Standards Comparison

    ISO 30301

    Voluntary
    2019

    International standard for records management systems

    VS

    ISO 27018

    Voluntary
    2019

    International code for PII protection in public cloud processors.

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 30301 establishes governance for records management systems across organizations, while ISO 27018 provides cloud-specific PII protection controls for processors. Companies adopt ISO 30301 for evidence-based accountability and ISO 27018 for privacy assurance in public clouds.

    Records Management

    ISO 30301

    ISO 30301:2019 Management systems for records requirements

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Certifiable requirements for Management System for Records (MSR)
    • High-Level Structure (HLS) clauses 4-10 for governance integration
    • Normative Annex A records operational controls
    • Explicit records requirements identification (Clause 4.1.2)
    • Three conformity pathways: self-declaration, confirmation, certification
    Cloud Privacy

    ISO 27018

    ISO/IEC 27018:2025 PII protection in public clouds

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • PII protection for public cloud processors
    • Consent and purpose limitation enforcement
    • Sub-processor transparency and management
    • Secure PII deletion and return on termination
    • Breach notification and auditability requirements

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 30301 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 30301:2019 is the international certifiable standard specifying requirements for a Management System for Records (MSR). It provides a structured framework to establish, implement, maintain, and improve records processes ensuring authoritative evidence of business activities. Applicable to any organization, it uses a risk-based, PDCA management system approach aligned with the High-Level Structure (HLS).

    Key Components

    • **Clauses 4-10Context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
    • **Clause 8 and Annex A (normative)Records lifecycle controls (creation, capture, access, retention, disposition).
    • Core principles: authenticity, reliability, integrity, usability.
    • Flexible conformity: self-declaration, external confirmation, or third-party certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Organizations adopt ISO 30301 for compliance assurance, risk mitigation (e.g., evidence loss, regulatory fines), operational efficiency, and stakeholder trust. It supports auditability, transparency, and integration with other MSS, enhancing governance and decision traceability.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: gap analysis, policy development, operational controls design, training, internal audits. Scalable for any size/sector; certification optional via accredited bodies.

    ISO 27018 Details

    What It Is

    ISO/IEC 27018:2025 is a code of practice extending ISO/IEC 27002 for protecting personally identifiable information (PII) in public cloud environments where providers act as PII processors. Its primary scope targets cloud service providers handling customer PII, using a risk-based, control-overlay approach on an ISO 27001 ISMS.

    Key Components

    • Core themes: consent/purpose limitation, transparency, data minimization, subcontractor management, logging/auditability, breach notification, secure deletion.
    • Builds on ISO/IEC 27002:2022's 93 controls with ~25-30 privacy-specific additions and Annex B guidance.
    • Assessed via ISO 27001 audits; no standalone certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Meets processor obligations under GDPR-like laws; enhances due diligence.
    • Builds trust with customers via transparency and audit evidence.
    • Reduces procurement friction; supports multi-framework compliance (e.g., SOC 2).
    • Mitigates cloud PII risks like multi-tenancy, cross-border transfers.

    Implementation Overview

    • Layer onto existing ISO 27001 ISMS via gap analysis, control mapping.
    • Key activities: policy updates, cloud monitoring setup, vendor management.
    • Suits cloud/SaaS providers globally; uses GRC tools for automation.
    • Requires annual surveillance audits within ISO 27001 cycle.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    ISO 30301
    Records management systems governance
    ISO 27018
    PII protection in public cloud processors

    Industry

    ISO 30301
    All organizations worldwide
    ISO 27018
    Cloud service providers globally

    Nature

    ISO 30301
    Certifiable management system standard
    ISO 27018
    Code of practice extending ISO 27001

    Testing

    ISO 30301
    Self-declaration or third-party certification
    ISO 27018
    Integrated ISO 27001 audits and surveillance

    Penalties

    ISO 30301
    Loss of certification, no legal fines
    ISO 27018
    No direct penalties, certification withdrawal

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 30301 and ISO 27018

    ISO 30301 FAQ

    ISO 27018 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages