ISO 31000
International guidelines for enterprise risk management
J-SOX
Japanese regulation for ICFR in listed companies.
Quick Verdict
ISO 31000 offers voluntary risk management guidelines for all organizations worldwide, enhancing decision-making. J-SOX mandates ICFR assessments for Japanese listed firms, ensuring financial reporting reliability via auditor review. Companies adopt ISO 31000 for resilience; J-SOX for regulatory compliance.
ISO 31000
ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines
Key Features
- Defines risk as effect of uncertainty on objectives
- Establishes eight core principles for risk management
- Framework integrates risk into governance and leadership
- Iterative process covers assessment, treatment, monitoring
- Non-certifiable guidelines for any organization or sector
J-SOX
Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA)
Key Features
- Management-led ICFR assessment with auditor attestation
- Explicit IT controls and Response to IT component
- Principles-based risk scoping for listed companies
- COSO framework plus asset preservation objective
- Applies to foreign subsidiaries and equity affiliates
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 31000 Details
What It Is
ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines is an international standard offering non-certifiable guidance for systematic risk management. It defines risk as the effect of uncertainty on objectives, aiming to create and protect value across any organization. The principles-based approach includes a framework and iterative process for integration into governance and operations.
Key Components
- **Three pillarsEight principles (integrated, structured, customized, inclusive, dynamic, best information, human/cultural factors, continual improvement); framework (leadership commitment, integration, design, implementation, evaluation, improvement); process (communication/consultation, scope/context/criteria, risk assessment, treatment, monitoring/review, recording/reporting).
- Flexible, no fixed controls or certification model; aligns with PDCA cycle.
Why Organizations Use It
- Improves decision-making, resilience, and opportunity realization.
- Enhances governance, reduces losses, builds stakeholder trust.
- Voluntary best practice; strategic value in regulated sectors.
- Competitive edge via risk-informed strategy and efficiency.
Implementation Overview
- Phased roadmap: leadership alignment, gap analysis, pilot process, enterprise rollout, monitoring.
- Suited for all sizes, sectors, geographies; focuses on customization.
- No external certification; relies on internal audits and reviews. (178 words)
J-SOX Details
What It Is
J-SOX, or Japan's Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA) internal control provisions, is a regulation requiring management assessment of internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR). Enacted in 2006 and effective April 2008, it ensures reliable financial disclosures for listed companies using a principles-based, risk-based approach anchored in COSO framework.
Key Components
- Five COSO components plus Response to IT and asset preservation.
- Entity-level, process-level, and IT general controls (ITGCs).
- No fixed control count; focuses on key controls mitigating material misstatement risks.
- Management evaluation with external auditor attestation on report reliability.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for ~3,800 listed firms and subsidiaries to comply with FSA rules.
- Enhances financial reporting reliability, investor trust, and governance.
- Mitigates reputational/market risks; enables efficiency via automation.
Implementation Overview
- **Phasedgovernance, scoping, design, testing, reporting, monitoring.
- Targets listed companies in Japan; multinationals align with SOX.
- Requires documentation, ITGCs, testing; no separate certification but annual audit.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 31000 | J-SOX |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Enterprise-wide risk management guidelines | Internal controls over financial reporting |
| Industry | All industries, any organization globally | Listed companies in Japan and subsidiaries |
| Nature | Voluntary non-certifiable guidelines | Mandatory regulatory reporting under FIEA |
| Testing | Internal monitoring and continual review | Annual management assessment and auditor attestation |
| Penalties | No legal penalties | Fines, listing suspension, criminal liability |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 31000 and J-SOX
ISO 31000 FAQ
J-SOX FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Thailand PDPA Implementation Guide: Subordinate Regulations for 72-Hour Breach Reporting and Cross-Border Transfers (2022-2024 Rules)
Step-by-step Thailand PDPA guide: 72-hour breach notifications, cross-border transfers (2022-2024 rules). Risk checklists, GDPR templates avoid THB 5M fines. Mu

CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 Ransomware-Resilience Sprint: A 30-60-90 Day Action Plan (With Evidence Checklist)
Tactical CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 playbook for ransomware resilience. 30-60-90 day sprint with tool-agnostic tasks, ownership & evidence checklists to prove progre

Your Compliance Command Center: How Modern Tools Orchestrate Cross-Departmental Adherence
Unlock your compliance command center with modern tools for real-time monitoring, automation & integrations across IT, HR, Legal & Finance. Slash non-compliance
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
FedRAMP vs ISO 27018
Compare FedRAMP vs ISO 27018: US federal cloud authorization battles global PII privacy code. Uncover baselines, costs (150k-2M+), timelines (10-19mo), & pick the right compliance path now.
CSA vs ISO 30301
CSA vs ISO 30301: Compare OHS giants Z1000/Z1002 with records MSR. Uncover compliance diffs, PDCA alignment, risk controls & cert paths. Optimize governance—explore now!
CMMI vs EN 1090
CMMI vs EN 1090: Compare IT process maturity (CMMI) with EU steel/aluminium compliance (EN 1090). Boost efficiency, ensure CE marking—unlock expert insights now!