ISO 37301
International certifiable standard for compliance management systems
GRI
Global framework for sustainability impact reporting
Quick Verdict
ISO 37301 provides certifiable CMS requirements for compliance risk management across organizations, while GRI delivers modular sustainability reporting standards for impact disclosures. Companies adopt ISO 37301 for governance assurance and GRI for stakeholder transparency.
ISO 37301
ISO 37301:2021 Compliance management systems – Requirements
Key Features
- Certifiable requirements standard replacing guidance-only ISO 19600
- High-Level Structure enables integration with ISO 9001/14001/27001
- Risk-based planning identifies obligations, risks, and controls
- Mandates leadership commitment and compliance culture building
- Requires confidential whistleblowing channels and anti-retaliation protections
GRI
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards
Key Features
- Modular Universal, Sector, and Topic Standards
- Impact-based materiality assessment process
- Mandatory GRI Content Index for traceability
- Value chain impact disclosures required
- Transparent omission reasons allowed
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 37301 Details
What It Is
ISO 37301:2021 Compliance management systems – Requirements with guidance for use is a certifiable international standard for establishing, implementing, and improving Compliance Management Systems (CMS). It provides auditable requirements using a risk-based approach and Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle, applicable to all organization sizes and sectors, succeeding guidance-only ISO 19600.
Key Components
- Core pillars: context analysis, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- Emphasizes leadership commitment, risk assessment, whistleblowing protections, competence, and continual improvement.
- Built on ISO High-Level Structure (HLS) for integration.
- Certification via accredited bodies like ANAB, with 2024 climate action amendment.
Why Organizations Use It
- Demonstrates systematic compliance to stakeholders, reduces risks/fines.
- Enhances reputation, supports ESG/SDGs, meets investor demands.
- Provides third-party assurance, integrates with other ISO standards.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, obligation register, controls, training, audits.
- Scalable for SMEs/enterprises; 3-year certification cycle.
- Focuses on culture, resources; tools like platforms aid operationalization.
GRI Details
What It Is
Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Standards are the world's most used modular framework for sustainability reporting. They enable organizations to disclose significant impacts on economy, environment, and people using an impact-centric materiality approach, focusing on actual/potential effects rather than solely financial materiality.
Key Components
- Universal Standards (GRI 1: Foundation, GRI 2: General Disclosures, GRI 3: Material Topics): Baseline requirements, principles (accuracy, balance, verifiability), and materiality process.
- **Sector StandardsHigh-impact sector-specific topics (e.g., Oil & Gas, Mining).
- Topic Standards (e.g., GRI 403: Occupational Health & Safety): Specific disclosures/metrics. No formal certification; GRI Content Index ensures traceability.
Why Organizations Use It
- Regulatory alignment (e.g., EU CSRD interoperability).
- Risk management for HES/supply chains.
- Stakeholder trust, benchmarking, investor appeal.
- Strategic ESG integration, competitive advantage.
Implementation Overview
Phased: executive alignment, materiality assessment (GRI 3), data systems, reporting/index, assurance. Applies globally to all sizes/sectors; demands governance, cross-functional teams.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 37301 | GRI |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Compliance management systems (CMS) requirements | Sustainability impact reporting and disclosures |
| Industry | All sectors, sizes, global applicability | All sectors, sizes, global sustainability focus |
| Nature | Certifiable management system standard | Voluntary modular reporting framework |
| Testing | Third-party certification audits, 3-year cycle | Internal verification, external assurance optional |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal penalties | Reputational risk, no formal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 37301 and GRI
ISO 37301 FAQ
GRI FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Thailand PDPA Enforcement Trends 2025: Analyzing 1,048 Complaints, Breach Volumes, and Hidden Lessons for Proactive Compliance
Decode PDPC Thailand's 1,048 complaints & 610 breaches. Uncover consent/security violations, project 2025 enforcement. Risk heatmap, self-assessment & playbook

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365
Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence

NIST CSF 2.0 Govern Function Deep Dive: Building Executive Cybersecurity Governance from Scratch
Step-by-step blueprint for NIST CSF 2.0 Govern function: templates, RACI matrices, metrics to elevate cybersecurity governance to boardroom level. Reduce breach
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 27032 vs CSA
Explore ISO 27032 vs CSA: Cybersecurity guidelines meet OHS standards. Uncover differences, compliance strategies, risks & implementation for resilient ops. Dive in now!
PDPA vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
Compare PDPA (Singapore/Thailand privacy laws) vs MLPS 2.0 (China's cybersecurity scheme). Key differences, compliance strategies & insights for Asia-Pacific data protection.
DORA vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
Compare DORA vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules: EU finance resilience meets U.S. disclosure mandates. Unlock compliance strategies, risks & governance insights for global firms now.