Standards Comparison

    ISO 22000

    Voluntary
    2018

    International standard for food safety management systems

    VS

    U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

    Mandatory
    2023

    U.S. SEC rules mandating cybersecurity incident disclosure and governance

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 22000 provides certifiable food safety management for global food chains, while U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules mandate rapid incident disclosure and governance reporting for public companies. Food firms seek certification; public firms ensure investor transparency.

    Food Safety

    ISO 22000

    ISO 22000:2018 Food safety management systems

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Adopts High-Level Structure for integrated management systems
    • Dual PDCA cycles for organizational and operational control
    • Integrates HACCP principles with full management system
    • Systematic categorization of PRPs, OPRPs, and CCPs
    • Interactive communication as core hazard control mechanism
    Capital Markets

    U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

    Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, and Incident Disclosure

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Four-business-day disclosure of material cybersecurity incidents
    • Annual risk management, strategy, and governance disclosures
    • Inline XBRL tagging for machine-readable data
    • Board oversight and management expertise requirements
    • Inclusion of third-party risks in processes

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 22000 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 22000:2018 is the international certification standard for Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS). It provides a framework for organizations in the food chain to ensure safe products through hazard prevention, regulatory compliance, and effective communication. The standard uses a risk-based approach with **two nested PDCA cyclesone for overall FSMS governance and another for operational hazard controls.

    Key Components

    • Clauses 4-10 follow the High-Level Structure (HLS) for integration with other ISO standards.
    • Core elements: PRPs, hazard analysis, CCPs/OPRPs, traceability, verification, and emergency preparedness.
    • Built on HACCP principles integrated with management system requirements.
    • Voluntary certification via accredited bodies with staged audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Provides market access, supplier qualification, and GFSI alignment (e.g., FSSC 22000). Reduces recalls, enhances resilience, and builds stakeholder trust through auditable assurance.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: gap analysis, PRP development, hazard control planning, training, internal audits. Applicable to all food chain organizations; scalable for SMEs to multinationals. Certification involves stage 1/2 audits, annual surveillance.

    U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules Details

    What It Is

    U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules (Release No. 33-11216), adopted in 2023, is a federal regulation amending Regulation S-K and Forms 8-K/10-K. It mandates standardized disclosures for public companies on cybersecurity incidents, risk management, strategy, and governance. The risk-based approach requires timely reporting of material incidents and annual process descriptions without prescribing specific controls.

    Key Components

    • **Incident disclosureForm 8-K Item 1.05 requires reporting material cybersecurity incidents within four business days.
    • **Periodic disclosuresRegulation S-K Item 106 covers risk processes, strategy impacts, board oversight, and management roles.
    • **Structured dataInline XBRL tagging for comparability.
    • Built on securities-law materiality principles; no fixed controls or certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Enhances investor protection via timely, uniform information; integrates cyber risk into disclosure controls; mitigates enforcement risks (e.g., Yahoo, SolarWinds cases); builds stakeholder trust and supports capital efficiency.

    Implementation Overview

    Cross-functional gap analysis, materiality playbooks, incident workflows, governance documentation. Applies to all Exchange Act registrants (domestic/FPIs); phased compliance from Dec 2023; no external certification but SEC enforcement applies.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISO 22000
    Food safety management across food chain
    U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    Cybersecurity incident disclosure and governance

    Industry

    ISO 22000
    Food production, processing, distribution globally
    U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    Public companies, all sectors, U.S. SEC registrants

    Nature

    ISO 22000
    Voluntary certifiable management system standard
    U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    Mandatory SEC disclosure regulation

    Testing

    ISO 22000
    Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits
    U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    No formal testing; disclosure controls evaluation

    Penalties

    ISO 22000
    Loss of certification, no legal penalties
    U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    SEC enforcement, fines, civil penalties

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 22000 and U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules

    ISO 22000 FAQ

    U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages