GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/ISO 27018 vs ISO 27701
    Standards Comparison

    ISO 27018 vs ISO 27701

    ISO 27018

    Voluntary
    2019

    Code of practice for PII protection in public clouds

    VS

    ISO 27701

    Voluntary
    2019

    International standard for privacy information management systems.

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 27018 provides cloud-specific PII controls for processors within ISO 27001, while ISO 27701 establishes a comprehensive PIMS for controllers and processors across environments. CSPs adopt 27018 for trust signals; organizations use 27701 for auditable privacy governance and regulatory alignment.

    Cloud Privacy

    ISO 27018

    ISO/IEC 27018:2026 Code of practice for cloud PII protection

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Tailored privacy controls for public cloud PII processors
    • Integrates additional controls into ISO 27001 ISMS audits
    • Mandates subprocessor transparency and location disclosure
    • Requires customer breach notification without undue delay
    • Prohibits PII secondary use without explicit consent
    Privacy Management

    ISO 27701

    ISO/IEC 27701:2026 Privacy Information Management

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Privacy Information Management System (PIMS) framework
    • Controller-specific controls in Annex A
    • Processor-specific controls in Annex B
    • GDPR and regulatory mappings provided
    • Integrates with ISO 27001 ISMS

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 27018 Details

    What It Is

    ISO/IEC 27018:2026 is an international code of practice extending ISO 27001 and ISO 27002 for protecting personally identifiable information (PII) in public clouds where providers act as PII processors. Its primary scope targets cloud-specific privacy risks like multi-tenancy and cross-border flows. It uses a risk-based approach, adding ~25-30 privacy controls to the ISMS framework.

    Key Components

    • Core areas: transparency, contractual obligations, data subject rights support, breach management, data minimization.
    • Built on ISO 27001 Annex A (93 controls) with privacy supplements.
    • Principles: consent, purpose limitation, accountability.
    • Compliance via ISO 27001 audits; no standalone certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Drives procurement acceleration, regulatory alignment (e.g., GDPR Article 28), risk reduction, customer trust, and cyber insurance benefits. Enhances competitive differentiation for CSPs.

    Implementation Overview

    Conduct gap analysis, integrate controls into ISMS, update SoA and contracts. Applies to CSPs of all sizes; involves audits, training, technical measures like encryption. Typical for cloud processors globally.

    ISO 27701 Details

    What It Is

    ISO/IEC 27701:2026 is an international standard providing requirements and guidance for a Privacy Information Management System (PIMS). It extends the ISO 27001 ISMS with privacy-specific controls, focusing on managing risks associated with personally identifiable information (PII) processing. It uses a risk-based, PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) management system approach for controllers and processors.

    Key Components

    • Clauses 4-10 mirroring ISO management systems, plus privacy extensions.
    • Annex A (controller controls) and Annex B (processor controls) with ~50 privacy-specific objectives.
    • Built on ISO 27001/27002; includes GDPR mappings (Annex D).
    • Optional certification via accredited bodies, 3-year cycle with surveillance audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Demonstrates accountability for GDPR/POPIA/LGPD compliance.
    • Mitigates privacy risks, enhances supply-chain trust.
    • Provides audit-ready evidence, competitive differentiation.
    • Builds stakeholder confidence through structured governance.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, risk assessment, control implementation, audits.
    • Applies to all PII-processing organizations; 6-12 months typical.
    • Involves RoPA, DSAR processes, training; integrates with ISMS.

    Key Differences

    AspectISO 27018ISO 27701
    ScopePII protection in public cloud processorsFull PIMS for controllers/processors all environments
    IndustryCloud service providers globallyAll PII-processing organizations worldwide
    NatureCode of practice, ISO 27001 extensionCertifiable PIMS management system
    TestingAssessed in ISO 27001 auditsIntegrated or standalone certification audits
    PenaltiesLoss of audit alignment, no legal penaltiesLoss of certification, no direct penalties

    Scope

    ISO 27018
    PII protection in public cloud processors
    ISO 27701
    Full PIMS for controllers/processors all environments

    Industry

    ISO 27018
    Cloud service providers globally
    ISO 27701
    All PII-processing organizations worldwide

    Nature

    ISO 27018
    Code of practice, ISO 27001 extension
    ISO 27701
    Certifiable PIMS management system

    Testing

    ISO 27018
    Assessed in ISO 27001 audits
    ISO 27701
    Integrated or standalone certification audits

    Penalties

    ISO 27018
    Loss of audit alignment, no legal penalties
    ISO 27701
    Loss of certification, no direct penalties

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 27018 and ISO 27701

    ISO 27018 FAQ

    ISO 27701 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide for Extending Your ISO 27001 ISMS to PIMS

    ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide for Extending Your ISO 27001 ISMS to PIMS

    Extend ISO 27001 ISMS to ISO 27701 PIMS with this step-by-step roadmap. Master role-specific controls, avoid pitfalls, meet certification evidence needs for pri

    What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...

    What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...

    Explore a world without mandatory GDPR: How would organizations manage data? What data privacy regs would emerge? Uncover impacts on businesses and privacy laws

    Why the SEC Stepped In: The Investor-Driven Push for Cybersecurity Transparency

    Why the SEC Stepped In: The Investor-Driven Push for Cybersecurity Transparency

    Discover why the SEC's 2023 cybersecurity rules treat cyber risks as material financial threats. Explore the 'stick and carrot' approach for standardized disclo

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how ISO 27018 and ISO 27701 compare against other standards

    Other ISO 27018 Comparisons

    • ISO 27018 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    • ISO 27018 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 27018
    • ISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs ISO 27018
    • IFS Food vs ISO 27018

    Other ISO 27701 Comparisons

    • ISO 27701 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    • MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 27701
    • ISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs ISO 27701
    • ENERGY STAR vs ISO 27701
    • TISAX vs ISO 27701
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved