ISO 37001
International standard for anti-bribery management systems
ISO 56002
International standard for innovation management systems guidance
Quick Verdict
ISO 37001 certifies anti-bribery systems to mitigate legal risks globally, while ISO 56002 guides innovation management for strategic value creation. Companies adopt 37001 for compliance defense, 56002 to systematize creativity and growth.
ISO 37001
ISO 37001:2025 Anti-Bribery Management Systems
Key Features
- Certifiable anti-bribery management system framework
- Risk-based bribery risk assessment and controls
- Mandatory third-party due diligence requirements
- Leadership commitment and compliance function
- PDCA cycle for continual improvement
ISO 56002
ISO 56002:2019 Innovation management system — Guidance
Key Features
- PDCA cycle and HLS structure for IMS
- Leadership commitment and policy requirements
- Portfolio management and uncertainty governance
- Non-prescriptive, adaptable guidance
- Integration with other ISO management systems
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 37001 Details
What It Is
ISO 37001:2025 is an international certifiable standard for Anti-Bribery Management Systems (ABMS). It provides requirements to prevent, detect, and respond to bribery risks across organizations. Scope covers direct/indirect bribery by personnel and associates. Employs a risk-based approach via PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) aligned with Harmonized Structure.
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
- Core controls: policy, risk assessment, due diligence, financial/non-financial controls, training, reporting.
- Built on ISO management system principles; third-party focus prominent.
- Optional certification with audits.
Why Organizations Use It
Mitigates legal risks (e.g., FCPA, UK Bribery Act); reduces liability via due diligence evidence. Builds trust, cuts compliance costs (up to 15%), enhances reputation. Drives efficiencies, cultural shift; demanded by stakeholders.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, risk assessment, controls, training, audits. Scalable for all sizes/sectors; 6-12 months typical. Certification via accredited bodies; ongoing surveillance required.
ISO 56002 Details
What It Is
ISO 56002:2019, Innovation management — Innovation management system — Guidance, is an international guidance standard from ISO/TC 279. It provides a generic framework for organizations to establish, implement, maintain, and continually improve an Innovation Management System (IMS). The primary purpose is to transform innovation into a managed, organization-wide capability for value realization, using a PDCA cycle and High-Level Structure (HLS) aligned with standards like ISO 9001.
Key Components
- Core clauses (4–10): context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement
- 8 principles: future-focused leadership, strategic direction, uncertainty management, continual learning
- Non-prescriptive; no fixed controls, adaptable to innovation types
- Conformity via internal audits or third-party assessments; not formally certifiable (ISO 56001 for requirements)
Why Organizations Use It
- Strategic alignment, better portfolio governance, reduced 'zombie projects'
- Risk/uncertainty management, enhanced competitiveness
- Stakeholder trust, integration with existing management systems
- Voluntary; driven by business growth, not legal mandates
Implementation Overview
- Phased roadmap: awareness, gap analysis, design, pilot, scale, sustain
- Key activities: policy development, training, KPI setup, audits
- Applicable to all sizes/sectors; emphasizes leadership commitment (179 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 37001 | ISO 56002 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Bribery prevention, detection, response via ABMS | Innovation management system for value creation |
| Industry | All sectors, high-risk like extractives, global | All sectors, established organizations, global |
| Nature | Certifiable requirements standard, voluntary | Guidance standard, non-certifiable directly |
| Testing | Third-party certification audits, annual surveillance | Internal audits, management reviews, no formal certification |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, certification loss, liability mitigation | No penalties, internal performance impacts only |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 37001 and ISO 56002
ISO 37001 FAQ
ISO 56002 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
The 'Black Box' Risk: Why Human-in-the-Loop is the Ultimate Fail-Safe for 2026 Security Operations
Uncover the black box AI risk in security ops. Learn why human-in-the-loop auditing is crucial for 2026. Upskill analysts to ensure data privacy and robust secu
HITRUST CSF MyCSF Platform Deep Dive: Automating Evidence Collection for Continuous R2 Renewal in Multi-Regulated Environments 2025
Unpack MyCSF's AI features for HITRUST CSF: automate evidence tagging, maturity scoring & monitoring for R2 renewals amid 2025 regs. CISOs in healthcare/fintech
PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates
Decode PDPA cross-border transfers for Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan. Statutory excerpts, approved mechanisms, SCC templates. Harmonize with GDPR, navigate exempt
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
UL Certification vs NERC CIP
Compare UL Certification vs NERC CIP: Decode safety marks (Listed/Recognized) & BES cybersecurity standards. Master compliance, gaps & strategies for grid reliability. Expert guide inside!
UL Certification vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023
UL Certification vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023: Safety marks & factory audits meet AI governance & PDCA. Compare risks, scopes, benefits for compliance edge. Discover now!
GDPR UK vs ISO 41001
Compare GDPR UK vs ISO 41001: Key differences in data protection vs facility management standards. Discover compliance overlaps, strategies & best practices for integrated systems. Optimize now!