ISO 27001
International standard for information security management systems
ISO/IEC 42001:2023
International standard for AI management systems.
Quick Verdict
ISO 27001 establishes comprehensive information security management systems protecting all assets, while ISO/IEC 42001:2023 specializes in AI governance across lifecycles. Organizations adopt both for global certification, regulatory alignment, and building stakeholder trust through risk-managed innovation.
ISO 27001
ISO/IEC 27001:2022
Key Features
- Risk-based Information Security Management System
- 93 Annex A controls in four themes
- PDCA continual improvement cycle
- Internationally recognized certification standard
- Technology- and industry-agnostic framework
ISO/IEC 42001:2023
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 AI Management Systems
Key Features
- PDCA cycle for AI lifecycle governance
- Mandatory AI Impact Assessments for high-risk systems
- 38 Annex A controls for AI-specific risks
- HLS integration with ISO 27001 and 9001
- Third-party AI supplier risk management
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 27001 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 is the international certification standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving an Information Security Management System (ISMS). It uses a risk-based approach to manage information assets' confidentiality, integrity, and availability across all industries and sizes.
Key Components
- **Clauses 4-10Mandatory requirements for context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, and improvement.
- **Annex A93 controls in four themes (Organizational:37, People:8, Physical:14, Technological:34).
- Built on PDCA cycle for continual improvement.
- Voluntary certification via accredited auditors.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates breach risks (avg. $4.45M cost).
- Meets regulatory/contractual needs (GDPR, NIS2).
- Enhances resilience, wins bids (20-30% more).
- Builds trust, reduces insurance premiums.
Implementation Overview
Phased: initiation, risk assessment, controls deployment, audits (6-18 months). Scalable for SMEs/enterprises; requires leadership, training, PDCA.
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 is the world's first international standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving an Artificial Intelligence Management System (AIMS). It provides a PDCA-based framework to manage AI risks and opportunities across the full lifecycle, applicable to any organization involved in AI development, provision, or use.
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10 covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, and improvement.
- Annex A with 38 AI-specific controls for data, transparency, integrity, and resiliency.
- Built on ISO High-Level Structure (HLS) for integration with standards like ISO 27001.
- Certification via accredited third-party audits, with 3-year validity and surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates AI risks like bias, drift, and ethics issues.
- Aligns with regulations (e.g., EU AI Act).
- Enhances trust, reputation, and competitive edge.
- Drives innovation while ensuring compliance and stakeholder confidence.
Implementation Overview
- Phased gap analysis, risk assessments (AIIAs), training, and monitoring.
- Suited for all sizes/sectors; 6-12 months typical with existing ISO systems.
- Requires leadership commitment, documented processes, and audits.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 27001 | ISO/IEC 42001:2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Information security management across all assets | AI management systems and lifecycle risks |
| Industry | All industries and organization sizes globally | All industries using or providing AI globally |
| Nature | Voluntary certification management standard | Voluntary certification management standard |
| Testing | Stage 1/2 audits, annual surveillance, recert every 3 years | Stage 1/2 audits, annual surveillance, recert every 3 years |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no direct legal penalties | Loss of certification, no direct legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 27001 and ISO/IEC 42001:2023
ISO 27001 FAQ
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Asset-Backed Issuers and SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Applicability, Disclosures, and Compliance Roadmap
How SEC cybersecurity rules apply to asset-backed issuers (ABS): Form 10-D disclosures, ABS-EE risk management, Inline XBRL tagging, exemptions. Roadmap for tru
NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions
Unpack NIST CSF 2.0's enhanced Core Functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover. Get SME playbooks, governance shifts & strategies for cyber
SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder with Real-World Analogies
Decode SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria (Security, Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity, Privacy) into plain English with tables, TL;DRs & analogies
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
K-PIPA vs ISO 37301
Explore K-PIPA vs ISO 37301: Korea's stringent privacy law meets global CMS standard. Align compliance, mitigate risks, master CPO mandates & audits for seamless ops. Compare now!
Basel III vs CIS Controls
Compare Basel III vs CIS Controls: Banking capital & liquidity rules meet cybersecurity hygiene. Boost compliance, resilience & risk strategy. Explore now!
ISO 31000 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
Discover ISO 31000 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Align global risk guidelines with mandatory disclosures. Key differences, synergies & strategies for resilient governance. Read now!