What is the primary objective of **ISO 26000**?

**ISO 26000 provides internationally recognized guidance on social responsibility to help organizations integrate sustainable practices into their operations.** Published in November 2010 and confirmed current in 2021, it defines social responsibility as accountability for impacts on society and the environment through transparent, ethical behavior aligned with stakeholder expectations and international norms. The standard outlines seven principles—**accountability, transparency, ethical behavior, respect for stakeholder interests, rule of law, international norms, and human rights**—and seven core subjects: organizational governance, human rights, labor practices, environment, fair operating practices, consumer issues, and community involvement.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 26000**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 26000, as it is voluntary guidance applicable to all types regardless of size, location, or sector.** It targets private, public, and non-profit entities, including SMEs, multinationals, hospitals, schools, and charities. Professionally, C-suite executives, compliance officers, and sustainability leaders adopt it to enhance governance, risk management, and stakeholder trust through contextual prioritization of core subjects via stakeholder engagement.

Does **ISO 26000** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 26000 explicitly does not require external audits or third-party certification.** Its Scope (Clause 1) states it is not a management system standard, and certification claims constitute misrepresentation since it contains no requirements. Organizations build credibility through self-assessment, transparent reporting of achievements and shortfalls, and alignment with tools like the ISO 26000 Communication Protocol.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 26000** be performed?

**ISO 26000 recommends periodic self-assessments at appropriate intervals determined by organizational context and risks.** Guidance emphasizes ongoing stakeholder engagement and reporting cycles to evaluate performance across core subjects, including objectives, progress, shortfalls, and improvement plans, integrated into management reviews without fixed frequencies.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 26000**?

**There are no direct legal consequences for non-compliance with ISO 26000, as it imposes no mandatory requirements.** Indirect risks include reputational damage, stakeholder distrust, weakened social license to operate, and misalignment with international norms, potentially exacerbating exposure to related regulations on human rights or environment.

An **ISO 26000** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 26000 aligns with frameworks like OECD Guidelines, UN Global Compact, GRI, and UN SDGs through official ISO linkage documents.** It complements them by providing principles and core subjects for SR integration, supporting consistent application without replacing certifiable standards.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 26000**?

**The first step is recognizing social responsibility and engaging stakeholders (Clause 5) to identify relevant core subjects.** Organizations map impacts, prioritize issues by significance, and establish governance for integration throughout strategy and operations.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 19600**?

**ISO 19600 provides guidelines for establishing, developing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving an effective Compliance Management System (CMS).** Published in 2014 as a Type B guidance standard, it follows a risk-based, PDCA structure across 10 clauses (context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement) grounded in principles of good governance, proportionality, transparency, and sustainability. Applicable to all organization sizes and sectors, it integrates with existing processes to transform compliance into a strategic asset, though it was withdrawn in 2021 and replaced by ISO 37301.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 19600**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 19600, as it is non-certifiable guidance rather than mandatory requirements.** It applies voluntarily to any entity—public, private, NGO, SME, or multinational—facing statutory, regulatory, contractual, or internal obligations. Stakeholders include CCOs, boards, and risk officers in sectors like finance, manufacturing, healthcare, and tech, who use it for benchmarking CMS effectiveness to regulators, customers, and partners.

Does **ISO 19600** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, ISO 19600 does not require external audits or third-party certification, being a Type B guidance standard without mandatory "shall" requirements.** Organizations conduct internal audits per Clause 9.2 (aligned with ISO 19011), self-assessments, and management reviews (Clause 9.3), documenting evidence of CMS suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness for internal benchmarking or stakeholder assurance.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 19600** be performed?

**ISO 19600 assessments should be performed at planned intervals, with continual monitoring, periodic internal audits, and reassessments triggered by changes in context, obligations, or risks.** Clause 9.1 requires ongoing monitoring of performance via Key Compliance Indicators (KCIs); Clause 9.2 specifies audits at planned intervals; management reviews (Clause 9.3) occur regularly (e.g., quarterly), incorporating audit results, nonconformities, and regulatory updates for PDCA-driven improvement.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 19600**?

**There are no direct consequences for non-compliance with ISO 19600 itself, as it imposes no legal penalties being voluntary guidance.** However, weak CMS alignment increases exposure to regulatory fines, operational disruptions, reputational damage, and higher insurance costs from unaddressed compliance obligations and risks, as evidenced by cases like XYZ Bank's €12M fine for inadequate controls.

An **ISO 19600** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 19600's Annex SL high-level structure enables seamless mapping to other management system frameworks.** Its 10 clauses align with ISO 9001 (quality), ISO 14001 (environment), and ISO 27001 (security) for integrated systems, reducing duplication via shared processes, risk registers, audits, and PDCA cycles while preserving compliance independence.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 19600**?

**The first step is securing leadership commitment and establishing a Compliance Steering Committee via board resolution (Phase 0, Clause 5).** Define CMS scope (Clause 4.3), appoint a CCO with direct governing body access, independence, and resources (Clause 4.4), ensuring tone at the top through a signed charter before contextual analysis and gap assessment.

ISO 26000 vs ISO 19600

Standards Comparison

ISO 26000

Voluntary

2010

International guidance standard for social responsibility integration

ISO 19600

Voluntary

2014

International guidelines for compliance management systems

Quick Verdict

ISO 26000 provides non-certifiable guidance on social responsibility principles and core subjects for all organizations, while ISO 19600 offers CMS guidelines for compliance obligations and risks. Companies adopt them for strategic governance, risk management, and stakeholder trust without certification burdens.

Social Responsibility

ISO 26000

ISO 26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Non-certifiable guidance explicitly rejecting certification
Seven foundational principles underpinning all actions
Seven interconnected core subjects for holistic SR
Stakeholder engagement to prioritize relevant issues
Multi-stakeholder consensus from 500+ global experts

Compliance Management

ISO 19600

ISO 19600:2014 Compliance management systems — Guidelines

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Risk-based CMS guidelines for all organizations
Principles of good governance and proportionality
Annex SL structure for management system integration
PDCA cycle for continual improvement
Scalable framework predecessor to ISO 37301

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

ISO 26000 Details

What It Is

ISO 26000:2010 is a non-certifiable international guidance standard providing a framework for social responsibility (SR). Applicable to all organizations regardless of size, sector, or location, it defines SR, outlines principles, and guides assessment of impacts through stakeholder engagement and holistic integration.

Key Components

Seven **core principlesaccountability, transparency, ethical behavior, respect for stakeholder interests, rule of law, international norms, human rights.
Seven **core subjectsorganizational governance, human rights, labor practices, environment, fair operating practices, consumer issues, community involvement.
No requirements or controls; emphasizes contextual prioritization and PDCA-style integration without certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Enhances sustainability commitment, risk management, and stakeholder trust. Aligns with SDGs, OECD, GRI; reduces reputational risks, improves resilience, unlocks market access and talent attraction without certification burdens.

Implementation Overview

Phased approach: materiality assessment, stakeholder engagement, policy integration into management systems (e.g., ISO 14001), training, reporting via Communication Protocol. Suited for all organizations; self-assessed with external assurance optional.

ISO 19600 Details

What It Is

ISO 19600:2014, titled Compliance management systems — Guidelines, is a Type B guidance standard from the International Organization for Standardization. Its primary purpose is providing recommendations for establishing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving a Compliance Management System (CMS). It adopts a risk-based approach with a high-level structure (Annex SL) and PDCA cycle, applicable to all organizations.

Key Components

Ten clauses: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
Core principles: good governance, proportionality, transparency, sustainability.
No mandatory requirements; focuses on risk assessment, obligations identification, controls, monitoring.
Non-certifiable benchmarking tool, predecessor to ISO 37301.

Why Organizations Use It

Mitigates regulatory penalties, operational risks, reputational damage.
Enhances decision-making, efficiency (10-20% cost savings), market access.
Builds integrity culture, stakeholder trust; integrates with ISO 9001/14001.
Strategic lever for ESG, future-proofing to certifiable standards.

Implementation Overview

Phased: leadership commitment, gap analysis, design, rollout, continuous improvement.
Scalable for SMEs to multinationals, all sectors/geographies.
No formal certification; internal audits, self-assessments per ISO 19011.

Key Differences

Aspect	ISO 26000	ISO 19600
Scope	Social responsibility core subjects, principles	Compliance management systems, obligations, risks
Industry	All organizations, all sectors globally	All organizations, compliance-focused globally
Nature	Non-certifiable guidance standard	Non-certifiable guidelines (superseded by 37301)
Testing	Self-assessment, stakeholder engagement, reporting	Internal audits, management reviews, monitoring
Penalties	No formal penalties, reputational risks	No formal penalties, compliance failure risks

Scope

ISO 26000

Social responsibility core subjects, principles

ISO 19600

Compliance management systems, obligations, risks

Industry

ISO 26000

All organizations, all sectors globally

ISO 19600

All organizations, compliance-focused globally

Nature

ISO 26000

Non-certifiable guidance standard

ISO 19600

Non-certifiable guidelines (superseded by 37301)

Testing

ISO 26000

Self-assessment, stakeholder engagement, reporting

ISO 19600

Internal audits, management reviews, monitoring

Penalties

ISO 26000

No formal penalties, reputational risks

ISO 19600

No formal penalties, compliance failure risks

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ISO 26000 and ISO 19600

ISO 26000 FAQ

ISO 19600 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 10 SOC 2 Audit Pitfalls and Fixes: Real Auditor Red Flags from Type 2 Fieldwork with Evidence Checklists

Discover 10 common SOC 2 Type 2 audit pitfalls like evidence gaps, scope creep, vendor oversights. Get Fail/Pass visuals, client stories, checklists for 95% fir

What is DORA and which Requirements does the Standard define?

Discover DORA requirements for info security, strict authority monitoring, and steps to achieve compliance. Build a resilient organization with our detailed gui

Top 10 Cost-Saving Hacks for CMMC Compliance: Budgeting Blueprints for Small DIB Suppliers

Slash CMMC costs 30-50% with top 10 hacks for small DIB suppliers. Enclave scoping, FedRAMP clouds, automation, POA&M tips & budgeting blueprints for Level 2 co

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

PCI DSS vs ISO 27001

PCI DSS vs ISO 27001: Compare PCI's 12 granular card data controls vs ISO's risk-based ISMS. Discover key differences, compliance paths & best fit for your security needs now.

ISO 50001 vs ISO 30301

ISO 50001 vs ISO 30301: Energy systems for efficiency gains vs records management for compliance. Uncover differences, HLS integration, PDCA benefits & strategies to optimize operations now.

UL Certification vs ISO 28000

Compare UL Certification vs ISO 28000: UL ensures product safety thru testing/marks/inspections; ISO 28000 builds resilient supply chain security. Choose right for compliance!

ISO 26000

ISO 19600

Quick Verdict

ISO 26000

Key Features

ISO 19600

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

ISO 26000 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 19600 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

ISO 26000 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 26000?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 26000?

Does ISO 26000 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 26000 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 26000?

An ISO 26000 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 26000?

ISO 19600 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 19600?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 19600?

Does ISO 19600 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 19600 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 19600?

An ISO 19600 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 19600?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 10 SOC 2 Audit Pitfalls and Fixes: Real Auditor Red Flags from Type 2 Fieldwork with Evidence Checklists

What is DORA and which Requirements does the Standard define?

Top 10 Cost-Saving Hacks for CMMC Compliance: Budgeting Blueprints for Small DIB Suppliers

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

PCI DSS vs ISO 27001

ISO 50001 vs ISO 30301

UL Certification vs ISO 28000