ISO 27032
International guidelines for Internet cybersecurity and collaboration
Basel III
Global framework for bank capital, leverage, and liquidity standards
Quick Verdict
ISO 27032 offers voluntary cybersecurity guidelines for Internet security across organizations, emphasizing collaboration. Basel III mandates binding capital and liquidity rules for banks to ensure financial stability. Companies adopt ISO 27032 for resilience; banks follow Basel III to avoid regulatory penalties.
ISO 27032
ISO/IEC 27032:2023 Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security
Key Features
- Emphasizes multi-stakeholder collaboration in cyberspace
- Provides guidelines for Internet security risks
- Maps threats to ISO/IEC 27002 controls
- Focuses on ecosystem risk assessment techniques
- Promotes detection and coordinated incident response
Basel III
Basel III: Finalising post-crisis reforms
Key Features
- Strengthened CET1 capital requirements and buffers
- Non-risk-based leverage ratio minimum 3%
- Liquidity Coverage Ratio for 30-day stress
- Net Stable Funding Ratio for structural resilience
- Output floor constraining internal model RWAs
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 27032 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27032:2023, titled Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security, is an international guidance standard. It frames cybersecurity as an ecosystem activity, connecting information security, network security, Internet security, and critical infrastructure protection. Its risk-based approach emphasizes collaboration to manage cyberspace risks and incidents.
Key Components
- Multi-stakeholder roles and responsibilities
- Risk assessment, threat modeling, and controls mapped to ISO/IEC 27002
- Domains: access control, incident management, vulnerability management, supplier resilience
- Built on PDCA cycle; non-certifiable, complements ISO/IEC 27001
Why Organizations Use It
- Reduces legal exposure (e.g., NIS2, GDPR) and operational disruptions
- Enhances resilience, efficiency, and trust with stakeholders
- Provides competitive edge in regulated markets and supply chains
- Lowers breach costs via faster detection and response
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: scoping, gap analysis, controls deployment, monitoring. Applies to all sizes, especially online/networked operations. No certification; integrate via audits and exercises. (178 words)
Basel III Details
What It Is
Basel III is the global regulatory framework issued by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) post-2007-2009 financial crisis. It establishes prudential standards to strengthen bank resilience by improving capital quality and quantity, constraining leverage, and mandating liquidity buffers. The approach integrates risk-weighted assets (RWA) with non-risk-based metrics for comprehensive solvency.
Key Components
- **Three PillarsPillar 1 (capital ratios, leverage ratio, LCR/NSFR), Pillar 2 (supervisory review/ICAAP), Pillar 3 (disclosures).
- Minimums: CET1 4.5%, Tier 1 6%, Total capital 8%; leverage 3%; buffers (conservation 2.5%, countercyclical, G-SIB).
- Output floor caps internal model benefits at 72.5% of standardized RWA.
- Compliance through national implementation, no global certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Banks implement for mandatory regulatory compliance, enhancing resilience against shocks, reducing systemic risk, and improving RWA comparability. Benefits include better funding costs, investor confidence, and strategic balance-sheet optimization amid jurisdictional variations.
Implementation Overview
Multi-phased enterprise transformation: gap analysis, data/system upgrades, governance setup, stress testing. Targets internationally active banks globally; involves Pillar 3 reporting and supervisory audits.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 27032 | Basel III |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Internet security, cyberspace collaboration | Bank capital, liquidity, leverage ratios |
| Industry | All organizations with online presence | Internationally active banks primarily |
| Nature | Voluntary guidelines, non-certifiable | Mandatory prudential standards, jurisdictionally enforced |
| Testing | Gap analysis, tabletop exercises | Stress tests, ICAAP, supervisory reviews |
| Penalties | No direct penalties, reputational risk | Fines, asset caps, business restrictions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 27032 and Basel III
ISO 27032 FAQ
Basel III FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Regulatory Radar: How Data-Driven Compliance Tools Provide Strategic Foresight
Unlock strategic foresight with data-driven compliance tools. Act as your regulatory radar: real-time monitoring, automated insights, and 3x cost cuts. Anticipa

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows
Explore intuitive compliance software that automates workflows, simplifies onboarding, and reduces stress. Cut non-compliance costs 3x and boost efficiency for

ISO 27701 2025 Update: Navigating Standalone Certification Myths, Audit Realities, and a 90-Day PIMS Launch Plan
Debunk ISO 27701 2025 standalone certification myths vs ISO 27001. Get a 90-day PIMS launch roadmap, checklists & audit prep to certify faster amid global priva
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 27001 vs IFS Food
ISO 27001 vs IFS Food: Compare info security mgmt (ISMS) for all industries vs food safety/quality audits. Key diffs in scope, risks & controls. Boost compliance now!
ITIL vs CCPA
Discover ITIL vs CCPA: Align ITSM best practices with CA privacy law for secure data handling, consumer rights, and compliance. Unlock strategies to integrate SVS with rights like opt-out. Achieve resilience now!
AEO vs ISO 13485
Discover AEO vs ISO 13485: Customs security (AEO) vs medical device QMS. Key differences, compliance benefits & implementation strategies for global trade success. Compare now!