GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/ISO 31000 vs ISO 28000
    Standards Comparison

    ISO 31000 vs ISO 28000

    ISO 31000

    Voluntary
    2018

    International guidelines for enterprise risk management

    VS

    ISO 28000

    Voluntary
    2022

    International standard for supply chain security management systems.

    Quick Verdict

    ISO 31000 provides voluntary risk management guidelines for all organizations, while ISO 28000 is a certifiable standard for supply chain security. Companies adopt 31000 for enterprise resilience; 28000 for auditable logistics protection and compliance.

    Risk Management

    ISO 31000

    ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Non-certifiable guidelines for any organization
    • Eight principles emphasizing integration and leadership
    • Framework embedding risk into governance operations
    • Iterative six-step risk management process
    • Defines risk as uncertainty effect on objectives
    Supply Chain Security

    ISO 28000

    ISO 28000:2022 Security management systems Requirements

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Risk-based PDCA cycle for security management
    • Supply chain interdependencies and third-party controls
    • Top management leadership and policy commitment
    • Operational security plans and incident response
    • Performance evaluation via audits and reviews

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    ISO 31000 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 31000:2018, Risk management — Guidelines is an international standard providing non-certifiable guidance for systematic risk management. Its primary purpose is to help organizations manage uncertainty affecting objectives, applicable to any size, sector, or type. It uses a principles-based, iterative approach focused on creating and protecting value.

    Key Components

    • Three pillars: Eight principles (e.g., integrated, customized, dynamic), framework (leadership, integration, design, implementation, evaluation, improvement), and process (communication, scope/context/criteria, assessment, treatment, monitoring/review, recording/reporting).
    • No fixed controls; flexible, PDCA-aligned structure.
    • Non-certifiable; relies on internal governance and audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Enhances decision-making, resilience, and value creation; supports compliance in regulated sectors; builds stakeholder trust; reduces losses and captures opportunities without mandatory certification burdens.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased approach: leadership commitment, gap analysis, pilot process, integration, monitoring. Suited for all organizations; involves policy, training, tools like risk registers. No external certification required.

    ISO 28000 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 28000:2022 is an international standard specifying requirements for a security management system (SMS) focused on supply chain security. It provides a risk-based framework using the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle to manage security risks like theft, sabotage, and disruptions.

    Key Components

    • Clauses 4-10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, and improvement.
    • Emphasizes risk assessment aligned with ISO 31000, operational controls, and security plans.
    • Built on harmonized ISO structure for integration with standards like ISO 22301 and ISO 27001.
    • Optional third-party certification via ISO 28003 guidelines.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Reduces supply chain risks and ensures continuity.
    • Meets contractual, regulatory, and partner requirements.
    • Enhances resilience, insurance terms, and market access.
    • Builds stakeholder trust through auditable governance.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased approach: gap analysis, risk assessment, controls deployment, training, audits.
    • Applicable to all sizes/industries; scalable for logistics, manufacturing.
    • Involves internal audits, management reviews; certification via Stage 1/2 audits.

    Key Differences

    AspectISO 31000ISO 28000
    ScopeEnterprise-wide risk management guidelinesSupply chain security management system
    IndustryAll industries, any organization sizeLogistics, manufacturing, supply chain sectors
    NatureNon-certifiable guidelinesCertifiable management system standard
    TestingInternal reviews, no formal certificationInternal audits, external certification audits
    PenaltiesNo legal penaltiesLoss of certification, no legal penalties

    Scope

    ISO 31000
    Enterprise-wide risk management guidelines
    ISO 28000
    Supply chain security management system

    Industry

    ISO 31000
    All industries, any organization size
    ISO 28000
    Logistics, manufacturing, supply chain sectors

    Nature

    ISO 31000
    Non-certifiable guidelines
    ISO 28000
    Certifiable management system standard

    Testing

    ISO 31000
    Internal reviews, no formal certification
    ISO 28000
    Internal audits, external certification audits

    Penalties

    ISO 31000
    No legal penalties
    ISO 28000
    Loss of certification, no legal penalties

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about ISO 31000 and ISO 28000

    ISO 31000 FAQ

    ISO 28000 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365

    CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365

    Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence

    Beyond the Checkbox: Why Maturity Assessments are the Secret to Sustainable Compliance

    Beyond the Checkbox: Why Maturity Assessments are the Secret to Sustainable Compliance

    Discover why maturity assessments beat binary compliance checks by uncovering hidden gaps and enabling continuous improvement for sustainable success. Read now!

    NIST CSF 2.0 Govern Function Deep Dive: Building Executive Cybersecurity Governance from Scratch

    NIST CSF 2.0 Govern Function Deep Dive: Building Executive Cybersecurity Governance from Scratch

    Step-by-step blueprint for NIST CSF 2.0 Govern function: templates, RACI matrices, metrics to elevate cybersecurity governance to boardroom level. Reduce breach

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how ISO 31000 and ISO 28000 compare against other standards

    Other ISO 31000 Comparisons

    • ISA 95 vs ISO 31000
    • ISO 31000 vs J-SOX
    • ISO 31000 vs SOX
    • ISO 31000 vs IATF 16949
    • ISO 31000 vs C-TPAT

    Other ISO 28000 Comparisons

    • ISO 37301 vs ISO 28000
    • ISO 56002 vs ISO 28000
    • ISO 21001 vs ISO 28000
    • C-TPAT vs ISO 28000
    • GLBA vs ISO 28000
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved