ISO 27032
Guidelines for Internet cybersecurity and stakeholder collaboration
TOGAF
Vendor-neutral framework for enterprise architecture governance
Quick Verdict
ISO 27032 provides cybersecurity guidelines for Internet security and multi-stakeholder collaboration, while TOGAF offers an enterprise architecture framework for aligning business strategy with IT. Organizations adopt ISO 27032 for cyber resilience and TOGAF for transformation governance.
ISO 27032
ISO/IEC 27032:2023 Guidelines for Internet Security
Key Features
- Multi-stakeholder collaboration for cyberspace security
- Guidelines bridging information, network, Internet security
- Risk assessment tailored to Internet threats
- Annex A mapping to ISO 27002 controls
- Emphasis on detection, response, information sharing
TOGAF
TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition
Key Features
- Iterative Architecture Development Method (ADM)
- Content Framework with metamodel and artifacts
- Enterprise Continuum for asset reuse
- Reference models like TRM and III-RM
- Architecture Capability Framework and governance
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 27032 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27032:2023, titled Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security, is an international guidance standard (informative, non-certifiable) focused on enhancing Internet security within the broader cyberspace ecosystem. It connects siloed domains like information security, network security, and critical infrastructure protection (CIIP), using a risk-based, collaborative approach to manage threats, vulnerabilities, and incidents across stakeholders.
Key Components
- Thematic domains covering risk assessment, incident management, stakeholder roles, technical controls (e.g., secure coding, monitoring), awareness, and collaboration.
- Annex A maps Internet threats to ISO/IEC 27002 controls.
- Built on multi-stakeholder principles and PDCA cycle; no fixed control count, emphasizes integration.
- Non-certifiable; complements ISO 27001 ISMS via Statement of Applicability.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates legal/regulatory risks (e.g., NIS2, GDPR fines), reduces breach costs, enhances resilience.
- Builds stakeholder trust, enables market access, cuts insurance premiums.
- Provides competitive edge through efficient risk prioritization and incident response.
Implementation Overview
- Phased approach: scoping, gap analysis, controls deployment, monitoring.
- Targets all sizes with online presence; integrates with existing frameworks.
- No formal certification; uses audits, KPIs (MTTD/MTTR) for continuous improvement.
TOGAF Details
What It Is
The TOGAF® Standard (The Open Group Architecture Framework) is a vendor-neutral enterprise architecture framework for designing, planning, implementing, and governing enterprise-wide change. Its scope spans business, data, applications, and technology domains. The primary methodology is the iterative Architecture Development Method (ADM), enabling tailored, repeatable architecture lifecycles.
Key Components
- **ADM10 phases (Preliminary to Change Management) with continuous Requirements Management.
- **Content FrameworkDeliverables, artifacts (catalogs, matrices, diagrams), building blocks, and metamodel for core entities like actors and services.
- **Enterprise ContinuumClassifies reusable assets from generic foundations to organization-specific.
- **Reference ModelsTRM, SIB, III-RM for standards and interoperability.
- **Capability FrameworkGovernance (Architecture Board), skills, maturity models. Practitioner certification available.
Why Organizations Use It
- Aligns strategy with IT for efficiency, ROI, and risk reduction.
- Avoids vendor lock-in, promotes reuse and standards.
- Enhances governance, compliance, and transformation agility.
- Builds stakeholder trust via traceability and communication.
Implementation Overview
- Phased, iterative ADM with tailoring and pilots.
- Involves maturity assessment, repository setup, training.
- Suited for large enterprises across industries; voluntary certification.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 27032 | TOGAF |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Internet security, cyberspace risks, stakeholder collaboration | Enterprise architecture design, business-IT alignment, ADM lifecycle |
| Industry | All with online presence, critical infrastructure, global | Large enterprises, government, regulated sectors, global |
| Nature | Informative guidelines, non-certifiable, voluntary | Methodology framework, non-certifiable, voluntary |
| Testing | Gap analysis, risk assessments, internal audits | Maturity assessments, compliance reviews, architecture audits |
| Penalties | No direct penalties, increased breach risks | No penalties, potential transformation failures |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 27032 and TOGAF
ISO 27032 FAQ
TOGAF FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27001 Compliance
Discover top ISO 27001 compliance tools, their pros/cons, implementation steps, costs, and benefits. Streamline your path to certification and ongoing complianc
The Panoramic View: How Integrated Compliance Monitoring Creates Unprecedented Organizational Visibility and Adaptability
Gain unprecedented organizational visibility with integrated compliance monitoring. Automate real-time alerts, ensure GDPR & SOC 2 adherence, reduce risks, and
The Regulatory Radar: How Data-Driven Compliance Tools Provide Strategic Foresight
Unlock strategic foresight with data-driven compliance tools. Act as your regulatory radar: real-time monitoring, automated insights, and 3x cost cuts. Anticipa
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 9001 vs ISO 41001
ISO 9001 vs ISO 41001: Compare QMS excellence with FM systems. Uncover differences, benefits & ideal use cases for compliance, efficiency & sustainability. Choose smarter now!
ISO 37001 vs ISO 20000
Discover ISO 37001 vs ISO 20000: Anti-bribery governance & risk mitigation vs IT service lifecycle excellence. Compare certification, PDCA benefits, implementation—boost compliance now!
GDPR vs CSA
Explore GDPR vs CSA: EU's gold-standard privacy law meets Canada's HES safety standards. Uncover key differences in scope, enforcement & compliance for global ops. Master both!