Standards Comparison

    ISO 27032

    Voluntary
    2012

    Guidelines for cybersecurity in Internet and cyberspace ecosystems

    VS

    COBIT

    Voluntary
    2019

    Global framework for enterprise IT governance and management

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 27032 provides Internet security guidelines for cyberspace collaboration, while COBIT offers enterprise IT governance framework. Companies adopt ISO 27032 for multi-stakeholder cyber resilience and COBIT to align IT with business goals and manage risks effectively.

    Cybersecurity

    ISO 27032

    ISO/IEC 27032:2023 Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Multi-stakeholder collaboration across cyberspace ecosystem
    • Guidelines for Internet security threats and controls
    • Annex A mapping to ISO 27002 controls
    • Risk assessment for interconnected digital environments
    • Emphasis on incident management and information sharing
    IT Governance

    COBIT

    COBIT 2019: Control Objectives for Information Technologies

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • 40 objectives in five domains (EDM, APO, BAI, DSS, MEA)
    • 11 design factors enable tailored governance systems
    • CMMI-based capability levels 0-5 for performance management
    • Goals cascade aligns stakeholder needs to IT metrics
    • Explicit separation of governance from management roles

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 27032 Details

    What It Is

    ISO/IEC 27032:2023, titled Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security, is an international guidance standard (not certifiable) developed by ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 27. Its primary purpose is to provide actionable guidelines for improving Internet security within the broader cyberspace ecosystem, connecting information security, network security, and critical infrastructure protection. It employs a risk-based, collaborative approach emphasizing multi-stakeholder roles.

    Key Components

    • Thematic domains like risk assessment, incident management, stakeholder collaboration, technical controls (e.g., secure coding, monitoring), and awareness training.
    • Annex A maps Internet threats to ISO/IEC 27002 controls.
    • Built on PDCA cycle for continuous improvement.
    • No fixed controls; integrates with ISO 27001 ISMS via Statement of Applicability.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Enhances resilience against Internet threats (phishing, DDoS), reduces breach costs, aligns with regulations (NIS2, GDPR). Builds stakeholder trust, enables market access, streamlines audits, and provides competitive differentiation through ecosystem collaboration.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: scoping, gap analysis, risk treatment, control deployment, monitoring. Applies to all sizes, especially online/ networked orgs (enterprises, cloud providers). No certification; self-assess and integrate into existing frameworks like ISO 27001.

    COBIT Details

    What It Is

    COBIT 2019, officially Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies, is a comprehensive IT governance and management framework from ISACA. It enables organizations to create value from IT, manage risks, and optimize resources through tailored enterprise governance of IT (EGIT). Its design-factor-driven methodology emphasizes outcomes, using a goals cascade to align stakeholder needs with objectives.

    Key Components

    • **Five domainsEDM (governance), APO (strategy), BAI (delivery), DSS (operations), MEA (assurance)
    • 40 governance and management objectives
    • Six principles and seven components (processes, structures, culture, etc.)
    • CMMI-based performance management (capability levels 0-5); ISACA training/certificates, no organization certification

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Aligns IT with business strategy for value realization
    • Maps to regulations (SOX, GDPR) for compliance
    • Optimizes risks via structured assurance
    • Enhances digital transformation and stakeholder trust

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: current assessment, design (11 factors), pilots, operate, improve
    • Suits all sizes/industries; requires training, change management
    • Voluntary capability assessments/audits (approx. 178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISO 27032
    Internet security guidelines in cyberspace
    COBIT
    Enterprise IT governance and management

    Industry

    ISO 27032
    Organizations with online presence, global
    COBIT
    All industries, enterprise-wide focus

    Nature

    ISO 27032
    Non-certifiable guidance standard
    COBIT
    Governance framework, non-certifiable

    Testing

    ISO 27032
    Gap analysis, self-assessments
    COBIT
    Capability maturity assessments (0-5 levels)

    Penalties

    ISO 27032
    No direct penalties, increased breach risk
    COBIT
    No direct penalties, governance weaknesses

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 27032 and COBIT

    ISO 27032 FAQ

    COBIT FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages