ISO 30301
International standard for management systems for records
23 NYCRR 500
NY regulation for financial services cybersecurity compliance
Quick Verdict
ISO 30301 provides voluntary records governance for all organizations globally, while 23 NYCRR 500 mandates cybersecurity controls for NY financial firms with strict enforcement. Companies adopt ISO for certification and best practices; NYCRR for regulatory compliance.
ISO 30301
ISO 30301:2019 Management systems for records — Requirements
Key Features
- Certifiable management system for records (MSR) using HLS
- Explicit records requirements identification (Clause 4.1.2)
- Flexible conformity pathways: self-declaration to certification
- Risk-based planning for records risks (Clause 6)
- Normative Annex A operational controls for records lifecycle
23 NYCRR 500
23 NYCRR Part 500 Cybersecurity Regulation
Key Features
- Annual CISO/CEO dual compliance certification
- 72-hour cybersecurity incident notification requirement
- Phishing-resistant MFA for privileged/remote access
- Risk-based third-party service provider oversight
- Annual penetration testing and vulnerability management
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 30301 Details
What It Is
ISO 30301:2019 is an international certification standard specifying requirements for a Management System for Records (MSR). It ensures organizations create, control, and preserve authoritative records as evidence of business activities. The risk-based, PDCA approach uses High-Level Structure (HLS) clauses 4–10 plus normative Annex A for operational controls.
Key Components
- **Clauses 4–10Context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
- **Clause 8 + Annex ARecords lifecycle controls (creation, capture, access, retention, disposition).
- Built on ISO 15489 principles: authenticity, reliability, integrity, usability.
- Conformity via self-declaration, external confirmation, or third-party certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives governance accountability, compliance (legal/regulatory), risk mitigation (evidence loss), and efficiency (retrieval/disposition). Enhances stakeholder trust, auditability, and integration with other MSS like ISO 9001/27001.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: gap analysis, policy design, operational controls, audits. Scalable for any organization/size/sector; 12–18 months typical with cross-functional resources.
23 NYCRR 500 Details
What It Is
23 NYCRR Part 500 is the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) Cybersecurity Regulation, a mandatory state regulation for financial services entities in New York. It establishes minimum risk-based cybersecurity requirements to protect nonpublic information (NPI) and ensure information system integrity, confidentiality, and availability.
Key Components
- **14 core requirementsCybersecurity program, policy, CISO governance, access privileges, MFA, encryption, risk assessments, TPSP oversight, penetration testing, incident response, training, asset management, audit trails, notifications.
- Risk-assessment centric; annual CISO/CEO dual certification with 5-year evidence retention.
- No third-party certification; NYDFS examinations enforce compliance.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for Covered Entities (banks, insurers, licensees); avoids multimillion-dollar fines (e.g., Robinhood $30M).
- Enhances resilience, reduces incident risk, strengthens vendor management.
- Builds stakeholder trust, lowers insurance premiums, differentiates competitively.
Implementation Overview
- Phased roadmap: Gap analysis, asset inventory, MFA rollout, TPSP contracts, IR testing.
- Applies to NY-licensed financial entities; Class A (>$20M NY revenue, >2000 employees) face enhanced controls.
- Self-attestation annually by April 15; evidence-based for audits. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 30301 | 23 NYCRR 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Records management systems lifecycle | Financial cybersecurity program controls |
| Industry | All organizations worldwide | NY financial services entities |
| Nature | Voluntary certifiable standard | Mandatory state regulation |
| Testing | Internal audits, management reviews | Annual pen tests, vulnerability scans |
| Penalties | Loss of certification | Fines, consent orders, enforcement |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 30301 and 23 NYCRR 500
ISO 30301 FAQ
23 NYCRR 500 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2
Use CIS Controls v8.1 as your compliance on-ramp. Map one security program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2 without duplicating work via practical mapp

Practical Implementation Blueprint for Regulation S-K Item 106: Cybersecurity Governance and Risk Management Disclosures in 10-Ks
Step-by-step guide for Item 106 cybersecurity disclosures in 10-Ks: risk management, board oversight, Inline XBRL templates (Dec 2024 compliance). Templates for

NIST CSF 2.0: Key Enhancements and How They Address Evolving Cyber Threats
Explore NIST CSF 2.0 updates: Govern function, supply chain security, SME playbooks for ransomware & AI threats. Boost your cyber defenses now!
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
J-SOX vs EU AI Act
Explore J-SOX vs EU AI Act: Japan's flexible ICFR regime meets Europe's strict AI rules. Uncover key differences, compliance strategies & global governance tips. Master it now!
ISO 9001 vs NIST 800-53
ISO 9001 vs NIST 800-53: Compare QMS excellence with cybersecurity controls. Uncover key differences, benefits, implementation tips for compliance & risk management success. (152 characters)
GMP vs CAA
Discover GMP vs CAA: Pharma quality standards vs Clean Air Act emissions rules. Unlock key differences, compliance strategies & risk mitigation for seamless operations. Dive in!