ISO 31000
International guidelines for enterprise risk management
AS9100
International standard for aerospace quality management systems.
Quick Verdict
ISO 31000 provides voluntary risk management guidelines for all organizations, while AS9100 is a certifiable quality standard for aerospace firms requiring rigorous product safety and supplier controls. Companies adopt ISO 31000 for better decisions; AS9100 for market access and compliance.
ISO 31000
ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines
Key Features
- Defines risk as effect of uncertainty on objectives
- Eight principles guiding integrated risk practices
- Framework embeds risk into governance and operations
- Iterative process for identification, treatment, monitoring
- Non-certifiable guidelines for any organization size
AS9100
AS9100D:2016 Quality Management Systems for Aerospace
Key Features
- Configuration management for product integrity
- Product safety processes across lifecycle
- Counterfeit parts prevention and detection
- Operational risk management controls
- Enhanced supplier performance monitoring
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 31000 Details
What It Is
ISO 31000:2018, Risk management — Guidelines is a non-certifiable international standard providing flexible guidance for systematic risk management. Its primary purpose is to help organizations of any size or sector manage uncertainty affecting objectives through a principles-based, iterative approach focused on creating and protecting value.
Key Components
- Three pillars: 8 principles (e.g., integrated, customized, dynamic), framework (leadership, integration, design, evaluation), and process (communication, assessment, treatment, monitoring, reporting).
- No fixed controls; emphasizes PDCA-like continual improvement.
- Guidelines only, no certification model.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enhances decision-making, resilience, and opportunity capture.
- Builds stakeholder trust via transparent governance.
- Aligns with regulations indirectly; drives strategic advantages like better resource allocation.
Implementation Overview
- Phased roadmap: leadership commitment, framework design, process piloting, integration, monitoring.
- Applicable universally; involves policy, training, tools like risk registers.
- No audits required, but internal assurance recommended. (178 words)
AS9100 Details
What It Is
AS9100D (2016) is the international quality management system (QMS) certification standard for aviation, space, and defense organizations. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with over 100 aerospace-specific requirements, using a process-based, risk-based thinking approach across 10 clauses.
Key Components
- Core pillars: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
- Aerospace additions: configuration management (8.1.2), product safety (8.1.3), counterfeit parts prevention (8.1.4), operational risks, human factors, supplier controls.
- Built on Annex SL structure; requires documented processes, KPIs, audits.
- Certification via accredited third-party audits (Stage 1/2, surveillance).
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for OEM supplier approval, market access via OASIS.
- Reduces defects, improves delivery, supply chain reliability.
- Mitigates safety risks, counterfeit threats; builds stakeholder trust.
- Drives cost savings, competitive edge in high-stakes industries.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, certification (6-18 months).
- Applies to manufacturers, designers, MROs globally; suits all sizes with scaled rigor.
- Involves cross-functional teams, digital tools for traceability.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 31000 | AS9100 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Enterprise risk management guidelines | Aerospace quality management system |
| Industry | All industries worldwide | Aviation, space, defense sectors |
| Nature | Non-certifiable guidelines | Certifiable quality standard |
| Testing | Internal audits and reviews | Accredited third-party audits |
| Penalties | No legal penalties | Loss of certification and contracts |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 31000 and AS9100
ISO 31000 FAQ
AS9100 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Top 5 Unseen Complexities Modern Compliance Software Effortlessly Manages
Uncover top 5 unseen complexities modern compliance software manages effortlessly—from sensitive data mapping to real-time regulatory shifts. Automate audits, i
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 Private Sector Tailoring Blueprint: First 5 Steps to Overlay-Driven Compliance with Infographic
Step-by-step blueprint for private sector NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 tailoring using overlays for AI & supply chain risks. Infographic + first 5 steps for ROI-drive
NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions
Unpack NIST CSF 2.0's enhanced Core Functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover. Get SME playbooks, governance shifts & strategies for cyber
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 45001 vs UL Certification
Compare ISO 45001 vs UL Certification: OH&S management system vs product safety marks. Uncover key differences, implementation strategies & ideal choice for compliance now.
ISO 27001 vs ISO 19600
ISO 27001 vs ISO 19600: Compare info security management (certifiable ISMS) with withdrawn compliance guidelines. Key diffs, benefits, implementation—boost resilience now!
ISO 27001 vs NIST 800-53
ISO 27001 vs NIST 800-53: Uncover key differences in controls, risk management, and compliance. Choose the best framework for resilient security—read now!