ISO 37301 vs ISO 14064
ISO 37301
International certifiable standard for compliance management systems
ISO 14064
International standard for GHG quantification, reporting, and verification.
Quick Verdict
ISO 37301 establishes certifiable compliance management systems for regulatory risks across organizations, while ISO 14064 specifies GHG emissions quantification, reporting, and verification. Companies adopt them for credible governance, risk mitigation, stakeholder trust, and regulatory/market compliance.
ISO 37301
ISO 37301:2021 Compliance management systems — Requirements with guidance
Key Features
- First certifiable CMS standard replacing guidance-only ISO 19600
- High-Level Structure enables seamless integration with other ISO standards
- Risk-based approach identifies and manages compliance obligations
- Mandates top management commitment and compliance culture
- Requires confidential whistleblowing with anti-retaliation protections
ISO 14064
ISO 14064 Greenhouse gases specification series
Key Features
- Organizational GHG inventories (ISO 14064-1)
- Project emission reductions quantification (ISO 14064-2)
- Validation and verification processes (ISO 14064-3)
- Scopes 1-3 emissions classification and boundaries
- Five principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 37301 Details
What It Is
ISO 37301:2021, titled Compliance management systems — Requirements with guidance for use, is a certifiable international standard for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving effective Compliance Management Systems (CMS). Applicable to all organization sizes and sectors, it uses a risk-based PDCA cycle and High-Level Structure (HLS) for systematic identification of compliance obligations, risks, and opportunities.
Key Components
- Core clauses: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- Focus on compliance risk assessment, objectives, controls, whistleblowing, audits, and continual enhancement.
- Built on Annex SL HLS; integrates with ISO 9001, 14001, 27001; supported by companions like ISO 37302 (effectiveness), ISO 37303 (competence).
- Third-party certification via accredited bodies (e.g., ANAB).
Why Organizations Use It
- Reduces regulatory risks, fines, reputational damage; enhances investor confidence and ESG reporting.
- Builds integrity culture, stakeholder trust; provides certification evidence.
- Strategic drivers: regulatory complexity, supply chain demands; competitive edge in tenders.
Implementation Overview
- Phased approach: gap analysis, obligation register, training, internal audits, management reviews, certification.
- Scalable for SMEs to enterprises; global applicability.
- Typical timeline 12-18 months; requires resources, cultural change; ongoing surveillance audits.
ISO 14064 Details
What It Is
ISO 14064 is an international standard family (ISO 14064-1:2018, -2:2019, -3:2019) providing specifications with guidance for GHG emissions quantification, reporting, and verification. It establishes a modular framework for organizational inventories, project-level reductions, and independent assurance using principles of relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, and accuracy.
Key Components
- **Three partsPart 1 (organizational inventories), Part 2 (projects), Part 3 (validation/verification).
- Core principles mirror GHG Protocol.
- Covers Scopes 1-3, boundaries, baselines, monitoring.
- No fixed controls; principle-based with verification model under ISO 14065.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enables regulatory compliance (e.g., CSRD, SB-253), investor trust, carbon markets.
- Drives operational improvements, risk mitigation, competitive edge in green finance.
- Builds stakeholder credibility via assured, comparable GHG data.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: governance, boundary-setting, data systems, verification.
- Applies to all sizes/industries; mid-large firms via cross-functional teams.
- Third-party verification optional but key for credibility; 6-12 months typical.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 37301 | ISO 14064 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Compliance management systems (CMS) | GHG emissions quantification and verification |
| Industry | All sectors, all sizes globally | All sectors with GHG footprints globally |
| Nature | Certifiable management system standard | GHG accounting and reporting specifications |
| Testing | Certification audits, 3-year cycle | Independent validation/verification |
| Penalties | Loss of certification, no legal fines | No penalties, verification failure only |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 37301 and ISO 14064
ISO 37301 FAQ
ISO 14064 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Extending Your ISMS to PIMS in 12 Months or Less
Extend ISO 27001 ISMS to ISO 27701 PIMS in 12 months with our phased roadmap. Templates, checklists & infographics for RoPA, DSARs & audit-ready privacy complia
The NIS2 "FTE Trap": Why 5 Analysts for 24/7 Security is Actually 8 (and Why the Board Needs to Know)
Exposed: NIS2 FTE Trap math shows 5 analysts fail 24/7 coverage due to sickness, training, leave & 2026 churn. Line-by-line breakdown for compliance. Alert your
Top 10 Reasons CMMC Level 3 Certification Unlocks Competitive Edge for Primes Handling Critical DoD Programs
Discover top 10 reasons CMMC Level 3 certification unlocks competitive edge for DoD primes. Reduced APT risks, procurement prefs, NIST 800-172 compliance via v2
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Explore More Comparisons
See how ISO 37301 and ISO 14064 compare against other standards