What is the primary objective of **ISO 20000**?

**ISO 20000's primary objective is to specify requirements for establishing, implementing, operating, monitoring, reviewing, maintaining, and continually improving a service management system (SMS).** ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018 structures these requirements across Clauses 4–10 using the Annex SL high-level structure, covering context of the organization, leadership, planning, support, operation (including service portfolio, relationship, supply/demand, design/transition, resolution/fulfilment, and assurance), performance evaluation, and improvement via Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 20000**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 20000, as it is a voluntary international standard for service management systems.** Professionally, it applies to any service provider—regardless of size or industry—delivering IT-enabled, cloud, managed, or business process services, including enterprises seeking market differentiation, contractual assurances, or integration with governance practices.

Does **ISO 20000** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 20000-1 certification requires external audits by an accredited certification body through a two-stage process.** Stage 1 assesses documentation and readiness; Stage 2 verifies implementation effectiveness via evidence review, interviews, and process observation. Certification is valid for three years, with annual surveillance audits and recertification thereafter.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 20000** be performed?

**ISO 20000 requires internal audits at planned intervals and top management reviews at planned intervals to evaluate SMS performance.** Organizations conduct full internal audits typically annually, with surveillance audits by certification bodies annually post-certification and recertification every three years, feeding into PDCA-driven continual improvement.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 20000**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 20000 results in certification denial, suspension, or withdrawal by the accredited body.** Internally, it leads to operational risks like service outages, SLA breaches, and supplier failures; externally, lost tenders, customer distrust, and heightened regulatory exposure in sectors demanding service reliability.

Can **ISO 20000** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 20000-1:2018's Annex SL structure enables direct mapping to other management system standards.** Clause alignment supports integration with frameworks like ITIL for practices (e.g., incident/problem management) and operational models such as DevOps, Agile, Lean, SIAM, or VeriSM, while maintaining flexibility in implementation.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 20000**?

**The first step to implement ISO 20000 is determining the context of the organization per Clause 4, including internal/external issues, interested parties, and SMS scope.** This informs leadership commitment (Clause 5), risk-based planning (Clause 6), and a gap analysis against Clauses 4–10 to prioritize remediation.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 13485**?

**ISO 13485:2016 specifies requirements for a quality management system (QMS) enabling organizations to consistently provide medical devices and related services that meet customer and applicable regulatory requirements.** It applies across the device lifecycle, from design and development through production, distribution, installation, servicing, and decommissioning. The standard emphasizes documented processes, risk-based controls, validation, traceability, and post-market surveillance to ensure device safety and performance, distinguishing it as a regulatory-focused framework.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 13485**?

**ISO 13485 applies to organizations whose activities involve one or more stages of the medical device lifecycle.** This includes manufacturers (design and production), contract manufacturers, suppliers of services (sterilization, calibration), distributors, importers, and service providers (installation, maintenance). Organizations must identify their regulatory roles and incorporate applicable requirements into the QMS, with no specific employee or revenue thresholds but scope exclusions justified in the quality manual, particularly from Clause 7.

Does **ISO 13485** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 13485 certification involves external audits by accredited certification bodies but is voluntary, not mandated by the standard.** The process includes Stage 1 (documentation review) and Stage 2 (implementation audit), followed by annual surveillance and recertification every three years. While not legally required, certification demonstrates QMS conformity and is often expected by regulators, notified bodies, and supply chain partners for market access.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 13485** be performed?

**Internal audits for ISO 13485 must be conducted at planned intervals to verify QMS effectiveness, with frequency determined by process risk.** Management reviews occur at planned intervals, incorporating audit results, complaints, CAPA, and regulatory changes. External surveillance audits typically occur annually post-certification, with full recertification every three years. Records must demonstrate ongoing conformity, with retention at least the device lifetime or two years post-release.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 13485**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 13485 risks regulatory enforcement, product holds, recalls, fines, market withdrawal, and certification suspension.** Certification bodies issue nonconformities requiring corrective actions; unresolved major issues lead to failed audits. Regulators like EU Notified Bodies or FDA may cite gaps in inspections, resulting in warning letters, import alerts, or legal liability, as the standard underpins QMS expectations in regimes like EU MDR.

Can **ISO 13485** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 13485 provides Annex B mapping to ISO 9001:2015 but excludes certain elements for regulatory focus.** It aligns with ISO 14971 (risk management), IEC 62366-1 (usability), and supports regulatory frameworks like EU MDR/IVDR via clause mappings. Organizations cannot claim ISO 9001 conformity solely from ISO 13485, but its process approach promotes compatibility with complementary standards without full cross-certification.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 13485**?

**The first step is establishing the QMS scope per Clause 4.1, documenting processes, interactions, risk-based controls, and any exclusions with justification.** Identify applicable regulatory requirements, roles (e.g., manufacturer), and outsourced processes requiring quality agreements. Develop the quality manual outlining scope, procedures, and medical device files to build an auditable foundation before addressing Clauses 5-8.

ISO 20000 vs ISO 13485

Standards Comparison

ISO 20000

Voluntary

2018

International standard for service management systems

ISO 13485

Mandatory

2016

International standard for medical device quality management systems

Quick Verdict

ISO 20000 certifies service management for IT/service providers ensuring reliable delivery, while ISO 13485 mandates QMS for medical device makers guaranteeing safety and regulatory compliance. Companies adopt them for certification, trust, and market access.

IT Service Management

ISO 20000

ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018 Service management system requirements

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Annex SL alignment enables integration with ISO 9001, 27001
Comprehensive Clause 8 service lifecycle operational domains
PDCA-driven performance evaluation and continual improvement
Certifiable requirements for SMS with flexible implementation
Leadership commitment and risk-based service planning

Quality Management

ISO 13485

ISO 13485:2016 Medical devices Quality management systems

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Risk-based controls for device safety and regulatory compliance
Design and development validation with traceability
Post-market surveillance and complaint handling
Supplier evaluation and outsourcing management
Process validation and sterile device requirements

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

ISO 20000 Details

What It Is

ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018 is the certifiable international standard for establishing and operating a service management system (SMS). It specifies auditable requirements for managing the full service lifecycle—planning, design, transition, delivery, and improvement—using a risk-based, PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) approach aligned with Annex SL high-level structure.

Key Components

Clauses 4-10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
Clause 8 details operational domains: service portfolio, relationships, supply/demand, design/transition, resolution, assurance.
Core processes include incident/problem management, change/release, configuration, availability/continuity, security.
Built on flexible "what-not-how" principles; certifiable via accredited audits.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives service reliability, customer trust, risk reduction (e.g., 50% certificate growth).
Enables market differentiation, procurement wins, integration with ISO 9001/27001.
Voluntary but supports regulatory compliance, operational efficiency, stakeholder assurance.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, design, deployment, audits (Stage 1/2, surveillance).
Applies to all sizes/industries; 12-18 months typical with tools/training.
Requires leadership, evidence-based processes, continual improvement.

ISO 13485 Details

What It Is

ISO 13485:2016 is the international standard titled Medical devices — Quality management systems — Requirements for regulatory purposes. It provides a certifiable framework for organizations in the medical device lifecycle, emphasizing risk-based controls to ensure devices meet customer and regulatory requirements consistently.

Key Components

Organized into Clauses 4–8: QMS/documentation (4), management responsibility (5), resources (6), product realization (7), measurement/improvement (8).
Focuses on design controls, validation, traceability, supplier management, post-market surveillance, and CAPA.
Built on process approach, aligned with ISO 9001 but enhanced for regulatory needs like ISO 14971 risk management.
Third-party certification via accredited bodies with stage audits and surveillance.

Why Organizations Use It

Enables market access (EU MDR, FDA QMSR by 2026), reduces risks/recalls.
Builds stakeholder trust, supply chain assurance, operational efficiency.
Strategic for scaling, M&A, international expansion.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, documentation, training, validation, audits.
Applies to manufacturers, suppliers, SMEs to multinationals globally.
Involves eQMS, cross-functional teams; certification every 3 years.

Key Differences

Aspect	ISO 20000	ISO 13485
Scope	Service management systems, IT/service lifecycle	Medical device QMS, device lifecycle compliance
Industry	All service providers, IT, cloud, global	Medical devices, healthcare supply chain, global
Nature	Voluntary certifiable management standard	Voluntary certifiable regulatory QMS standard
Testing	Internal audits, Stage 1/2 certification audits	Internal audits, process validation, design verification
Penalties	Loss of certification, market trust impact	Certification loss, regulatory enforcement risks

Scope

ISO 20000

Service management systems, IT/service lifecycle

ISO 13485

Medical device QMS, device lifecycle compliance

Industry

ISO 20000

All service providers, IT, cloud, global

ISO 13485

Medical devices, healthcare supply chain, global

Nature

ISO 20000

Voluntary certifiable management standard

ISO 13485

Voluntary certifiable regulatory QMS standard

Testing

ISO 20000

Internal audits, Stage 1/2 certification audits

ISO 13485

Internal audits, process validation, design verification

Penalties

ISO 20000

Loss of certification, market trust impact

ISO 13485

Certification loss, regulatory enforcement risks

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ISO 20000 and ISO 13485

ISO 20000 FAQ

ISO 13485 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

One Step at a Time - a 6 Month Plan to Live and Breath DORA

Achieve DORA compliance in 6 months with our detailed plan. Learn implementation sequence, starting steps, pitfalls to avoid, and accelerators for success. Toug

HITRUST CSF MyCSF Platform Mastery: Infograph of Evidence Tagging Workflows and Top 5 Maturity Tier Acceleration Takeaways

Master MyCSF platform with infographics on evidence tagging for 1,400+ HITRUST controls across 19 domains. Cut documentation by 30%, boost Measured/Managed tier

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows

Explore intuitive compliance software that automates workflows, simplifies onboarding, and reduces stress. Cut non-compliance costs 3x and boost efficiency for

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

UAE PDPL vs EU AI Act

Compare UAE PDPL vs EU AI Act: Key diffs in data privacy, high-risk rules, DPIAs/DPOs & transfers. Master compliance for UAE-EU success now!

COBIT vs FedRAMP

Discover COBIT vs FedRAMP: IT governance framework meets federal cloud security standard. Key differences in controls, baselines & implementation for compliance wins. Compare now!

RoHS vs NIST 800-171

Compare RoHS vs NIST 800-171: EU hazardous substance bans in EEE vs US CUI cybersecurity controls. Unlock compliance strategies for global supply chains. Read now!

ISO 20000

ISO 13485

Quick Verdict

ISO 20000

Key Features

ISO 13485

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

ISO 20000 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 13485 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

ISO 20000 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 20000?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 20000?

Does ISO 20000 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 20000 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 20000?

Can ISO 20000 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 20000?

ISO 13485 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 13485?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 13485?

Does ISO 13485 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 13485 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 13485?

Can ISO 13485 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 13485?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

One Step at a Time - a 6 Month Plan to Live and Breath DORA

HITRUST CSF MyCSF Platform Mastery: Infograph of Evidence Tagging Workflows and Top 5 Maturity Tier Acceleration Takeaways

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

UAE PDPL vs EU AI Act

COBIT vs FedRAMP

RoHS vs NIST 800-171