What is the primary objective of **ISO 37301**?

**ISO 37301 specifies requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving an effective Compliance Management System (CMS).** Published on 13 April 2021, it replaces the guidance-only ISO 19600 by introducing certifiable 'shall' requirements using the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle and High-Level Structure (HLS). The standard enables organizations of all sizes and sectors to systematically identify compliance obligations, assess risks, embed controls, and drive continual improvement through leadership commitment and performance evaluation.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 37301**?

**ISO 37301 is voluntary and applicable to all organizations regardless of size, type, or sector, with no legal mandates.** It supports professional adoption for demonstrating CMS effectiveness to stakeholders like regulators, investors, and partners. Proportionality allows scaling to context; large enterprises like Kingspan have achieved multi-site certifications, while SMEs can implement lightweight registers focusing on material obligations.

Does **ISO 37301** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 37301 enables but does not require external audits or third-party certification.** Certification is available through accredited bodies like those under ANAB/ANSI, following a typical three-year cycle with initial assessment and surveillance audits. Organizations must conduct internal audits and management reviews; external certification provides verifiable evidence of conformity via documented performance and controls.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 37301** be performed?

**ISO 37301 requires continual performance evaluation through monitoring, measurement, internal audits at planned intervals, and management reviews.** Assessments are risk-based: high-risk areas audited more frequently. Certification involves surveillance audits typically annually within a three-year cycle. ISO 37302 provides guidance on maturity models and KPIs for ongoing effectiveness checks, updated for changes like the 2024 climate action amendment.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 37301**?

**Non-conformance with ISO 37301 leads to internal corrective actions, potential certification suspension, and heightened organizational risks like regulatory fines or reputational damage.** The standard mandates root-cause analysis, nonconformity control, and CMS improvements. Poor CMS performance exposes organizations to stakeholder distrust, litigation, and failure to mitigate compliance obligations, but lacks direct penalties as it is voluntary.

An **ISO 37301** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 37301 follows the High-Level Structure (HLS), enabling seamless mapping and integration with other ISO management system standards.** Its PDCA cycle and clauses (context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement) align for Integrated Management Systems (IMS), reducing duplication in audits and processes. Companion standards like ISO 37302 (effectiveness) and ISO 37303 (competence) extend its ecosystem.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 37301**?

**The first step is securing top management commitment and determining the organization's context per Clause 4.** This involves analyzing internal/external issues, identifying interested parties and their expectations, and scoping the CMS—including outsourced processes. Inventory compliance obligations to build a centralized register, prioritizing material risks for subsequent planning.

What is the primary objective of **CIS Controls**?

**The primary objective of CIS Controls is to provide a prioritized set of 18 cybersecurity best practices across 153 safeguards to reduce organizational attack surface and enhance cyber resilience against common threats.** CIS Controls v8.1, developed by the Center for Internet Security, targets real-world attack vectors like ransomware and credential theft through Implementation Groups (IG1–IG3), scaling from 56 essential IG1 safeguards for basic hygiene to full IG3 for advanced environments.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **CIS Controls**?

**No organization is universally legally required to comply with CIS Controls, as they represent voluntary, consensus-driven best practices applicable to all industries and sizes.** Professionally, CISOs, IT managers, compliance officers, and auditors in SMBs to enterprises adopt them for risk mitigation; U.S. states like Connecticut and Louisiana reference CIS for "reasonable security" safe harbor, while insurers, regulators, and partners expect them as evidence of hygiene.

Does **CIS Controls** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**CIS Controls does not require external audits or third-party certification, relying instead on self-assessment via tools like CIS Controls Navigator and CIS-CAT.** Organizations validate implementation through internal gap analysis, KPIs (e.g., asset inventory coverage), and optional penetration testing (Control 18), with CIS Benchmarks enabling automated configuration checks.

How often should an assessment for **CIS Controls** be performed?

**CIS Controls assessments should be performed continuously, with formal reviews at least annually or after significant changes.** IG-aligned self-assessments using CIS RAM or Navigator track safeguard effectiveness; continuous monitoring via Controls 7 (vulnerability management) and 8 (audit log management) ensures ongoing compliance, with quarterly KPI reviews (e.g., MTTR, patch SLAs) recommended.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **CIS Controls**?

**Non-compliance with CIS Controls exposes organizations to heightened breach risk, regulatory findings, and operational disruptions without direct legal penalties.** Lacking IG1 hygiene enables 85% of common attacks per CIS data, leading to fines under referenced regimes (e.g., GDPR €20M), litigation, insurance premium hikes, and contract losses; states citing CIS may deny safe harbor protections.

An **CIS Controls** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, CIS Controls v8.1 provides official mappings to over 25 frameworks via CIS Controls Navigator.** Safeguards align with NIST CSF 2.0 (e.g., Govern function), PCI DSS (e.g., vendor management), HIPAA, and GDPR, enabling single implementation for multi-regime compliance and reducing duplication.

What is the first step to begin implementing **CIS Controls**?

**The first step to implement CIS Controls is to secure executive sponsorship and conduct a baseline maturity assessment targeting IG1's 56 safeguards.** Define scope, inventory assets (Controls 1–2), and prioritize quick wins like MFA and vulnerability scanning using free tools like CIS Benchmarks and Navigator.

ISO 37301 vs CIS Controls

Standards Comparison

ISO 37301

Voluntary

2021

Certifiable international standard for compliance management systems

CIS Controls

Voluntary

2021

Prioritized cybersecurity framework for resilience

Quick Verdict

ISO 37301 provides certifiable compliance management systems for all organizations, emphasizing leadership, risk planning, and whistleblowing. CIS Controls offer prioritized cybersecurity safeguards for cyber hygiene. Companies adopt ISO 37301 for governance assurance, CIS for threat mitigation.

Compliance Management

ISO 37301

ISO 37301:2021 Compliance management systems – Requirements

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Certifiable requirements replacing guidance-only ISO 19600
High-Level Structure for IMS integration
Risk-based compliance obligations and planning
Leadership commitment and compliance culture emphasis
Confidential whistleblowing with anti-retaliation protections

Cybersecurity

CIS Controls

CIS Critical Security Controls v8.1

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

18 prioritized controls with 153 actionable safeguards
Implementation Groups IG1-IG3 for scalable adoption
Mappings to NIST, PCI DSS, HIPAA frameworks
Asset and software inventory automation emphasis
Free Benchmarks and Navigator tools provided

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

ISO 37301 Details

What It Is

ISO 37301:2021 is a certifiable international standard specifying requirements with guidance for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving Compliance Management Systems (CMS). It applies universally across organization sizes and sectors, using a risk-based, PDCA cycle approach aligned with ISO High-Level Structure (HLS).

Key Components

Core clauses: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
Emphasizes leadership commitment, risk assessment, whistleblowing protections, internal audits, and continual improvement.
Built on HLS for integration; supports companion standards like ISO 37302 (effectiveness) and ISO 37303 (competence).
Certification via accredited bodies (e.g., ANAB).

Why Organizations Use It

Drives risk reduction, regulatory compliance, stakeholder trust, and ESG alignment (e.g., 2024 climate amendment). Provides third-party validation, enhances reputation, and mitigates fines/reputational damage amid rising regulatory complexity.

Implementation Overview

Phased: initiate (gap analysis), design (registers/controls), implement (training), evaluate (audits), certify. Scalable for SMEs/enterprises; 3-year certification cycle with surveillance audits. Involves resources, culture change, and tools for obligations tracking.

CIS Controls Details

What It Is

CIS Critical Security Controls (CIS Controls) v8.1 is a community-driven, prescriptive cybersecurity framework of prioritized best practices to reduce attack surfaces and enhance resilience. It focuses on actionable safeguards across hybrid/cloud environments, using Implementation Groups (IG1–IG3) for risk-based scaling.

Key Components

18 Controls with 153 Safeguards, covering asset inventory, data protection, vulnerability management, incident response.
Built on real-world attack data; IG1 (56 safeguards) for essentials, IG2/IG3 for advanced.
No formal certification; self-assessed compliance via tools like CIS Navigator.

Why Organizations Use It

Mitigates 85% of common attacks; maps to NIST, PCI DSS, HIPAA.
Reduces breach risks, operational costs; builds insurer/regulator trust.
Enables compliance efficiency, competitive differentiation.

Implementation Overview

**Phased roadmapGovernance, gap analysis, IG1 execution (3–9 months), expansion.
Applies to all sizes/industries; automation-heavy for inventories, logging.
Metrics-driven; free Benchmarks, Navigator for audits. (178 words)

Key Differences

Aspect	ISO 37301	CIS Controls
Scope	Compliance obligations, risks, culture, whistleblowing	Cybersecurity assets, vulnerabilities, access, monitoring
Industry	All sectors, all sizes, global	All industries, all sizes, global
Nature	Certifiable management system standard, voluntary	Prioritized cybersecurity best practices, voluntary
Testing	Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits	Continuous vulnerability scans, penetration testing
Penalties	Loss of certification, no legal penalties	No penalties, increased cyber risk exposure

Scope

ISO 37301

Compliance obligations, risks, culture, whistleblowing

CIS Controls

Cybersecurity assets, vulnerabilities, access, monitoring

Industry

ISO 37301

All sectors, all sizes, global

CIS Controls

All industries, all sizes, global

Nature

ISO 37301

Certifiable management system standard, voluntary

CIS Controls

Prioritized cybersecurity best practices, voluntary

Testing

ISO 37301

Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits

CIS Controls

Continuous vulnerability scans, penetration testing

Penalties

ISO 37301

Loss of certification, no legal penalties

CIS Controls

No penalties, increased cyber risk exposure

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about ISO 37301 and CIS Controls

ISO 37301 FAQ

CIS Controls FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder for Security, Availability, and Beyond

Decode AICPA Trust Services Criteria from auditor jargon to plain English with side-by-side tables, analogies & TL;DRs. CISOs & founders: implement SOC 2 contro

Image this: What if GDPR would have NOT been implemented by the EU

What if the EU never implemented GDPR? Explore this hypothetical: consumer data protection in Dec 2025, key differences, pros/cons for users & companies. Read t

The Service-Oriented SOC: Leveraging Maturity Assessments to Guarantee SLOs and Operational Predictability

Transform your SOC into a service provider using maturity assessments to standardize workflows, guarantee SLOs, and ensure predictability amid turnover and risi

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

DORA vs Australian Privacy Act

Discover DORA vs Australian Privacy Act: EU financial resilience rules meet Australia's APPs & NDB scheme. Key diffs, compliance guide. Align your strategy now!

ISO 27032 vs POPIA

Compare ISO 27032 vs POPIA: Unpack global Internet cybersecurity guidelines against South Africa's data privacy law. Align for compliance, risk mitigation & resilience. Discover strategies now!

EPA vs AS9110C

Compare EPA vs AS9110C: Decode environmental regs (CAA, CWA, RCRA) against aerospace MRO quality standards for seamless compliance mastery. Expert insights await!

ISO 37301

CIS Controls

Quick Verdict

ISO 37301

Key Features

CIS Controls

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

ISO 37301 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

CIS Controls Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

ISO 37301 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 37301?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 37301?

Does ISO 37301 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 37301 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 37301?

An ISO 37301 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 37301?

CIS Controls FAQ

What is the primary objective of CIS Controls?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with CIS Controls?

Does CIS Controls require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for CIS Controls be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with CIS Controls?

An CIS Controls be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing CIS Controls?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder for Security, Availability, and Beyond

Image this: What if GDPR would have NOT been implemented by the EU

The Service-Oriented SOC: Leveraging Maturity Assessments to Guarantee SLOs and Operational Predictability

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

DORA vs Australian Privacy Act

ISO 27032 vs POPIA

EPA vs AS9110C