What is the primary objective of **ISO 31000**?

**ISO 31000’s primary objective is to provide principles, a framework, and process for managing risk to create and protect value.** It defines risk as the effect of uncertainty on objectives, enabling organizations to systematically identify, analyze, evaluate, treat, monitor, and report risks across any context (Clauses 4–6, ISO 31000:2018).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 31000**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 31000, as it provides voluntary guidelines applicable to any organization regardless of size, type, or sector.** Professionally, boards, executives, and risk officers in high-exposure sectors like finance, healthcare, and energy adopt it to enhance governance, decision-making, and resilience.

Does **ISO 31000** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, ISO 31000 does not require external audit or third-party certification, as it explicitly provides guidelines rather than auditable requirements.** ISO confirms it is “not intended for certification purposes”; alignment is demonstrated through internal governance, records, and performance evidence.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 31000** be performed?

**ISO 31000 assessments should be performed iteratively through continual monitoring and review, with periodic reassessments triggered by context changes, incidents, or management reviews.** The dynamic principle and Clause 6.5 mandate ongoing evaluation via KRIs, not fixed intervals like annual cycles.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 31000**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 31000 carries no direct legal penalties, as it is a non-mandatory guideline.** Indirect consequences include regulatory scrutiny in aligned regimes, operational losses from unmanaged risks, reputational damage, and heightened litigation exposure where courts reference it as due diligence best practice.

Can **ISO 31000** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 31000 can be mapped to other international frameworks as its principles, framework, and process provide a foundational architecture for risk management.** It aligns conceptually with standards like those for quality or information security by operationalizing risk assessment, treatment, and integration without prescriptive overlap.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 31000**?

**The first step to implement ISO 31000 is to secure leadership commitment, including top management issuing a risk management policy and integrating it into governance (Clause 5.1).** This establishes accountability, resources, and context before designing the framework or process.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 22000**?

**ISO 22000 enables organizations to provide safe products through a Food Safety Management System (FSMS) that prevents or reduces food safety hazards to acceptable levels.** It integrates **PRPs**, **hazard analysis**, **CCPs/OPRPs**, and **HACCP principles** with management system requirements across Clauses 4–10, ensuring compliance with statutory and customer requirements via effective communication and two nested **PDCA cycles** (organizational and operational).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 22000**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 22000, as it is a voluntary international standard.** It applies professionally to any entity in the food chain—**primary producers**, **feed producers**, **processors**, **packaging providers**, **logistics**, **retail**, and **services**—impacting food safety, regardless of size, to demonstrate FSMS effectiveness for certification, suppliers, or customers.

Does **ISO 22000** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 22000 does not require external audit or third-party certification, as it is voluntary.** Certification is achieved via accredited bodies through **Stage 1** (readiness review) and **Stage 2** (implementation audit), followed by annual surveillance and triennial recertification, confirming FSMS conformity to all clauses including **PRPs**, **hazard control plans**, and **management reviews**.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 22000** be performed?

**Internal audits for ISO 22000 must be conducted at planned intervals, with risk-based frequency targeting high-risk processes more often.** **Management reviews** occur at predetermined intervals (typically annually or semi-annually), incorporating performance data, audits, and changes; continual assessments via monitoring, verification, and corrective actions ensure ongoing FSMS effectiveness per Clauses 9 and 10.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 22000**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 22000 results in loss of certification, ineligibility for supplier qualification, and heightened business risks like recalls or brand damage.** It exposes organizations to statutory penalties under food laws (e.g., fines, shutdowns), customer rejection, litigation from hazards, and supply chain exclusion, without direct ISO penalties since certification is voluntary.

Can **ISO 22000** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 22000:2018 aligns with other frameworks via its High-Level Structure (HLS) in Clauses 4–10.** This enables integration with management systems sharing **Annex SL**, facilitating combined audits, shared processes for risk, leadership, and PDCA, while foundational for GFSI schemes like **FSSC 22000** that mandate all ISO 22000 requirements plus sector PRPs.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 22000**?

**The first step is determining organizational context, FSMS scope, and interested parties per Clause 4.** Conduct a **gap analysis** against Clauses 4–10, form a cross-functional food safety team, and define boundaries, internal/external issues, and risks to inform planning, PRPs, and hazard analysis.

ISO 31000 vs ISO 22000

Standards Comparison

ISO 31000

Voluntary

2018

International guidelines for enterprise risk management

ISO 22000

Voluntary

2018

International standard for food safety management systems

Quick Verdict

ISO 31000 provides universal risk management guidelines for all organizations, while ISO 22000 delivers certifiable food safety systems for food chain entities. Companies adopt ISO 31000 for enterprise resilience and ISO 22000 for compliance, market access, and hazard control.

Risk Management

ISO 31000

ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

1. Defines risk as effect of uncertainty on objectives
2. Outlines eight principles for integrated risk management
3. Emphasizes leadership commitment and governance integration
4. Provides iterative six-step risk management process
5. Non-certifiable guidelines for any organization

Food Safety

ISO 22000

ISO 22000:2018 Food safety management systems

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

High-Level Structure for integration with other ISO standards
Dual PDCA cycles for governance and operations
HACCP-based hazard analysis and control plans
Prerequisite programs with CCPs and OPRPs
Risk-based thinking and leadership accountability

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

ISO 31000 Details

What It Is

ISO 31000:2018, Risk management — Guidelines, is an international standard offering non-certifiable guidance for enterprise-wide risk management. It defines risk as the effect of uncertainty on objectives, providing a principles-based approach applicable to any organization to create and protect value through better decisions.

Key Components

**Eight principlesintegrated, structured/comprehensive, customized, inclusive, dynamic, best available information, human/cultural factors, continual improvement.
Framework (Clause 5): leadership/commitment, integration, design, implementation, evaluation, improvement—mirroring PDCA cycle.
Process (Clause 6): communication/consultation, scope/context/criteria, risk assessment (identify/analyze/evaluate), treatment, monitoring/review, recording/reporting. No certification; focuses on internal alignment and governance.

Why Organizations Use It

Drives strategic resilience, opportunity realization, resource optimization.
Enhances governance, stakeholder trust without certification costs.
Mitigates losses, supports regulatory compliance indirectly.
Builds competitive edge via risk-informed decisions.

Implementation Overview

Phased: secure leadership, gap analysis/design, pilot/deploy process, integrate/operationalize, monitor/improve. Universal applicability; internal audits/reviews recommended, no mandatory certification.

ISO 22000 Details

What It Is

ISO 22000:2018 is the international standard for Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS), a certifiable framework for organizations in the food chain to deliver safe products. It integrates HACCP principles with management system discipline using a risk-based approach and High-Level Structure (HLS) for alignment with other ISO standards.

Key Components

Clauses 4-10: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement
Core: PRPs, hazard analysis, CCPs/OPRPs, traceability, verification, withdrawal/recall
Built on dual PDCA cycles and Codex HACCP
Voluntary certification via accredited bodies

Why Organizations Use It

Ensures regulatory/customer compliance and hazard prevention
Reduces recalls, risks, litigation via robust controls
Boosts market access, GFSI recognition, supplier qualification
Builds trust, efficiency, resilience

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, PRPs/hazard plans, training, audits
Applies globally to all food chain entities/sizes
Certification: stage 1/2 audits, annual surveillance

Key Differences

Aspect	ISO 31000	ISO 22000
Scope	Enterprise-wide risk management guidelines	Food safety management system with HACCP
Industry	All industries, any organization worldwide	Food chain organizations globally
Nature	Non-certifiable guidelines, voluntary	Certifiable management system standard
Testing	Internal audits, management reviews	Internal audits, CCP/OPRP monitoring, certification audits
Penalties	No formal penalties, loss of alignment	Certification loss, regulatory food safety fines

Scope

ISO 31000

Enterprise-wide risk management guidelines

ISO 22000

Food safety management system with HACCP

Industry

ISO 31000

All industries, any organization worldwide

ISO 22000

Food chain organizations globally

Nature

ISO 31000

Non-certifiable guidelines, voluntary

ISO 22000

Certifiable management system standard

Testing

ISO 31000

Internal audits, management reviews

ISO 22000

Internal audits, CCP/OPRP monitoring, certification audits

Penalties

ISO 31000

No formal penalties, loss of alignment

ISO 22000

Certification loss, regulatory food safety fines

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ISO 31000 and ISO 22000

ISO 31000 FAQ

ISO 22000 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

DORA Third-Party Risk Management: A Consultant’s Guide to Mapping Critical ICT Service Providers in 2026

Navigate DORA's complex third-party risk pillar. Step-by-step consultant guide to identify critical ICT providers, remediate Article 30 contracts, and build the

ISO 27701 Standalone Certification in 2025: Debunking Myths and Navigating the New Reality

Debunk myths on ISO 27701 standalone certification post-2025. Clarify viability, accreditation bodies, ISO 27001 audit differences & procurement benefits. Guide

Top 5 Unseen Complexities Modern Compliance Software Effortlessly Manages

Uncover top 5 unseen complexities modern compliance software manages effortlessly—from sensitive data mapping to real-time regulatory shifts. Automate audits, i

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

GDPR vs GMP

GDPR vs GMP: EU data privacy gold standard meets pharma manufacturing rules. Uncover key differences, compliance tips, fines up to 4% turnover, and strategies for seamless operations. Dive in!

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs NERC CIP

Compare ISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs NERC CIP: AI governance meets grid cybersecurity. Discover gaps, synergies for energy compliance. Boost resilient AI strategy now.

AS9110C vs ISO 41001

Compare AS9110C vs ISO 41001: Aerospace QMS for MRO safety, traceability & risk vs FM system for facility efficiency & sustainability. Uncover key differences to choose wisely. Explore now!

ISO 31000

ISO 22000

Quick Verdict

ISO 31000

Key Features

ISO 22000

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

ISO 31000 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 22000 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

ISO 31000 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 31000?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 31000?

Does ISO 31000 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 31000 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 31000?

Can ISO 31000 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 31000?

ISO 22000 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 22000?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 22000?

Does ISO 22000 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 22000 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 22000?

Can ISO 22000 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 22000?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

DORA Third-Party Risk Management: A Consultant’s Guide to Mapping Critical ICT Service Providers in 2026

ISO 27701 Standalone Certification in 2025: Debunking Myths and Navigating the New Reality

Top 5 Unseen Complexities Modern Compliance Software Effortlessly Manages

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

GDPR vs GMP

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs NERC CIP

AS9110C vs ISO 41001