ISO 30301
International standard for records management systems
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
U.S. SEC regulation for cybersecurity incident and risk disclosures
Quick Verdict
ISO 30301 provides voluntary MSR certification for reliable records governance worldwide, while U.S. SEC rules mandate rapid incident disclosures and risk oversight for public firms to protect investors.
ISO 30301
ISO 30301:2019 Management systems for records Requirements
Key Features
- Certifiable requirements for Management System for Records (MSR)
- High-Level Structure governance with Clauses 4-10
- Normative Annex A operational controls for records lifecycle
- Explicit records requirements analysis (Clause 4.1.2)
- Flexible conformity pathways including third-party certification
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, and Incident Disclosure
Key Features
- Four-business-day disclosure of material cybersecurity incidents
- Annual risk management, strategy, and governance disclosures
- Inline XBRL tagging for machine-readable data
- Board oversight and management role requirements
- Inclusion of third-party incidents in scope
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 30301 Details
What It Is
ISO 30301:2019 is an international certification standard specifying requirements for a Management System for Records (MSR). It applies to any organization to establish, implement, maintain, and improve records processes ensuring authoritative evidence of business activities. The standard uses a risk-based, PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) methodology aligned with the High-Level Structure (HLS) for management systems.
Key Components
- **Clauses 4-10Context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- **Clause 8 and Annex A (normative)Records lifecycle controls (creation, capture, access, retention, disposition).
- Core principles: Authenticity, reliability, integrity, usability.
- Conformity via self-declaration, external confirmation, or third-party certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives compliance with legal/regulatory obligations, mitigates records risks (loss, alteration), enhances efficiency, and supports auditability. Builds stakeholder trust, enables integration with other MSS, and provides competitive advantages in regulated sectors like finance and public administration.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: Gap analysis, policy development, operational controls, training, audits. Scalable for any size/industry; certification optional via accredited bodies.
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules Details
What It Is
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules (Release No. 33-11216), officially "Cybersecurity Risk Management, Strategy, Governance, and Incident Disclosure," is a mandatory U.S. regulation for public companies. It standardizes disclosures on material cybersecurity incidents and ongoing risk management, strategy, and governance. The approach is materiality-based, aligning with securities law principles without bright-line thresholds.
Key Components
- **Incident disclosureForm 8-K Item 1.05 requires reporting material incidents within four business days of materiality determination.
- **Annual disclosuresRegulation S-K Item 106 mandates descriptions of risk processes, board oversight, and management roles in Forms 10-K/20-F.
- Inline XBRL tagging for structured data comparability.
- Built on existing securities principles; no fixed controls, focuses on processes.
Why Organizations Use It
Enhances investor protection via timely, uniform information; reduces information asymmetry; integrates cyber risk into disclosure controls. Mitigates enforcement risks (e.g., fines, penalties as in Yahoo, Ashford cases); builds stakeholder trust; supports capital efficiency.
Implementation Overview
Phased compliance: incident reporting from Dec 2023 (SRCs June 2024); annual from FYE Dec 2023. Involves cross-functional playbooks, materiality frameworks, governance updates, third-party oversight. Applies to all Exchange Act registrants; no certification but SEC enforcement applies.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 30301 | U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Records management systems governance and lifecycle controls | Public company cybersecurity incident and governance disclosures |
| Industry | Any organization worldwide, scalable | U.S. public companies and FPIs only |
| Nature | Voluntary certifiable management system standard | Mandatory SEC reporting regulation |
| Testing | Internal audits, management review, certification audits | SEC enforcement, no formal certification |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal fines | SEC fines, enforcement actions, litigation |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 30301 and U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
ISO 30301 FAQ
U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Top 5 Reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Overlays Unlock AI Risk Management for Private Sector Enterprises in 2025
Top 5 reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 AI overlays unlock risk management for private enterprises. Tailorable controls combat model poisoning & data leakage. CISO i

Beyond the Boardroom: 5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Elevates Every Department
Discover 5 ways modern compliance software boosts HR, IT, finance & more: automate risks, enhance efficiency, ensure data integrity, stay audit-ready. Elevate y

Beyond the Burden: How Intuitive Compliance Software Transforms Daily Workflows
Explore intuitive compliance software that automates workflows, simplifies onboarding, and reduces stress. Cut non-compliance costs 3x and boost efficiency for
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
Six Sigma vs CSA
Compare Six Sigma vs CSA: DMAIC drives defect reduction & efficiency vs safety standards' risk controls. Optimize quality, compliance & ops. Discover key differences now!
NIST 800-171 vs ISO 19600
NIST 800-171 vs ISO 19600: Compare CUI cybersecurity (Rev 3 updates) with compliance systems. Key differences, scoping tips, and strategies for contractors—boost compliance now!
COBIT vs EU AI Act
Compare COBIT vs EU AI Act: Harness COBIT's tailored governance for AI risk mgmt, compliance & maturity under EU rules. Align IT strategy, boost resilience—discover now!