ISO 37001
International standard for anti-bribery management systems
APRA CPS 234
Australian prudential standard for information security resilience
Quick Verdict
ISO 37001 offers voluntary global anti-bribery certification for all sectors, mitigating legal risks through due diligence. APRA CPS 234 mandates information security for Australian financial firms, ensuring cyber resilience via strict testing and notifications.
ISO 37001
ISO 37001 Anti-Bribery Management Systems
Key Features
- Risk-based Anti-Bribery Management System framework
- Mandatory third-party due diligence and monitoring
- Leadership commitment and anti-bribery culture emphasis
- PDCA cycle for continual improvement
- Internationally certifiable standard with audits
APRA CPS 234
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security
Key Features
- Board ultimate responsibility for information security
- 72-hour APRA notification for material incidents
- Systematic independent testing of controls
- Third-party managed asset requirements
- Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 37001 Details
What It Is
ISO 37001:2025 Anti-Bribery Management Systems is a certifiable international standard providing requirements and guidance for establishing, implementing, and improving an Anti-Bribery Management System (ABMS). Its primary purpose is to help organizations prevent, detect, and respond to bribery risks proportionately, using a risk-based PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) approach across public, private, and not-for-profit sectors.
Key Components
- Clauses 4–10 covering context, leadership, planning, support, operations, evaluation, and improvement.
- Core controls: anti-bribery policy, risk assessments, third-party due diligence, financial/non-financial controls, training, reporting, and audits.
- Built on ISO Harmonized Structure for integration with standards like ISO 9001.
- Optional third-party certification with annual surveillance audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates legal risks (e.g., FCPA, UK Bribery Act) via evidentiary "reasonable steps".
- Enhances reputation, stakeholder trust, and ESG alignment.
- Delivers 15% compliance cost reductions and cultural shifts.
- Provides competitive edge in tenders and partnerships.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: gap analysis, risk assessment, control design, training, monitoring, certification. Applicable to all sizes/sectors; scalable and integrable.
APRA CPS 234 Details
What It Is
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding Australian regulation for APRA-regulated financial institutions. Effective from 1 July 2019, it requires maintaining an information security capability commensurate with threats and vulnerabilities to minimize impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of information assets, including those managed by third parties. It adopts a risk-based, assurance-driven approach emphasizing governance and resilience.
Key Components
- Board ultimate responsibility (para 13) and defined roles
- Asset classification by criticality and sensitivity (para 20)
- Commensurate lifecycle controls, systematic testing, internal audit (paras 21-34)
- Incident detection/response plans with annual testing (paras 23-26)
- APRA notifications: 72 hours for material incidents, 10 business days for weaknesses (paras 35-36) No fixed controls; ~24 core requirements.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for banks, insurers, super funds to avoid penalties, ensure operational resilience, manage third-party risks, and meet prudential obligations. Builds trust, reduces incident impacts, enhances competitiveness.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, policy framework, asset inventory/classification, controls/testing, monitoring. Applies Australia-wide to regulated entities of all sizes; requires independent assurance, no certification but APRA supervision. Typically 12-18 months.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 37001 | APRA CPS 234 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Anti-bribery management systems only | Information security and cyber resilience |
| Industry | All sectors worldwide | Australian financial services only |
| Nature | Voluntary certifiable standard | Mandatory prudential regulation |
| Testing | Internal audits, management reviews | Systematic independent control testing |
| Penalties | Certification loss, no legal penalties | Regulatory sanctions, fines, enforcement |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 37001 and APRA CPS 234
ISO 37001 FAQ
APRA CPS 234 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense
Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy

Thailand PDPA Enforcement Trends 2025: Analyzing 1,048 Complaints, Breach Volumes, and Hidden Lessons for Proactive Compliance
Decode PDPC Thailand's 1,048 complaints & 610 breaches. Uncover consent/security violations, project 2025 enforcement. Risk heatmap, self-assessment & playbook

SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder for Security, Availability, and Beyond
Decode AICPA Trust Services Criteria from auditor jargon to plain English with side-by-side tables, analogies & TL;DRs. CISOs & founders: implement SOC 2 contro
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
GDPR UK vs FedRAMP
Compare GDPR UK vs FedRAMP: UK data principles, ICO fines & DPIAs vs US NIST baselines & cloud auth. Master compliance differences now.
FERPA vs CMMI
FERPA vs CMMI: FERPA safeguards student privacy in education records; CMMI drives IT process maturity. Compare rules, exceptions & strategies for compliance mastery now!
WEEE vs J-SOX
Explore WEEE vs J-SOX: EU e-waste rules (Directive 2012/19/EU) vs Japan's ICFR controls. Key diffs, compliance strategies & risks for multinationals. Master global regs now!