory demands, though not legally mandatory unless specified in contracts or approvals.

Does **AS9110C** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, AS9110C requires third-party certification through accredited bodies, demonstrated via Stage 1 (documentation review) and Stage 2 (on-site effectiveness audit) processes.** The QMS must be fully operational for at least three months, including a full internal audit cycle and management review, before initial certification; ongoing surveillance audits occur annually, with recertification every three years.

How often should an assessment for **AS9110C** be performed?

**AS9110C requires internal audits at planned intervals based on process risk, status, and importance, with full coverage at least annually.** Management reviews occur at predetermined intervals aligned with business cycles, using performance data; external surveillance audits are typically annual post-certification, ensuring continual suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **AS9110C**?

**Non-compliance with AS9110C risks loss of certification, exclusion from IAQG OASIS, contract ineligibility with OEMs/airlines, regulatory sanctions (e.g., FAA/EASA Part 145 certificate suspension), and safety incidents from poor configuration/traceability.** It leads to rework, AOG events, fines, litigation, and reputational damage, undermining continuing airworthiness.

Can **AS9110C** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, AS9110C aligns directly with ISO 9001:2015 via its Annex SL high-level structure and shares terminology like "documented information" and "external providers."** IAQG correlation matrices facilitate mapping to aviation regulations (e.g., FAA/EASA Part 145), enabling integrated QMS without exclusions unless justified in scope.

What is the first step to begin implementing **AS9110C**?

**The first step is to define the QMS scope, determine internal/external issues (Clause 4), and conduct a gap analysis against Clauses 4–10 using IAQG checklists.** Secure executive sponsorship, map regulatory/customer requirements, and justify any non-applicable requirements to establish boundaries and prioritize risks.

ISO 19600 vs AS9110C

Standards Comparison

ISO 19600

Voluntary

2014

Guidelines for compliance management systems

AS9110C

Mandatory

2016

International standard for aviation maintenance quality management.

Quick Verdict

ISO 19600 provides guidelines for compliance management systems across all organizations, while AS9110C is a certifiable quality standard for aerospace maintenance. Companies adopt ISO 19600 for CMS frameworks and AS9110C for MRO certification and regulatory compliance.

Compliance Management

ISO 19600

ISO 19600:2014 Compliance management systems — Guidelines

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

High-level structure with PDCA cycle
Governance principles for independent compliance function
Risk-based compliance obligations identification
Proportionality scalable to organization size
Integration with other management systems

Quality Management

AS9110C

AS9110C: Quality Management Systems for Aviation Maintenance

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Configuration management and product traceability controls
Counterfeit and suspect parts prevention program
Risk-based thinking in operational planning
Human factors consideration in root cause analysis
Continuing airworthiness and maintenance release requirements

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

ISO 19600 Details

What It Is

ISO 19600:2014 — Compliance management systems — Guidelines is an international standard providing non-certifiable guidance for establishing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving a compliance management system (CMS). It uses a risk-based, principles-based approach applicable to all organization types, emphasizing PDCA cycle and high-level structure for integration.

Key Components

Core clauses: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
**Principlesgood governance, proportionality, transparency, sustainability.
Governance focus: compliance function independence, board access, adequate resources.
No fixed controls; scalable guidance, not certifiable (superseded by ISO 37301).

Why Organizations Use It

Mitigates compliance risks (legal, regulatory, contractual obligations).
Enhances governance, culture, operational efficiency.
Builds stakeholder trust, supports penalty mitigation in courts.
Strategic enabler for integration with risk/quality systems.

Implementation Overview

Phased: context analysis, risk assessment, controls, monitoring.
Scalable to size/complexity; no certification.
Universal applicability; voluntary adoption via internal benchmarking.

AS9110C Details

What It Is

AS9110C (AS9110:2016 Rev C) is an international aerospace quality management system (QMS) standard specifically tailored for aviation maintenance organizations (MROs), such as repair stations and continuing airworthiness providers. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 using Annex SL high-level structure, emphasizing risk-based thinking, PDCA cycles, and aviation-specific controls for safety and airworthiness.

Key Components

Core clauses 4–10 covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, and improvement.
Aviation additions: configuration management, counterfeit parts prevention, human factors, traceability, preservation, and external provider controls.
No fixed number of controls; focuses on documented information and process effectiveness.
Certification model via IAQG-accredited bodies with Stage 1/2 audits and OASIS listing.

Why Organizations Use It

Meets customer/OEM contracts and regulatory alignments (FAA/EASA Part 145).
Mitigates safety risks, ensures continuing airworthiness, improves on-time delivery.
Enhances market access, operational efficiency, and stakeholder trust.

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, certification (6-12 months typical).
Applies to MROs of all sizes globally; requires operational maturity pre-certification.

Key Differences

Aspect	ISO 19600	AS9110C
Scope	Compliance management systems guidelines	Aerospace maintenance quality management
Industry	All organizations worldwide	Aerospace MRO organizations globally
Nature	Non-certifiable guidelines (withdrawn)	Certifiable QMS standard
Testing	Internal audits and reviews	Certification audits, internal audits
Penalties	No legal penalties	Loss of certification, regulatory risks

Scope

ISO 19600

Compliance management systems guidelines

AS9110C

Aerospace maintenance quality management

Industry

ISO 19600

All organizations worldwide

AS9110C

Aerospace MRO organizations globally

Nature

ISO 19600

Non-certifiable guidelines (withdrawn)

AS9110C

Certifiable QMS standard

Testing

ISO 19600

Internal audits and reviews

AS9110C

Certification audits, internal audits

Penalties

ISO 19600

No legal penalties

AS9110C

Loss of certification, regulatory risks

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ISO 19600 and AS9110C

ISO 19600 FAQ

AS9110C FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2

Use CIS Controls v8.1 as your compliance on-ramp. Map one security program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2 without duplicating work via practical mapp

Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence

Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance

Real-World ISO 27701 Success: Synthesized Case Studies, Metrics, and Lessons for Privacy Resilience

Real-world ISO 27701 success from Tribeca, Kocho: DSAR efficiency gains, risk score reductions, certification ROI. Synthesized metrics prove privacy resilience

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

COBIT vs ISO 31000

Discover COBIT vs ISO 31000: IT governance framework meets risk management gold standard. Align IT with business goals, optimize compliance & resilience. Compare now!

C-TPAT vs AS9120B

Compare C-TPAT vs AS9120B: CBP's supply chain security for trusted trade vs aerospace distributor QMS. Uncover key differences, MSC criteria, benefits & strategies to boost compliance & resilience. Dive in now!

FedRAMP vs ISO 28000

Compare FedRAMP vs ISO 28000: FedRAMP secures federal clouds with NIST baselines; ISO 28000 builds resilient supply chains. Uncover differences, costs, and pick the ideal path for compliance now.

ISO 19600

AS9110C

Quick Verdict

ISO 19600

Key Features

AS9110C

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

ISO 19600 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

AS9110C Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

ISO 19600 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 19600?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 19600?

Does ISO 19600 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 19600 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 19600?

Can ISO 19600 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 19600?

AS9110C FAQ

What is the primary objective of AS9110C?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with AS9110C?

Does AS9110C require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for AS9110C be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with AS9110C?

Can AS9110C be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing AS9110C?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2

Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence

Real-World ISO 27701 Success: Synthesized Case Studies, Metrics, and Lessons for Privacy Resilience

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

COBIT vs ISO 31000

C-TPAT vs AS9120B

FedRAMP vs ISO 28000