ISO 19600
Guidelines for establishing compliance management systems
ISO 22301
International standard for business continuity management systems
Quick Verdict
ISO 19600 offers guidelines for compliance management systems across all organizations, while ISO 22301 specifies certifiable requirements for business continuity. Companies adopt 19600 for governance frameworks and 22301 for resilient operations against disruptions.
ISO 19600
ISO 19600:2014 Compliance management systems — Guidelines
Key Features
- Explicit governance principles for compliance independence
- PDCA cycle and high-level management structure
- Risk-based identification of broad obligations
- Scalable guidelines for all organizations
- Integration with other ISO management systems
ISO 22301
ISO 22301:2019 Business continuity management systems Requirements
Key Features
- PDCA cycle for continual BCMS improvement
- Business Impact Analysis prioritizing critical functions
- Risk assessment integrated with operational controls
- Annex SL alignment for ISO 27001 integration
- Mandatory testing exercises and internal audits
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 19600 Details
What It Is
ISO 19600:2014 provides guidelines (not requirements) for establishing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving compliance management systems (CMS). It uses a risk-based, principles-driven approach applicable to all organizations, emphasizing proportionality to size, structure, and complexity.
Key Components
- Core pillars: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- Built on PDCA cycle and Annex SL high-level structure.
- Governance principles: compliance function independence, direct board access, adequate resources.
- No certification; voluntary alignment and benchmarking.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates compliance risks (legal, contractual, voluntary obligations).
- Enhances governance, culture, and integration with other systems (e.g., ISO 9001, 14001).
- Builds regulator defensibility, stakeholder trust, operational efficiency.
- Strategic enabler for penalties reduction and market access.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, policy design, controls, training, monitoring.
- Scalable for SMEs (6-12 months) to enterprises (12-36 months).
- Universal applicability; no audits required, but internal reviews recommended. (178 words)
ISO 22301 Details
What It Is
ISO 22301:2019 is the international standard specifying requirements for a Business Continuity Management System (BCMS). It provides a framework to protect against, respond to, and recover from disruptions to critical products and services. Adopting the Annex SL high-level structure and PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle, it uses a risk-based approach aligned with standards like ISO 27001.
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10 cover context, leadership, planning (BIA/RA), support, operations (strategies/testing), performance evaluation (audits/reviews), and improvement.
- No prescriptive controls; focuses on tailored processes, documented information, competence, and exercises.
- Certifiable via accredited bodies with 3-year cycles and annual surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives resilience against cyberattacks, disasters, and supply failures; reduces downtime/losses, lowers insurance premiums, ensures regulatory compliance (e.g., NIS). Builds stakeholder trust, enhances competitiveness, enables integrated management systems for holistic protection.
Implementation Overview
Gap analysis, leadership buy-in, BIA/RA, policy/training, testing, audits. Suited for all sizes/sectors globally; accelerated (e.g., 6 months) via platforms like ISMS.online; two-stage certification audits.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 19600 | ISO 22301 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Compliance obligations and risks | Business continuity and disruptions |
| Industry | All organizations worldwide | All sectors, high-risk industries |
| Nature | Guidelines, non-certifiable | Requirements, certifiable standard |
| Testing | Internal audits, management reviews | Exercises, simulations, audits |
| Penalties | No formal penalties | Loss of certification |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 19600 and ISO 22301
ISO 19600 FAQ
ISO 22301 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
CMMC Scoping Mastery for Defense Supply Chains: Enclave Mapping, Subcontractor Flow-Down, and CUI Inventory Blueprint
Master CMMC scoping for DIB: delineate FCI/CUI boundaries, segment enclaves, manage subcontractor flow-down. Prevent 80% assessment failures with SSP templates,
HITRUST CSF MyCSF Platform Mastery: Infograph of Evidence Tagging Workflows and Top 5 Maturity Tier Acceleration Takeaways
Master MyCSF platform with infographics on evidence tagging for 1,400+ HITRUST controls across 19 domains. Cut documentation by 30%, boost Measured/Managed tier
NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity
Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 9001 vs PDPA
Discover ISO 9001 vs PDPA: Global QMS leader (1M+ certs) meets data privacy standards. Boost compliance, efficiency, customer trust & continual improvement now!
CMMC vs ISO 19600
Compare CMMC vs ISO 19600: DoD cybersecurity tiers for DIB vs risk-based compliance guidelines. Unlock key diffs, implementation strategies & benefits for robust security. Explore now!
RoHS vs TOGAF
Explore RoHS vs TOGAF: EU hazardous substance rules for EEE compliance meet TOGAF's ADM framework. Uncover key differences, strategies & best practices. Boost governance now!