Standards Comparison

    ISO 22000

    Voluntary
    2018

    International standard for food safety management systems

    VS

    BRC

    Voluntary
    2022

    Global standard for food safety management certification

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 22000 offers flexible FSMS governance for any food chain organization globally, while BRC provides prescriptive site controls and HACCP for manufacturers targeting retailers. Companies adopt ISO for integration and scalability; BRC for market access and buyer trust.

    Food Safety

    ISO 22000

    ISO 22000:2018 Food safety management systems

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Adopts High-Level Structure for integrated management systems
    • Uses two nested PDCA cycles for strategic and operational control
    • Integrates HACCP principles with full management system requirements
    • Categorizes controls systematically as PRP, OPRP, or CCP
    • Emphasizes interactive communication across food chain
    Food Safety

    BRC

    BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Senior management commitment and culture plan
    • Codex HACCP-based food safety system
    • Fundamental non-negotiable certification requirements
    • Site standards with risk zoning segregation
    • Expanded environmental monitoring and food defence

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 22000 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 22000:2018 is an international certification standard for Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS). It applies to any organization in the food chain, providing a systematic framework to prevent food safety hazards, ensure compliance with regulations and customer needs, and enable effective communication. Its risk-based approach uses two nested **PDCA cyclesone for overall FSMS governance and one for operational hazard controls.

    Key Components

    • Clauses 4-10 follow ISO's High-Level Structure (HLS).
    • Core elements: PRPs, hazard analysis, CCPs/OPRPs, traceability, verification, internal audits.
    • Built on HACCP principles integrated with management system discipline.
    • Requires documented information, competence, and leadership accountability; certification via accredited bodies.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mitigates recalls, litigation, and brand damage.
    • Meets voluntary but market-driven needs for GFSI schemes like FSSC 22000.
    • Enhances supply chain trust, operational efficiency, and integration with ISO 9001/14001.
    • Builds stakeholder confidence through auditable assurance.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, PRPs/hazard planning, training, audits, certification.
    • Scalable for SMEs to multinationals across food sectors globally.
    • Involves 6-18 months, cross-functional teams, and ongoing surveillance audits.

    BRC Details

    What It Is

    The BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety is a GFSI-benchmarked, third-party certification framework for food manufacturers, processors, and packers. It ensures product safety, legality, authenticity, and quality via a structured system combining senior management commitment and a Codex HACCP-based food safety plan, supported by prerequisite programs like GMP/GHP.

    Key Components

    • Nine core clauses spanning governance, HACCP, site standards, product/process controls, personnel, and traded products.
    • Fundamental requirements (e.g., internal audits, traceability, allergen management) critical for certification.
    • Risk-based approach with environmental monitoring, food defense, and root cause analysis.
    • Annual audits (announced/unannounced) with performance grading (AA/A/B/C/D).

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Meets retailer mandates for supply chain access.
    • Reduces audits, evidences due diligence, mitigates recall risks (allergens, pathogens, labelling).
    • Builds trust, enhances reputation, supports regulatory compliance (e.g., FSMA).

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, documentation, training, internal audits, certification.
    • Applies globally to manufacturing sites; 6-12 months typical; requires multidisciplinary teams and CAPA.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISO 22000
    Full FSMS with governance, hazard control, PRPs across food chain
    BRC
    Food safety, quality, site standards, HACCP for manufacturing/packing

    Industry

    ISO 22000
    All food chain organizations worldwide, any size
    BRC
    Food manufacturers, packers, retailers globally, scalable to SMEs

    Nature

    ISO 22000
    Voluntary ISO management system certification standard
    BRC
    Voluntary GFSI-benchmarked retailer-driven certification scheme

    Testing

    ISO 22000
    Internal audits, management review, 3-year recertification
    BRC
    Annual site audits, announced/unannounced, internal audits required

    Penalties

    ISO 22000
    Loss of certification, no legal penalties
    BRC
    Certification withdrawal, grade downgrade, buyer delisting

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 22000 and BRC

    ISO 22000 FAQ

    BRC FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages