Standards Comparison

    ISO 26000

    Voluntary
    2010

    International guidance standard for social responsibility

    VS

    ISO 30301

    Voluntary
    2019

    International standard for management systems for records

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 26000 offers voluntary guidance on social responsibility for all organizations, while ISO 30301 provides certifiable requirements for records management systems. Companies adopt ISO 26000 for ethical alignment and ISO 30301 for governance assurance and compliance.

    Social Responsibility

    ISO 26000

    ISO 26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Explicitly non-certifiable guidance on social responsibility
    • Seven principles underpinning socially responsible behavior
    • Seven interconnected core subjects for impact assessment
    • Stakeholder engagement for contextual issue prioritization
    • Multi-stakeholder consensus from 500+ global experts
    Records Management

    ISO 30301

    ISO 30301:2019 Management systems for records requirements

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • High-Level Structure for MSS integration
    • Normative Annex A operational records controls
    • Explicit records requirements from context analysis
    • Flexible conformity pathways including certification
    • Risk-based planning with measurable objectives

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 26000 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 26000:2010 is a non-certifiable international guidance standard providing a framework for social responsibility (SR). Applicable to all organizations regardless of size, sector, or location, it defines SR as responsibility for impacts on society and environment through transparent, ethical behavior aligned with stakeholder expectations, law, and international norms. Its holistic, principles-based approach emphasizes context-specific application over rigid requirements.

    Key Components

    • **Seven principlesAccountability, transparency, ethical behavior, respect for stakeholder interests, rule of law, international norms, human rights.
    • **Seven core subjectsOrganizational governance, human rights, labor practices, environment, fair operating practices, consumer issues, community involvement.
    • Built on multi-stakeholder consensus; no auditable requirements or certification model—uses self-assessment, reporting, and stakeholder validation.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Enhances sustainability commitment, risk management, and stakeholder trust without certification burdens. Drives operational resilience, ESG alignment (SDGs, GRI, OECD), competitive differentiation, and credibility in reporting. Mitigates legal/reputational risks amid rising due diligence norms.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: materiality assessment, stakeholder engagement, policy integration into management systems (e.g., ISO 14001), training, supplier due diligence, transparent reporting via ISO Communication Protocol. Suited for all organizations; 12-18 months typical for full embedding.

    ISO 30301 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 30301:2019 is an international standard specifying requirements for a Management System for Records (MSR). It provides a certifiable framework to establish, implement, maintain, and improve records management, ensuring authoritative evidence of business activities. Applicable to any organization, it uses a risk-based, High-Level Structure (HLS) approach across Clauses 4–10.

    Key Components

    • **HLS clauses (4–10)Context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
    • **Clause 8 and Annex A (normative)Records lifecycle controls (creation, capture, access, retention, disposition).
    • Built on ISO 15489 principles (authenticity, reliability, usability).
    • Flexible conformity: self-declaration, external confirmation, or third-party certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Enhances compliance, auditability, and transparency.
    • Mitigates records risks (loss, alteration, noncompliance).
    • Improves efficiency and integrates with ISO 9001/27001.
    • Builds stakeholder trust via governance and performance measurement.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: gap analysis, policy design, operational controls, audits. Suited for all sizes/industries; certification optional via accredited bodies. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISO 26000
    Social responsibility principles and core subjects
    ISO 30301
    Records management system requirements and controls

    Industry

    ISO 26000
    All organizations worldwide, any size
    ISO 30301
    All organizations worldwide, any size

    Nature

    ISO 26000
    Non-certifiable voluntary guidance
    ISO 30301
    Certifiable management system requirements

    Testing

    ISO 26000
    Self-assessment, stakeholder reporting
    ISO 30301
    Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits

    Penalties

    ISO 26000
    No legal penalties, reputational risks
    ISO 30301
    No legal penalties, loss of certification

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 26000 and ISO 30301

    ISO 26000 FAQ

    ISO 30301 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages