Standards Comparison

    ISO 19600

    Voluntary
    2014

    International guidelines for compliance management systems

    VS

    Basel III

    Mandatory
    2010

    Global framework for bank capital, leverage, liquidity standards.

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 19600 provides voluntary CMS guidelines for all organizations, embedding compliance into culture. Basel III mandates capital, leverage, and liquidity rules for banks. Companies adopt ISO 19600 for governance benchmarking; banks follow Basel III to ensure financial resilience and avoid penalties.

    Compliance Management

    ISO 19600

    ISO 19600:2014 Compliance management systems — Guidelines

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Explicit governance principles for compliance independence
    • High-level structure with PDCA cycle
    • Scalable to any organization size
    • Risk-based compliance obligations identification
    • Integration with other management systems
    Financial Risk Management

    Basel III

    Basel III: Finalising post-crisis reforms

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Strengthened CET1 capital requirements and buffers
    • Non-risk-based leverage ratio backstop
    • Liquidity Coverage Ratio for 30-day stress
    • Net Stable Funding Ratio for structural resilience
    • Enhanced Pillar 3 RWA comparability disclosures

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 19600 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 19600:2014 — Compliance management systems — Guidelines is a non-certifiable international guidance standard. It provides scalable, principles-based advice for organizations to establish, implement, evaluate, maintain, and improve a Compliance Management System (CMS). The primary scope covers all organization types and sizes, using a risk-based, PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) approach aligned with ISO high-level structure.

    Key Components

    • Main pillars: context/scope, leadership/governance, planning/risk, support/resources, operation/controls, performance evaluation, improvement.
    • Core principles: good governance (independence, direct board access, resources), proportionality, transparency, sustainability.
    • No fixed controls; flexible guidance for benchmarking.
    • Self-assessment model, no formal certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mitigates compliance risks (legal, contractual, voluntary obligations).
    • Enhances governance, culture, and integration with systems like ISO 9001/14001.
    • Builds regulator defensibility, reduces penalties, improves efficiency.
    • Boosts stakeholder trust, reputation, competitive edge.
    • Voluntary but strategically vital post-withdrawal (replaced by ISO 37301).

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, policy design, controls/training, monitoring/audits.
    • Applicable universally; proportionate to size/complexity.
    • No audits required; internal reviews suffice. (178 words)

    Basel III Details

    What It Is

    Basel III is the global regulatory framework issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) for bank prudential standards. It addresses post-financial crisis weaknesses in capital quality, leverage, and liquidity through a risk-based, multi-metric approach combining risk-weighted assets (RWA), non-risk-based measures, and standardized requirements.

    Key Components

    • **Three PillarsPillar 1 (capital, leverage, LCR, NSFR), Pillar 2 (supervisory review/ICAAP), Pillar 3 (disclosures).
    • Core elements: CET1 (4.5%), Tier 1 (6%), total capital (8%), 2.5% conservation buffer, 3% leverage ratio, LCR/NSFR at 100%.
    • Built on revised RWA methods, output floor (72.5%), and enhanced disclosures (KM1, LR1, CDC).
    • Compliance via national implementation, no central certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for internationally active banks to ensure resilience, constrain leverage, and maintain liquidity.
    • Enhances risk management, reduces model risk, improves comparability.
    • Builds stakeholder trust, avoids penalties, supports strategic balance-sheet optimization.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased enterprise transformation: governance, data systems, models, training.
    • Applies to large banks globally; varies by jurisdiction (e.g., EU CRR3, US Endgame).
    • Involves QIS, parallel runs, supervisory engagement; ongoing monitoring required.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISO 19600
    Compliance management systems guidelines
    Basel III
    Bank capital, leverage, liquidity standards

    Industry

    ISO 19600
    All organizations worldwide
    Basel III
    Internationally active banks

    Nature

    ISO 19600
    Voluntary guidelines, non-certifiable
    Basel III
    Mandatory prudential standards

    Testing

    ISO 19600
    Internal audits, management reviews
    Basel III
    Supervisory stress tests, ICAAP

    Penalties

    ISO 19600
    No legal penalties
    Basel III
    Fines, asset caps, enforcement actions

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 19600 and Basel III

    ISO 19600 FAQ

    Basel III FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages