ISO 27032
Guidelines for Internet cybersecurity and stakeholder collaboration
APRA CPS 234
Australian prudential standard for information security resilience
Quick Verdict
ISO 27032 offers voluntary global guidelines for Internet security collaboration, while APRA CPS 234 mandates enforceable information security capabilities for Australian financial entities. Organizations adopt ISO 27032 for best practices worldwide; CPS 234 ensures regulatory compliance and resilience.
ISO 27032
ISO/IEC 27032:2023 Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security
Key Features
- Multi-stakeholder collaboration for cyberspace security
- Guidelines integrating information, network, Internet security
- Risk assessment and threat modeling for Internet threats
- Mapping to ISO 27002 controls in Annex A
- Emphasis on detection, response, and information sharing
APRA CPS 234
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security
Key Features
- Board ultimate responsibility for information security
- 72-hour APRA notification for material incidents
- Systematic risk-based testing of security controls
- Coverage of third-party managed information assets
- Annual incident response plan testing and assurance
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 27032 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27032:2023 – Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security – is an international guidance standard providing non-certifiable recommendations for managing Internet security risks. It focuses on cyberspace as a multi-layered ecosystem, emphasizing collaborative, risk-based approaches to connect information security, network security, Internet security, and critical infrastructure protection.
Key Components
- Thematic domains like risk assessment, incident management, stakeholder roles, technical controls.
- Annex A mapping Internet threats to ISO/IEC 27002 controls.
- Built on multi-stakeholder collaboration and PDCA cycle.
- No fixed controls; integrates with ISO 27001 ISMS via Statement of Applicability.
Why Organizations Use It
- Reduces ecosystem risks, improves resilience, shortens incident response.
- Enhances trust, competitive edge, regulatory alignment (e.g., NIS2).
- Strategic benefits: efficiency, market access, insurance savings.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, risk assessment, controls deployment, monitoring.
- Applies to all sizes with online presence; uses existing frameworks.
- No certification; self-assessed via audits and continuous improvement. (178 words)
APRA CPS 234 Details
What It Is
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a mandatory regulation for Australian financial institutions regulated by APRA, including banks, insurers, and superannuation funds. Effective from 1 July 2019, it requires entities to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats and vulnerabilities, minimizing impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of information assets, including those managed by third parties. It adopts a risk-based, assurance-driven approach focused on governance and resilience.
Key Components
- Board ultimate responsibility and defined roles/responsibilities
- Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity
- Commensurate controls across full asset lifecycle
- Systematic testing program and internal audit assurance
- Incident response plans with annual testing
- Strict APRA notifications: 72 hours for material incidents, 10 business days for unremediable weaknesses Principle-based, no fixed control count; aligns with ISO 27001/NIST.
Why Organizations Use It
Legally required to avoid enforcement, penalties, and supervisory actions. Drives cyber resilience, third-party risk management, stakeholder protection, and operational continuity. Enhances trust, reduces incident impacts, and supports prudential stability.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, governance/policies, asset inventory, controls/testing, third-party assessments. Applies to all sizes of APRA entities; no formal certification but requires evidence for audits. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 27032 | APRA CPS 234 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Internet security guidelines in cyberspace ecosystem | Information security capability for financial entities |
| Industry | All organizations with online presence globally | Australian financial services (banks, insurers, super) |
| Nature | Voluntary international guidance, non-certifiable | Mandatory prudential standard, enforceable by regulator |
| Testing | Risk-based gap analysis, continuous improvement recommended | Systematic independent testing, annual reviews required |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, reputational risk only | Regulatory sanctions, fines, heightened supervision |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 27032 and APRA CPS 234
ISO 27032 FAQ
APRA CPS 234 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance
Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac

Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2
Use CIS Controls v8.1 as your compliance on-ramp. Map one security program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2 without duplicating work via practical mapp

ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide for Extending Your ISO 27001 ISMS to PIMS
Extend ISO 27001 ISMS to ISO 27701 PIMS with this step-by-step roadmap. Master role-specific controls, avoid pitfalls, meet certification evidence needs for pri
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 37301 vs EMAS
ISO 37301 vs EMAS: Certifiable CMS (ISO 37301) tackles compliance risks with leadership & audits; EMAS excels in verified environmental performance. Integrate for IMS success—discover your best fit!
APPI vs HITRUST CSF
Compare APPI vs HITRUST CSF: Japan's privacy law vs certifiable security framework. Uncover key differences, compliance tips & implementation for global data handlers. Secure your edge now.
PIPEDA vs APRA CPS 234
Unlock PIPEDA vs APRA CPS 234: Compare Canada's privacy principles with Australia's financial security standard. Key differences, compliance strategies & global tips. Ensure resilience now!