Standards Comparison

    ISO 27032

    Voluntary
    2012

    Guidelines for Internet cybersecurity and stakeholder collaboration

    VS

    APRA CPS 234

    Mandatory
    2019

    Australian prudential standard for information security resilience

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 27032 offers voluntary global guidelines for Internet security collaboration, while APRA CPS 234 mandates enforceable information security capabilities for Australian financial entities. Organizations adopt ISO 27032 for best practices worldwide; CPS 234 ensures regulatory compliance and resilience.

    Cybersecurity

    ISO 27032

    ISO/IEC 27032:2023 Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Multi-stakeholder collaboration for cyberspace security
    • Guidelines integrating information, network, Internet security
    • Risk assessment and threat modeling for Internet threats
    • Mapping to ISO 27002 controls in Annex A
    • Emphasis on detection, response, and information sharing
    Information Security

    APRA CPS 234

    APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Board ultimate responsibility for information security
    • 72-hour APRA notification for material incidents
    • Systematic risk-based testing of security controls
    • Coverage of third-party managed information assets
    • Annual incident response plan testing and assurance

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 27032 Details

    What It Is

    ISO/IEC 27032:2023Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security – is an international guidance standard providing non-certifiable recommendations for managing Internet security risks. It focuses on cyberspace as a multi-layered ecosystem, emphasizing collaborative, risk-based approaches to connect information security, network security, Internet security, and critical infrastructure protection.

    Key Components

    • Thematic domains like risk assessment, incident management, stakeholder roles, technical controls.
    • Annex A mapping Internet threats to ISO/IEC 27002 controls.
    • Built on multi-stakeholder collaboration and PDCA cycle.
    • No fixed controls; integrates with ISO 27001 ISMS via Statement of Applicability.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Reduces ecosystem risks, improves resilience, shortens incident response.
    • Enhances trust, competitive edge, regulatory alignment (e.g., NIS2).
    • Strategic benefits: efficiency, market access, insurance savings.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, risk assessment, controls deployment, monitoring.
    • Applies to all sizes with online presence; uses existing frameworks.
    • No certification; self-assessed via audits and continuous improvement. (178 words)

    APRA CPS 234 Details

    What It Is

    APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a mandatory regulation for Australian financial institutions regulated by APRA, including banks, insurers, and superannuation funds. Effective from 1 July 2019, it requires entities to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats and vulnerabilities, minimizing impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of information assets, including those managed by third parties. It adopts a risk-based, assurance-driven approach focused on governance and resilience.

    Key Components

    • Board ultimate responsibility and defined roles/responsibilities
    • Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity
    • Commensurate controls across full asset lifecycle
    • Systematic testing program and internal audit assurance
    • Incident response plans with annual testing
    • Strict APRA notifications: 72 hours for material incidents, 10 business days for unremediable weaknesses Principle-based, no fixed control count; aligns with ISO 27001/NIST.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Legally required to avoid enforcement, penalties, and supervisory actions. Drives cyber resilience, third-party risk management, stakeholder protection, and operational continuity. Enhances trust, reduces incident impacts, and supports prudential stability.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis, governance/policies, asset inventory, controls/testing, third-party assessments. Applies to all sizes of APRA entities; no formal certification but requires evidence for audits. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISO 27032
    Internet security guidelines in cyberspace ecosystem
    APRA CPS 234
    Information security capability for financial entities

    Industry

    ISO 27032
    All organizations with online presence globally
    APRA CPS 234
    Australian financial services (banks, insurers, super)

    Nature

    ISO 27032
    Voluntary international guidance, non-certifiable
    APRA CPS 234
    Mandatory prudential standard, enforceable by regulator

    Testing

    ISO 27032
    Risk-based gap analysis, continuous improvement recommended
    APRA CPS 234
    Systematic independent testing, annual reviews required

    Penalties

    ISO 27032
    No legal penalties, reputational risk only
    APRA CPS 234
    Regulatory sanctions, fines, heightened supervision

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 27032 and APRA CPS 234

    ISO 27032 FAQ

    APRA CPS 234 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages