What is the primary objective of **ISO 27018**?

**ISO 27018 provides a code of practice for protecting **Personally Identifiable Information (PII)** in public clouds where the cloud service provider (CSP) acts as a PII processor.** It extends **ISO 27001** and **ISO 27002** with ~25–30 privacy-specific controls addressing multi-tenancy, subprocessor transparency, consent, purpose limitation, data minimization, breach notification, and restrictions on secondary PII use like advertising without consent. The 2025 edition aligns with **ISO 27002:2022**, emphasizing processor obligations across the PII lifecycle.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 27018**?

**ISO 27018 applies to public cloud service providers (CSPs) acting as PII processors, not controllers.** Targeted at hyperscalers, regional CSPs, and sector-specific platforms (e.g., healthcare, finance), it is a professional best practice for demonstrating processor duties under contracts. Controllers use it for vendor due diligence, but no universal legal mandate exists; adoption is driven by procurement, regulatory alignment (e.g., GDPR Article 28), and market differentiation.

Does **ISO 27018** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 27018 does not offer standalone certification; it is assessed via external audits as an extension of **ISO 27001** certification.** Accredited bodies (under **ISO/IEC 17021** and **ISO/IEC 27006**) evaluate ~25–30 additional controls during **ISO 27001** Stage 1/2 audits, including review of the **Statement of Applicability (SoA)**. Certificates reference both standards, valid for 3 years with annual surveillance audits.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 27018** be performed?

**ISO 27018 assessments occur through **ISO 27001** audits: initial certification, annual surveillance audits, and full recertification every 3 years.** Ongoing internal risk assessments and continual improvement plans ensure controls adapt to cloud changes, subprocessors, and incidents, with auditors verifying effectiveness via logs, policies, and evidence.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 27018**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 27018 risks loss of market trust, procurement delays, and regulatory exposure as a weak processor.** No direct fines apply (voluntary code), but misalignment with laws like GDPR can trigger penalties, contract breaches, cyber insurance denials, and customer churn; CSPs face competitive disadvantage without audited **SoA** transparency.

An **ISO 27018** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 27018 maps directly to **ISO 27001** Annex A (93 controls), **ISO 27002:2022**, **ISO 27017** (cloud security), and **ISO 27701** (PIMS).** Controls align with GDPR Article 28 processor obligations, supporting data subject rights, subprocessor management, and breach notification across jurisdictions.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 27018**?

**Conduct a gap analysis against existing **ISO 27001** ISMS, **ISO 27002** controls, and ISO 27018 privacy objectives.** Scope PII processing services, review **SoA**, identify deficiencies in transparency, subprocessors, and rights support, then develop a prioritized remediation plan with cross-functional stakeholders.

What is the primary objective of **GDPR**?

**The primary objective of GDPR is to protect the fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons, particularly their right to the protection of personal data, while ensuring the free movement of personal data within the EU.** Adopted on 14 April 2016 and directly applicable from 25 May 2018, it replaces the fragmented 1995 Data Protection Directive (95/46/EC), introducing uniform rules via its status as a Regulation to harmonize enforcement, enhance data subject rights like erasure (Art. 17) and portability, and establish accountability (Art. 5(2)) through measures such as Records of Processing Activities (Art. 30) and privacy-by-design (Art. 25).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **GDPR**?

**GDPR applies to any controller or processor established in the EU, or any non-EU entity offering goods/services to or monitoring the behavior of EU data subjects, regardless of location (Art. 3).** This extraterritorial scope captures data controllers determining processing purposes and processors handling data on their behalf, including non-EU firms requiring an EU representative (Art. 27) unless processing is occasional and low-risk. Personal data includes any information relating to an identifiable natural person, such as IP addresses or genetic data (Art. 4(1)).

Does **GDPR** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, GDPR does not mandate external audits or third-party certification for compliance.** It emphasizes the accountability principle (Art. 5(2)), requiring controllers to demonstrate compliance internally via Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) for high-risk processing (Art. 35), Records of Processing Activities (Art. 30), and appointment of a Data Protection Officer (DPO) where large-scale systematic monitoring or special category data is involved (Art. 37). Optional certifications (Arts. 42-43) and codes of conduct (Art. 40) provide safe harbors but are voluntary.

How often should an assessment for **GDPR** be performed?

**GDPR requires ongoing, risk-based assessments rather than fixed intervals, with Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) conducted prior to high-risk processing and reviewed if risks change (Art. 35(11)).** Controllers must continuously evaluate security measures proportionate to risks (Art. 32), maintain up-to-date Records of Processing Activities (Art. 30), and reassess lawful bases like legitimate interests via balancing tests whenever processing evolves, ensuring perpetual accountability (Art. 5(2)).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **GDPR**?

**Non-compliance with GDPR incurs administrative fines up to €20 million or 4% of total worldwide annual turnover, whichever is higher, for severe infringements (Art. 83(5-6)).** Tiered penalties apply: up to €10 million or 2% for lesser violations like record-keeping failures (Art. 83(4)). Supervisory authorities under the one-stop-shop model (Art. 56) issue fines, with the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) ensuring consistency; early cases include €50 million against Google (2019) and €1.2 billion against Meta (2023).

An **GDPR** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, GDPR principles such as purpose limitation, data minimization, and accountability have influenced and can be mapped to frameworks like Brazil’s LGPD, California’s CCPA/CPRA, Japan’s APPI, and South Korea’s PIPA.** Its extraterritorial reach and adequacy decisions (Art. 45) enable data flows to equivalent regimes (e.g., Japan, Argentina), while concepts like consent and breach notification align with OECD Privacy Guidelines, demonstrating the Brussels Effect in global privacy harmonization.

What is the first step to begin implementing **GDPR**?

**The first step to implement GDPR is to conduct a comprehensive data mapping exercise to identify all personal data processing activities, lawful bases, and associated risks (Art. 30).** This informs Records of Processing Activities, determines DPO appointment needs (Art. 37), and triggers DPIAs for high-risk operations (Art. 35), establishing the accountability foundation required under Art. 5(2) to demonstrate compliance.

ISO 27018 vs GDPR

Standards Comparison

ISO 27018

Voluntary

2019

Code of practice for PII protection in public cloud processors

GDPR

Mandatory

2016

EU regulation for personal data protection and privacy

Quick Verdict

ISO 27018 provides voluntary cloud PII controls for CSPs within ISO 27001, while GDPR is mandatory regulation for all EU personal data processors with strict fines. Companies adopt ISO 27018 for trust signals; GDPR for legal compliance.

Cloud Privacy

ISO 27018

ISO/IEC 27018:2025 Code of practice for PII protection in public clouds

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Mandates subprocessor transparency and location disclosure
Prohibits PII marketing use without explicit consent
Requires customer breach notification procedures
Supports data subject rights for controllers
Extends ISO 27001 with cloud PII controls

Data Privacy

GDPR

General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Extraterritorial scope targeting EU residents worldwide
Fines up to 4% global annual turnover
Accountability principle with demonstrable compliance
72-hour mandatory data breach notifications
One-stop-shop for cross-border enforcement

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

ISO 27018 Details

What It Is

ISO/IEC 27018:2025 is a code of practice extending ISO 27001 and ISO 27002 for protecting personally identifiable information (PII) in public clouds where providers act as PII processors. Its primary scope targets cloud-specific privacy risks like multi-tenancy and cross-border flows. It uses a risk-based approach, adding ~25-30 privacy controls to the ISMS framework.

Key Components

Core areas: transparency, consent, data minimization, breach notification, subprocessor management.
Built on ISO 27001 Annex A (93 controls) with PII-specific guidance.
Principles: consent/choice, purpose limitation, accuracy, security safeguards, accountability.
Certification via ISO 27001 audits; no standalone certificate.

Why Organizations Use It

Enhances customer trust, accelerates procurement, aligns with GDPR/HIPAA processor obligations. Reduces security questionnaire friction, aids cyber insurance, differentiates CSPs in regulated markets.

Implementation Overview

Integrate into existing ISMS via gap analysis, policy updates, technical controls (encryption, logging). Applies to CSPs of all sizes; requires annual audits. Timeline varies: low incremental effort if ISO 27001-certified.

GDPR Details

What It Is

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), officially Regulation (EU) 2016/679, is a directly applicable EU regulation harmonizing personal data protection across member states. It protects EU residents' privacy with extraterritorial scope, applying to any processing targeting them. GDPR employs a risk-based approach emphasizing accountability, privacy-by-design, and core principles like lawfulness and data minimization.

Key Components

Seven principles: lawfulness, purpose limitation, minimization, accuracy, storage limitation, integrity/confidentiality, accountability.
Data subject rights: access, rectification, erasure (right to be forgotten), portability, objection.
Obligations: DPIAs, DPO appointment, breach notifications, processing records.
Enforcement via supervisory authorities with fines up to €20 million or 4% global turnover; one-stop-shop for cross-border cases.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory compliance avoids severe penalties, mitigates risks from breaches, builds trust, and enables digital single market participation. It drives competitive advantages through robust governance and global benchmark status.

Implementation Overview

Involves gap analysis, policy/process redesign, training, technical safeguards. Applies to all sizes/industries processing EU data; no certification but ongoing DPA audits required. (178 words)

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ISO 27018 and GDPR

ISO 27018 FAQ

GDPR FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 10 SOC 2 Audit Pitfalls and Fixes: Real Auditor Red Flags from Type 2 Fieldwork with Evidence Checklists

Discover 10 common SOC 2 Type 2 audit pitfalls like evidence gaps, scope creep, vendor oversights. Get Fail/Pass visuals, client stories, checklists for 95% fir

Asset-Backed Issuers and SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Applicability, Disclosures, and Compliance Roadmap

How SEC cybersecurity rules apply to asset-backed issuers (ABS): Form 10-D disclosures, ABS-EE risk management, Inline XBRL tagging, exemptions. Roadmap for tru

SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder for Security, Availability, and Beyond

Decode AICPA Trust Services Criteria from auditor jargon to plain English with side-by-side tables, analogies & TL;DRs. CISOs & founders: implement SOC 2 contro

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

NIST CSF vs COBIT

Compare NIST CSF vs COBIT: Flexible cyber framework or robust IT governance? Key diffs, strengths & tips to align risk mgmt, boost maturity. Choose wisely now!

Six Sigma vs PMBOK

Explore Six Sigma vs PMBOK: DMAIC belts reduce defects while PMBOK's process groups & tailoring ensure project success. Compare, integrate & optimize now!

FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs ISO 26000

Compare FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs ISO 26000: Electronic records compliance meets social responsibility guidance. Unlock scope, controls, pitfalls & strategies for FDA-regulated firms. Dive in!

ISO 27018

GDPR

Quick Verdict

ISO 27018

Key Features

GDPR

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

ISO 27018 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

GDPR Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Frequently Asked Questions

ISO 27018 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 27018?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 27018?

Does ISO 27018 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 27018 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 27018?

An ISO 27018 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 27018?

GDPR FAQ

What is the primary objective of GDPR?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with GDPR?

Does GDPR require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for GDPR be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with GDPR?

An GDPR be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing GDPR?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 10 SOC 2 Audit Pitfalls and Fixes: Real Auditor Red Flags from Type 2 Fieldwork with Evidence Checklists

Asset-Backed Issuers and SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Applicability, Disclosures, and Compliance Roadmap

SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder for Security, Availability, and Beyond

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

NIST CSF vs COBIT

Six Sigma vs PMBOK

FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs ISO 26000