What is the primary objective of **ISO 27018**?

**ISO 27018 provides a code of practice for protecting **Personally Identifiable Information (PII)** in public clouds where the cloud service provider (CSP) acts as a PII processor.** It extends **ISO 27001** and **ISO 27002** with ~25–30 privacy-specific controls addressing multi-tenancy, subprocessors, consent, purpose limitation, data minimization, breach notification, and restrictions on secondary PII use like advertising without consent. The 2025 edition aligns with **ISO 27002:2022**, emphasizing transparency, data subject rights support, and processor obligations across the PII lifecycle.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 27018**?

**ISO 27018 applies to public **CSPs** acting as **PII processors** for customers, including hyperscalers, regional providers, and sector-specific platforms processing PII.** It targets organizations handling customer PII in multi-tenant environments, such as infrastructure, platform, or software services. Controllers use it for vendor due diligence, but compliance is processor-centric; no legal mandate exists, though procurement, regulators, and insurers often require alignment for GDPR Article 28-like obligations.

Does **ISO 27018** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 27018 does not support standalone certification; controls are assessed via external audits as an extension of **ISO 27001** certification by accredited bodies under **ISO/IEC 17021** and **ISO/IEC 27006**.** Auditors review implementation in the **Statement of Applicability (SoA)** during Stage 1 (documents) and Stage 2 (effectiveness) audits, with certificates referencing both standards. CSPs like Microsoft undergo annual surveillance audits.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 27018** be performed?

**ISO 27018 assessments occur through **ISO 27001** certification cycles: annual surveillance audits and full recertification every three years.** Post-certification, continual improvement via internal audits, risk reassessments, and gap analyses addresses changes in cloud services, subprocessors, or regulations. The **SoA** is updated ongoingly to reflect control effectiveness.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 27018**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 27018 risks loss of market trust, procurement rejections, cyber insurance denials, and failure to meet processor obligations under laws like GDPR.** As a voluntary code, it imposes no direct fines, but misalignment exposes CSPs to contractual breaches, regulatory scrutiny, prolonged sales cycles, and liability from PII incidents due to inadequate transparency or breach notification.

Can **ISO 27018** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 27018 maps directly to frameworks like **ISO 27001 Annex A** (93 controls), **ISO 27017** (cloud security), and **ISO 27701** (PIMS for controllers/processors).** Its ~25–30 controls integrate into the **ISO 27001 ISMS** and **SoA**, aligning with GDPR Article 28 processor duties, OECD privacy guidelines, and **ISO 29100** principles like consent and accountability.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 27018**?

**Conduct a structured gap analysis against current **ISMS**, **ISO 27001/27002** controls, and ISO 27018 privacy requirements.** Engage stakeholders for discovery, review policies/contracts/technical configs, produce a prioritized remediation roadmap, and update the **SoA**—assuming **ISO 27001** baseline exists for layering cloud PII controls.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 27701**?

**ISO 27701 specifies requirements and guidance for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and continually improving a Privacy Information Management System (PIMS).** It operationalizes privacy governance for PII controllers and processors through Clauses 4–10 (context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement) and Annexes A (controller controls) and B (processor controls), integrating privacy risks into PDCA cycles with auditable evidence like RoPA and DSAR procedures.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 27701**?

**ISO 27701 applies to any organization acting as a PII controller, processor, or both, processing personally identifiable information.** It targets entities in any sector handling PII, especially those under GDPR, CCPA, LGPD, or POPIA, including SaaS providers, cloud services, finance, healthcare, and supply chains requiring demonstrable accountability via PIMS scope, roles, and controls.

Does **ISO 27701** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 27701 certification involves external audits by accredited third-party bodies via Stage 1 (documentation) and Stage 2 (implementation verification).** Certification is valid for three years with annual surveillance audits and recertification at year three; the 2025 edition enables standalone certification, often integrated with ISO 27001 audits, producing a certifiable PIMS with SoA and evidence artifacts.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 27701** be performed?

**ISO 27701 requires ongoing assessments through internal audits, management reviews, and continual improvement under Clause 9 and 10.** Certification maintenance demands annual surveillance audits, with full recertification every three years; privacy risk assessments, RoPA updates, and performance evaluations occur periodically per PDCA, tied to changes in processing activities or incidents.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 27701**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 27701 risks certification denial, surveillance failures, or withdrawal, plus exposure to underlying privacy law penalties like GDPR fines up to €20 million or 4% of global turnover.** Operationally, it leads to audit nonconformities, procurement disqualification, regulatory scrutiny, and unproven accountability in DSARs, incidents, or vendor disputes.

Can **ISO 27701** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 27701 includes annex mappings to frameworks including GDPR (Annex D), ISO/IEC 29100 (Annex C), and ISO/IEC 27018/29151 (Annex E).** Annex F details relationships to ISO 27001/27002, enabling integrated control sets, risk processes, and audits for unified compliance evidence.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 27701**?

**The first step is defining PIMS context and scope under Clause 4, identifying PII processing activities, controller/processor roles, and interested parties.** Conduct gap analysis using Annex F, produce initial RoPA and risk assessment, and secure leadership commitment for policy and objectives.

ISO 27018 vs ISO 27701

Standards Comparison

ISO 27018

Voluntary

2019

Code of practice for PII protection in public clouds

ISO 27701

Voluntary

2019

International standard for privacy information management systems.

Quick Verdict

ISO 27018 provides cloud-specific PII controls for processors within ISO 27001, while ISO 27701 establishes a comprehensive PIMS for controllers and processors across environments. CSPs adopt 27018 for trust signals; organizations use 27701 for auditable privacy governance and regulatory alignment.

Cloud Privacy

ISO 27018

ISO/IEC 27018:2025 Code of practice for cloud PII protection

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Tailored privacy controls for public cloud PII processors
Integrates additional controls into ISO 27001 ISMS audits
Mandates subprocessor transparency and location disclosure
Requires customer breach notification without undue delay
Prohibits PII secondary use without explicit consent

Privacy Management

ISO 27701

ISO/IEC 27701:2025 Privacy Information Management

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Privacy Information Management System (PIMS) framework
Controller-specific controls in Annex A
Processor-specific controls in Annex B
GDPR and regulatory mappings provided
Integrates with ISO 27001 ISMS

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

ISO 27018 Details

What It Is

ISO/IEC 27018:2025 is an international code of practice extending ISO 27001 and ISO 27002 for protecting personally identifiable information (PII) in public clouds where providers act as PII processors. Its primary scope targets cloud-specific privacy risks like multi-tenancy and cross-border flows. It uses a risk-based approach, adding ~25-30 privacy controls to the ISMS framework.

Key Components

Core areas: transparency, contractual obligations, data subject rights support, breach management, data minimization.
Built on ISO 27001 Annex A (93 controls) with privacy supplements.
Principles: consent, purpose limitation, accountability.
Compliance via ISO 27001 audits; no standalone certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives procurement acceleration, regulatory alignment (e.g., GDPR Article 28), risk reduction, customer trust, and cyber insurance benefits. Enhances competitive differentiation for CSPs.

Implementation Overview

Conduct gap analysis, integrate controls into ISMS, update SoA and contracts. Applies to CSPs of all sizes; involves audits, training, technical measures like encryption. Typical for cloud processors globally.

ISO 27701 Details

What It Is

ISO/IEC 27701:2025 is an international standard providing requirements and guidance for a Privacy Information Management System (PIMS). It extends the ISO 27001 ISMS with privacy-specific controls, focusing on managing risks associated with personally identifiable information (PII) processing. It uses a risk-based, PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) management system approach for controllers and processors.

Key Components

Clauses 4-10 mirroring ISO management systems, plus privacy extensions.
Annex A (controller controls) and Annex B (processor controls) with ~50 privacy-specific objectives.
Built on ISO 27001/27002; includes GDPR mappings (Annex D).
Optional certification via accredited bodies, 3-year cycle with surveillance audits.

Why Organizations Use It

Demonstrates accountability for GDPR/POPIA/LGPD compliance.
Mitigates privacy risks, enhances supply-chain trust.
Provides audit-ready evidence, competitive differentiation.
Builds stakeholder confidence through structured governance.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, risk assessment, control implementation, audits.
Applies to all PII-processing organizations; 6-12 months typical.
Involves RoPA, DSAR processes, training; integrates with ISMS.

Key Differences

Aspect	ISO 27018	ISO 27701
Scope	PII protection in public cloud processors	Full PIMS for controllers/processors all environments
Industry	Cloud service providers globally	All PII-processing organizations worldwide
Nature	Code of practice, ISO 27001 extension	Certifiable PIMS management system
Testing	Assessed in ISO 27001 audits	Integrated or standalone certification audits
Penalties	Loss of audit alignment, no legal penalties	Loss of certification, no direct penalties

Scope

ISO 27018

PII protection in public cloud processors

ISO 27701

Full PIMS for controllers/processors all environments

Industry

ISO 27018

Cloud service providers globally

ISO 27701

All PII-processing organizations worldwide

Nature

ISO 27018

Code of practice, ISO 27001 extension

ISO 27701

Certifiable PIMS management system

Testing

ISO 27018

Assessed in ISO 27001 audits

ISO 27701

Integrated or standalone certification audits

Penalties

ISO 27018

Loss of audit alignment, no legal penalties

ISO 27701

Loss of certification, no direct penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ISO 27018 and ISO 27701

ISO 27018 FAQ

ISO 27701 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 5 Reasons HITRUST CSF's MyCSF Platform Crushes Evidence Overload for R2 Assessments in Hybrid Cloud Environments

Explore top 5 advantages of HITRUST MyCSF for 1,400+ R2 controls in hybrid clouds. Slash docs by 30%, dodge under-scoping, achieve continuous compliance for hea

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows

Explore intuitive compliance software that automates workflows, simplifies onboarding, and reduces stress. Cut non-compliance costs 3x and boost efficiency for

The CIS Controls v8.1 Evidence Pack: What Auditors Ask For (and How to Produce Proof Fast)

Fail CIS Controls v8.1 audits due to missing evidence? Get the blueprint: exact artifacts auditors want, repository structure, and automation from security tool

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

GLBA vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

GLBA vs MLPS 2.0: US financial privacy & safeguards rules meet China's graded cyber protection. Unlock key diffs, compliance strategies for global ops now!

NIST CSF vs FSSC 22000

Discover NIST CSF vs FSSC 22000: Cybersecurity risk mgmt meets food safety cert. Key diffs, overlaps, impl tips—choose optimal framework for resilient ops today!

C-TPAT vs ISO 41001

Explore C-TPAT vs ISO 41001: CBP supply chain security powerhouse vs global FM standard. Uncover differences, benefits & strategies for compliance, resilience. Optimize now!

ISO 27018

ISO 27701

Quick Verdict

ISO 27018

Key Features

ISO 27701

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

ISO 27018 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 27701 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

ISO 27018 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 27018?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 27018?

Does ISO 27018 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 27018 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 27018?

Can ISO 27018 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 27018?

ISO 27701 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 27701?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 27701?

Does ISO 27701 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 27701 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 27701?

Can ISO 27701 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 27701?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 5 Reasons HITRUST CSF's MyCSF Platform Crushes Evidence Overload for R2 Assessments in Hybrid Cloud Environments

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows

The CIS Controls v8.1 Evidence Pack: What Auditors Ask For (and How to Produce Proof Fast)

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

GLBA vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

NIST CSF vs FSSC 22000

C-TPAT vs ISO 41001