ISO 27032
International guidelines for Internet cybersecurity and collaboration
ISO 31000
International guidelines for enterprise risk management
Quick Verdict
ISO 27032 provides cybersecurity guidelines for Internet security and stakeholder collaboration, while ISO 31000 offers general risk management principles for any uncertainty. Companies adopt 27032 for cyberspace resilience and 31000 for enterprise-wide decision-making.
ISO 27032
ISO/IEC 27032:2023 Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security
Key Features
- Multi-stakeholder collaboration across cyberspace ecosystem
- Guidelines for Internet security threats and controls
- Annex A mapping to ISO/IEC 27002 controls
- Risk assessment for cyberspace-specific threats
- Emphasis on incident response and information sharing
ISO 31000
ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines
Key Features
- Eight principles guiding effective risk management
- Framework emphasizing leadership and integration
- Iterative process for risk assessment and treatment
- Non-certifiable, flexible for any organization
- Focus on human, cultural factors and improvement
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 27032 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27032:2023, titled Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security, is an international guidance standard. It provides non-certifiable recommendations for managing Internet security risks in interconnected ecosystems. The primary scope covers cyberspace threats, emphasizing multi-stakeholder collaboration. It uses a risk-based approach integrated with PDCA cycles.
Key Components
- Core areas: risk assessment, incident management, stakeholder roles, technical/organizational controls.
- Annex A maps threats to ISO/IEC 27002 controls.
- Built on principles of collaboration, trust, and continuous improvement.
- No fixed controls; complements ISO/IEC 27001 ISMS without certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Reduces ecosystem risks like DDoS and supply-chain attacks; enhances resilience and detection. Supports regulatory alignment (e.g., NIS2). Builds stakeholder trust, improves efficiency, and provides competitive differentiation in digital markets.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: gap analysis, risk assessment, control deployment, monitoring. Applies to all sizes, especially online/ networked operations. Involves training, audits; integrates with existing ISMS. No formal certification required.
ISO 31000 Details
What It Is
ISO 31000:2018, Risk management — Guidelines is an international standard providing non-certifiable guidelines for systematic risk management. Its primary purpose is to help organizations of any size or sector manage uncertainty affecting objectives, using a principles-based, iterative approach focused on creating and protecting value.
Key Components
- **Three pillars8 principles (e.g., integrated, customized, dynamic), framework (leadership, integration, design, evaluation), and process (communication, assessment, treatment, monitoring).
- No fixed controls; flexible, adaptable to context.
- Built on PDCA cycle; emphasizes leadership accountability.
- Non-certifiable; compliance via internal alignment.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enhances decision-making, resilience, and opportunity capture.
- Meets governance needs, builds stakeholder trust.
- Reduces losses, improves efficiency; voluntary but benchmarked by regulators.
- Competitive edge in strategy, operations, M&A.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: leadership buy-in, gap analysis, pilot, scale, monitor.
- Involves policy, training, tools (e.g., registers, dashboards).
- Universal applicability; no certification, focuses on integration.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 27032 | ISO 31000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Internet security and cyberspace collaboration | General enterprise risk management principles |
| Industry | Organizations with online presence, critical infrastructure | All industries, any organization size globally |
| Nature | Non-certifiable cybersecurity guidelines | Non-certifiable risk management guidelines |
| Testing | Gap analysis, tabletop exercises, audits | Internal audits, management reviews, monitoring |
| Penalties | No direct penalties, increased breach risks | No direct penalties, poor decision-making risks |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 27032 and ISO 31000
ISO 27032 FAQ
ISO 31000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity
Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier
CMMC Cost Calculator: Realistic Budgets for Levels 1-3, C3PAO Fees, and ROI for Small DIB Suppliers
Calculate realistic CMMC costs for Levels 1-3: self-assessments, C3PAO fees, tooling, remediation & ROI. Interactive tool for small DIB suppliers. Get benchmark
SOC 2 for Fintech Startups: First 5 Steps to Compliance with Confidentiality Criterion Infographic
First 5 steps to SOC 2 compliance with Confidentiality for fintech SaaS. Infographic maps controls to risks like encryption & TPRM. Integrates GLBA/PCI DSS over
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs CIS Controls
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs CIS Controls: Compare AI governance framework with cybersecurity hygiene. Uncover synergies, gaps, and strategies for secure, compliant AI systems now.
WEEE vs ISO 19600
Discover WEEE vs ISO 19600: EU's binding e-waste directive meets compliance guidelines. Unlock key differences, risks, strategies & integration for regulatory mastery now.
TISAX vs ISO 22301
Discover TISAX vs ISO 22301: Automotive infosec vs business continuity. Key differences, overlaps & strategies for supply chain resilience. Secure compliance now!