ISO 26000
International guidance standard for social responsibility
ISO 56002
International standard for innovation management systems guidance
Quick Verdict
ISO 26000 provides non-certifiable guidance on social responsibility principles and core subjects for all organizations, while ISO 56002 offers IMS guidance via PDCA for innovation value creation. Companies adopt them for credible sustainability and systematic innovation governance.
ISO 26000
ISO 26000:2010 Guidance on social responsibility
Key Features
- Explicitly non-certifiable guidance standard
- Seven principles underpin all SR actions
- Seven core subjects holistically address impacts
- Stakeholder engagement drives prioritization
- Universal applicability across all organizations
ISO 56002
ISO 56002:2019 Innovation management system — Guidance
Key Features
- PDCA cycle across Clauses 4-10 for IMS
- Leadership commitment and future-focused principles
- Portfolio governance and risk management
- Operational processes from ideation to deployment
- Balanced KPIs and continual improvement loops
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 26000 Details
What It Is
ISO 26000:2010 is a voluntary international guidance standard on social responsibility (SR). It provides a conceptual framework and practical advice for organizations to address impacts on society and environment through transparent, ethical behavior. Its holistic, principles-based approach emphasizes context-specific application via stakeholder engagement, without certifiable requirements.
Key Components
- **Seven principlesaccountability, transparency, ethical behavior, stakeholder respect, rule of law, international norms, human rights.
- **Seven core subjectsorganizational governance, human rights, labor practices, environment, fair operating practices, consumer issues, community involvement.
- Built on multi-stakeholder consensus; integrates with management systems like ISO 14001/45001.
- Non-certifiable; uses self-assessment and reporting for credibility.
Why Organizations Use It
Enhances sustainability commitment, risk management, ESG alignment, and stakeholder trust. Drives operational resilience, talent retention, market access; supports SDGs/OECD/GRI without compliance burdens.
Implementation Overview
Phased: assess materiality, engage stakeholders, integrate into governance/operations, report transparently. Applies universally to all sizes/sectors; no audits, focuses on PDCA cycles and continuous improvement. (178 words)
ISO 56002 Details
What It Is
ISO 56002:2019 is an international guidance standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving an Innovation Management System (IMS). It provides a generic, non-prescriptive framework applicable to all organizations, focusing on transforming innovation into a strategic capability using the PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle across Clauses 4-10.
Key Components
- Seven core clauses: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- Eight principles: value realization, future-focused leadership, strategic direction, culture, insights exploitation, uncertainty management, adaptability, systems thinking.
- Built on ISO High-Level Structure for integration; no fixed controls, emphasizes tailored governance; conformity assessment optional, not certifiable like ISO 56001.
Why Organizations Use It
- Drives measurable innovation ROI, portfolio optimization, risk management.
- Builds leadership commitment, culture of learning; enhances competitiveness, stakeholder confidence.
- No legal mandate, but strategic for resilience, market agility, partnerships.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: diagnostics, design, pilot, scale, sustain (12-18 months typical).
- Involves maturity assessments (e.g., PII), policy development, tooling, audits.
- Suits all sizes/sectors; pragmatic for SMEs via staged adoption.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 26000 | ISO 56002 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Social responsibility core subjects, principles | Innovation management system, PDCA processes |
| Industry | All organizations, all sectors globally | All organizations, innovation-focused globally |
| Nature | Non-certifiable guidance standard | Guidance for IMS, non-certifiable |
| Testing | Self-assessment, stakeholder reporting | Internal audits, management reviews |
| Penalties | No penalties, reputational risks only | No penalties, internal performance risks |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 26000 and ISO 56002
ISO 26000 FAQ
ISO 56002 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Top 10 SOC 2 Mistakes Startups Make (and Fixes with Automation)
Avoid top 10 SOC 2 mistakes like scope creep & evidence gaps. See fail/pass visuals, client quotes, Vanta/Drata automation fixes for bootstrapped startups. Quic
Thailand PDPA Enforcement Trends 2025: Analyzing 1,048 Complaints, Breach Volumes, and Hidden Lessons for Proactive Compliance
Decode PDPC Thailand's 1,048 complaints & 610 breaches. Uncover consent/security violations, project 2025 enforcement. Risk heatmap, self-assessment & playbook
DORA Third-Party Risk Management: A Consultant’s Guide to Mapping Critical ICT Service Providers in 2026
Navigate DORA's complex third-party risk pillar. Step-by-step consultant guide to identify critical ICT providers, remediate Article 30 contracts, and build the
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
PCI DSS vs CSA
PCI DSS vs CSA: Compare payment security standards with safety frameworks. Learn key requirements, differences & best practices for compliance & risk management. Secure your ops now! (152 characters)
WEEE vs ISO 30301
Compare WEEE Directive & ISO 30301: e-waste rules vs records systems. Achieve EPR compliance, hit 65% targets, ensure audit-proof docs. Unlock strategies now!
PMBOK vs ISO 30301
Compare PMBOK vs ISO 30301: Project mgmt evolution (processes, domains, tailoring) meets records MSR governance (clauses 4-10). Boost compliance & efficiency—explore now!