ISO 26000
International guidance standard for social responsibility
ISO 30301
International standard for management systems for records
Quick Verdict
ISO 26000 offers voluntary guidance on social responsibility for all organizations, while ISO 30301 provides certifiable requirements for records management systems. Companies adopt ISO 26000 for ethical alignment and ISO 30301 for governance assurance and compliance.
ISO 26000
ISO 26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility
Key Features
- Explicitly non-certifiable guidance on social responsibility
- Seven principles underpinning socially responsible behavior
- Seven interconnected core subjects for impact assessment
- Stakeholder engagement for contextual issue prioritization
- Multi-stakeholder consensus from 500+ global experts
ISO 30301
ISO 30301:2019 Management systems for records requirements
Key Features
- High-Level Structure for MSS integration
- Normative Annex A operational records controls
- Explicit records requirements from context analysis
- Flexible conformity pathways including certification
- Risk-based planning with measurable objectives
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 26000 Details
What It Is
ISO 26000:2010 is a non-certifiable international guidance standard providing a framework for social responsibility (SR). Applicable to all organizations regardless of size, sector, or location, it defines SR as responsibility for impacts on society and environment through transparent, ethical behavior aligned with stakeholder expectations, law, and international norms. Its holistic, principles-based approach emphasizes context-specific application over rigid requirements.
Key Components
- **Seven principlesAccountability, transparency, ethical behavior, respect for stakeholder interests, rule of law, international norms, human rights.
- **Seven core subjectsOrganizational governance, human rights, labor practices, environment, fair operating practices, consumer issues, community involvement.
- Built on multi-stakeholder consensus; no auditable requirements or certification model—uses self-assessment, reporting, and stakeholder validation.
Why Organizations Use It
Enhances sustainability commitment, risk management, and stakeholder trust without certification burdens. Drives operational resilience, ESG alignment (SDGs, GRI, OECD), competitive differentiation, and credibility in reporting. Mitigates legal/reputational risks amid rising due diligence norms.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: materiality assessment, stakeholder engagement, policy integration into management systems (e.g., ISO 14001), training, supplier due diligence, transparent reporting via ISO Communication Protocol. Suited for all organizations; 12-18 months typical for full embedding.
ISO 30301 Details
What It Is
ISO 30301:2019 is an international standard specifying requirements for a Management System for Records (MSR). It provides a certifiable framework to establish, implement, maintain, and improve records management, ensuring authoritative evidence of business activities. Applicable to any organization, it uses a risk-based, High-Level Structure (HLS) approach across Clauses 4–10.
Key Components
- **HLS clauses (4–10)Context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- **Clause 8 and Annex A (normative)Records lifecycle controls (creation, capture, access, retention, disposition).
- Built on ISO 15489 principles (authenticity, reliability, usability).
- Flexible conformity: self-declaration, external confirmation, or third-party certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enhances compliance, auditability, and transparency.
- Mitigates records risks (loss, alteration, noncompliance).
- Improves efficiency and integrates with ISO 9001/27001.
- Builds stakeholder trust via governance and performance measurement.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: gap analysis, policy design, operational controls, audits. Suited for all sizes/industries; certification optional via accredited bodies. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 26000 | ISO 30301 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Social responsibility principles and core subjects | Records management system requirements and controls |
| Industry | All organizations worldwide, any size | All organizations worldwide, any size |
| Nature | Non-certifiable voluntary guidance | Certifiable management system requirements |
| Testing | Self-assessment, stakeholder reporting | Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, reputational risks | No legal penalties, loss of certification |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 26000 and ISO 30301
ISO 26000 FAQ
ISO 30301 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 10 Reasons CMMC Level 3 Certification Unlocks Competitive Edge for Primes Handling Critical DoD Programs
Discover top 10 reasons CMMC Level 3 certification unlocks competitive edge for DoD primes. Reduced APT risks, procurement prefs, NIST 800-172 compliance via v2

Top 5 Audit Survival Secrets for Your First SOC 2 Type 2: What Auditors Really Check (and How to Pass)
Master your first SOC 2 Type 2 audit with proven strategies: 40-sample testing, vendor gaps, CPA walkthroughs. Get checklists, scripts & tips from SignWell to s

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance
Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
PIPL vs NIST 800-171
PIPL vs NIST 800-171: Compare China's GDPR-like privacy law with US CUI security standard. Key differences in compliance, data transfers & controls for multinationals. Master global strategy now!
ISA 95 vs GLBA
Explore ISA 95 vs GLBA: Contrast manufacturing integration hierarchy (Purdue levels, activity models) with financial privacy/security rules. Optimize IT/OT & compliance now!
EPA vs NIST 800-53
Discover EPA vs NIST 800-53: Compare CAA, CWA, RCRA environmental standards with NIST's security/privacy controls for enterprise compliance. Master risk mgmt now!