ISO 30301
International standard for records management systems
MAS TRM
Singapore guidelines for financial technology risk management
Quick Verdict
ISO 30301 provides certifiable records governance for all organizations globally, while MAS TRM enforces technology risk controls for Singapore FIs. Companies adopt ISO 30301 for compliance assurance; MAS TRM to avoid fines and ensure cyber resilience.
ISO 30301
ISO 30301:2019 Management systems for records — Requirements
Key Features
- Certifiable requirements for Management System for Records (MSR)
- High-Level Structure (HLS) clauses 4-10 for governance integration
- Normative Annex A operational controls for records lifecycle
- Explicit records requirements identification (Clause 4.1.2)
- Flexible conformity pathways: self-declaration to third-party certification
MAS TRM
MAS Technology Risk Management Guidelines (2021)
Key Features
- Board and senior management accountability
- Proportional implementation by risk profile
- Third-party risk management integration
- Layered cyber defence and resilience
- Annual penetration testing for internet systems
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 30301 Details
What It Is
ISO 30301:2019 (Information and documentation — Management systems for records — Requirements) is an international certifiable standard specifying requirements for a Management System for Records (MSR). It applies to any organization to ensure reliable evidence of business activities supports mandate, strategy, and goals. Adopts High-Level Structure (HLS) with risk-based PDCA approach via Clauses 4–10, plus records-specific operations in Clause 8 and Annex A (normative).
Key Components
- Governance pillars: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement (Clauses 4–10).
- Operational controls: records creation, processes, systems (Clause 8, Annex A).
- Core principles: authenticity, reliability, integrity, usability.
- Conformity models: self-declaration, external confirmation, third-party certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Enhances compliance, auditability, risk mitigation (loss, alteration), efficiency in retrieval/disposition. Builds stakeholder trust, integrates with ISO 9001/27001. Strategic for regulated sectors (finance, healthcare, public).
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, policy/roles design, operational controls, training, audits. Scalable for any size/industry; 9–18 months typical. Certification optional via accredited bodies.
MAS TRM Details
What It Is
MAS Technology Risk Management (TRM) Guidelines (revised January 2021) are supervisory guidelines issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) for financial institutions. They provide a principles-based framework for managing technology and cyber risks, emphasizing governance, resilience, and proportional implementation based on risk profile and complexity to protect confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA).
Key Components
- 15 main sections covering governance, risk frameworks, secure development, IT operations, resilience, access controls, cryptography, cyber defense, testing, and audit.
- Synthesised into 12 core principles like board accountability, asset management, third-party oversight.
- No fixed control count; focuses on outcomes with continuous improvement.
- Compliance via supervisory review, no formal certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets MAS supervisory expectations for licensed FIs, avoiding enforcement.
- Enhances cyber resilience, operational stability, and customer trust.
- Supports digital transformation with secure-by-design practices.
- Builds competitive edge through robust risk metrics and assurance.
Implementation Overview
- Risk-based rollout: asset inventory, governance setup, control mapping, testing.
- Applies to all MAS-supervised FIs; scalable by size/complexity.
- Involves board approval, training, audits; 12-24 months typical.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 30301 | MAS TRM |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Records management systems governance and lifecycle controls | Technology and cyber risk across financial IT operations |
| Industry | All organizations worldwide, any sector | Singapore financial institutions only |
| Nature | Voluntary certifiable management system standard | Supervisory guidelines with enforcement consideration |
| Testing | Internal audits, management reviews, self-declaration options | Annual pen tests for internet systems, DR tests, red teaming |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties | Fines, license revocation, executive prohibitions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 30301 and MAS TRM
ISO 30301 FAQ
MAS TRM FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)
Translate CIS Controls v8.1 to cloud-native: Kubernetes patterns for IAM, logging, vuln mgmt, hardening on AWS, Azure, GCP + IaC. Practical playbook for teams.

Why the SEC Stepped In: The Investor-Driven Push for Cybersecurity Transparency
Discover why the SEC's 2023 cybersecurity rules treat cyber risks as material financial threats. Explore the 'stick and carrot' approach for standardized disclo

SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder for Security, Availability, and Beyond
Decode AICPA Trust Services Criteria from auditor jargon to plain English with side-by-side tables, analogies & TL;DRs. CISOs & founders: implement SOC 2 contro
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
REACH vs CMMI
REACH vs CMMI: Compare EU chemical regulation (registration, evaluation, authorisation, restrictions) with process maturity framework. Boost compliance & performance—essential guide!
FSSC 22000 vs SAMA CSF
Discover FSSC 22000 vs SAMA CSF: Food safety powerhouse meets Saudi cyber framework. Compare scopes, maturity models & compliance for industry success. Dive in now!
IEC 62443 vs GDPR UK
Discover IEC 62443 vs UK GDPR: Compare OT cybersecurity standards with data protection laws. Align zones, SLs & principles for industrial compliance. Expert guide!